Documentation of Capacity Assessments for Psychiatric Inpatients

AIMS: How frequently and to what quality are mental capacity assessments being recorded on inpatient acute ward? Capacity is the ability to consent to a particular decision and is defined in law by the Mental Capacity Act (MCA). Capacity to make decisions is an area of particular importance in mental health care, as many mental illnesses can lead to people losing the capacity to make some decisions. Capacity assessment is a two-stage process. If a patient passes Stage 1, then they have capacity. If they fail Stage 1 then the assessment progresses to Stage 2. The person being assessed must then be competent at every step of Stage 2 to then be deemed to have capacity. Documentation of capacity assessments should demonstrate this two-stage assessment. METHODS: The sample included all people who were inpatients during the data collection window of 05 to 09 Sep 2022. For each person, their MHA status was recorded as this determined whether capacity to consent to admission was relevant. For each patient, their EPR was checked for any Mental Capacity Assessment proformas which were examined and recorded as being for admission, treatment, or something else. The cumulative case notes were then searched for any mention of ‘capacity’ and any additional capacity assessments were examined and added to the tool. All capacity assessments were reviewed against the defined standards. RESULTS: Sample and demographics - 22 male inpatients. 21 patients subject to the MHA and 1 was an informal patient. The CTT rule applied to 7 patients. Treatment - 17 of 22 had capacity assessment for treatment at admission. All of these were recorded using the proforma and all were in line with best practice guidance. 7 had the CTT rule applied to at the time of the audit. None of the records for these people included documentation of a repeated mental capacity assessment. Something Else - 9 capacity assessments recorded for ‘something else’. Five were recorded on proforma and in line with best practice guidance. 4 capacity assessments were as case notes and didn't meet best practice criteria. CONCLUSION: Capacity assessment for treatment is being conducted and recorded well at the time of admission, but not at the point that CTT rules apply from. Most capacity assessments were recorded on the EPR proforma and all of these met best practice guidance. 4 capacity assessments were recorded in case notes and none of these met best practice guidance.