Cargando…

Audit: Medical Seclusion Reviews at Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust

AIMS: Seclusion is a psychiatric treatment that is used as a “last resort” in light of deteriorating mental state. It involves the supervised confinement and isolation of a patient, away from other patients, in an area where the patient is not allowed to leave due to possible risk they pose to thems...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okoro, Esther, Adepoju, Jane, Ramji, Abbas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10345925/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.458
_version_ 1785073199898165248
author Okoro, Esther
Adepoju, Jane
Ramji, Abbas
author_facet Okoro, Esther
Adepoju, Jane
Ramji, Abbas
author_sort Okoro, Esther
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Seclusion is a psychiatric treatment that is used as a “last resort” in light of deteriorating mental state. It involves the supervised confinement and isolation of a patient, away from other patients, in an area where the patient is not allowed to leave due to possible risk they pose to themselves and others in order to manage severe agitation and chaotic behaviour. The Trust policy defines a procedure for seclusion which encourages decision making in line with the Mental Health Code of Practice 2015 (MHCoP 2015) and encourages the clinicians to adhere to the policy, making decisions and care which should be duly documented following an assessment of ongoing concern, mental state, assessment of physical health, medication review, risk assessment in a timely fashion as stipulated in the policy. METHODS: Timing of seclusion review: 1hour and 4hourly medical review. Independent Multidisciplinary Team meeting within 12hours on seclusion. Documentation of seclusion. Review of ongoing concerns. Mental state examination. Physical health review. Medication review. Risk assessment. Review of need for seclusion. Intervention. RESULTS: 107 incidences of seclusion that took place involving 61 patients were reviewed. 34% of patients were reviewed within the 1hour, 41% reviewed 4hourly and 47% had an internal MDT. 57% of medical reviews were documented with 50% clearly stating ongoing concerns, 47% carrying out a mental state examination and 42% had physical health reviews done. 44% had medication review done, 44% had risk assessment, 58% reviewed the need for seclusion and 52% had an intervention recorded. CONCLUSION: The audit showed poor adherence to the Trust guidelines both in terms of the frequency of the review and the vital aspects of the review as included in the seclusion review template. There seemed to be poor use of the seclusion template among medics, which is meant to serve as a prompt for the expected standards, hence more awareness is to be created. The areas of improvement also identified include the education and training of staff about the stipulation of the policy and clear documentation, with emphasis on the frequency as well as the quality of the reviews done.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10345925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103459252023-07-15 Audit: Medical Seclusion Reviews at Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust Okoro, Esther Adepoju, Jane Ramji, Abbas BJPsych Open Audit AIMS: Seclusion is a psychiatric treatment that is used as a “last resort” in light of deteriorating mental state. It involves the supervised confinement and isolation of a patient, away from other patients, in an area where the patient is not allowed to leave due to possible risk they pose to themselves and others in order to manage severe agitation and chaotic behaviour. The Trust policy defines a procedure for seclusion which encourages decision making in line with the Mental Health Code of Practice 2015 (MHCoP 2015) and encourages the clinicians to adhere to the policy, making decisions and care which should be duly documented following an assessment of ongoing concern, mental state, assessment of physical health, medication review, risk assessment in a timely fashion as stipulated in the policy. METHODS: Timing of seclusion review: 1hour and 4hourly medical review. Independent Multidisciplinary Team meeting within 12hours on seclusion. Documentation of seclusion. Review of ongoing concerns. Mental state examination. Physical health review. Medication review. Risk assessment. Review of need for seclusion. Intervention. RESULTS: 107 incidences of seclusion that took place involving 61 patients were reviewed. 34% of patients were reviewed within the 1hour, 41% reviewed 4hourly and 47% had an internal MDT. 57% of medical reviews were documented with 50% clearly stating ongoing concerns, 47% carrying out a mental state examination and 42% had physical health reviews done. 44% had medication review done, 44% had risk assessment, 58% reviewed the need for seclusion and 52% had an intervention recorded. CONCLUSION: The audit showed poor adherence to the Trust guidelines both in terms of the frequency of the review and the vital aspects of the review as included in the seclusion review template. There seemed to be poor use of the seclusion template among medics, which is meant to serve as a prompt for the expected standards, hence more awareness is to be created. The areas of improvement also identified include the education and training of staff about the stipulation of the policy and clear documentation, with emphasis on the frequency as well as the quality of the reviews done. Cambridge University Press 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10345925/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.458 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
spellingShingle Audit
Okoro, Esther
Adepoju, Jane
Ramji, Abbas
Audit: Medical Seclusion Reviews at Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
title Audit: Medical Seclusion Reviews at Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
title_full Audit: Medical Seclusion Reviews at Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
title_fullStr Audit: Medical Seclusion Reviews at Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
title_full_unstemmed Audit: Medical Seclusion Reviews at Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
title_short Audit: Medical Seclusion Reviews at Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
title_sort audit: medical seclusion reviews at derbyshire healthcare nhs foundation trust
topic Audit
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10345925/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.458
work_keys_str_mv AT okoroesther auditmedicalseclusionreviewsatderbyshirehealthcarenhsfoundationtrust
AT adepojujane auditmedicalseclusionreviewsatderbyshirehealthcarenhsfoundationtrust
AT ramjiabbas auditmedicalseclusionreviewsatderbyshirehealthcarenhsfoundationtrust