Cargando…

A framework for assessing clinical trial site readiness

Clinical trial processes are unnecessarily inefficient and costly, slowing the translation of medical discoveries into treatments for people living with disease. To reduce redundancies and inefficiencies, a group of clinical trial experts developed a framework for clinical trial site readiness based...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buse, John B., Austin, Christopher P., Johnston, S. Claiborne, Lewis-Hall, Freda, March, Andrew N., Shore, Carolyn K., Tenaerts, Pamela, Rutter, Joni L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10346039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37456265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.541
_version_ 1785073224994783232
author Buse, John B.
Austin, Christopher P.
Johnston, S. Claiborne
Lewis-Hall, Freda
March, Andrew N.
Shore, Carolyn K.
Tenaerts, Pamela
Rutter, Joni L.
author_facet Buse, John B.
Austin, Christopher P.
Johnston, S. Claiborne
Lewis-Hall, Freda
March, Andrew N.
Shore, Carolyn K.
Tenaerts, Pamela
Rutter, Joni L.
author_sort Buse, John B.
collection PubMed
description Clinical trial processes are unnecessarily inefficient and costly, slowing the translation of medical discoveries into treatments for people living with disease. To reduce redundancies and inefficiencies, a group of clinical trial experts developed a framework for clinical trial site readiness based on existing trial site qualifications from sponsors. The site readiness practices are encompassed within six domains: research team, infrastructure, study management, data collection and management, quality oversight, and ethics and safety. Implementation of this framework for clinical trial sites would reduce inefficiencies in trial conduct and help prepare new sites to enter the clinical trials enterprise, with the potential to improve the reach of clinical trials to underserved communities. Moreover, the framework holds benefits for trial sponsors, contract research organizations, trade associations, trial participants, and the public. For novice sites considering future trials, we provide a framework for site preparation and the engagement of stakeholders. For experienced sites, the framework can be used to assess current practices and inform and engage sponsors, staff, and participants. Details in the supplementary materials provide easy access to key regulatory documents and resources. Invited perspective articles provide greater depth from a systems, DEIA (diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility) and decentralized trials perspective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10346039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103460392023-07-15 A framework for assessing clinical trial site readiness Buse, John B. Austin, Christopher P. Johnston, S. Claiborne Lewis-Hall, Freda March, Andrew N. Shore, Carolyn K. Tenaerts, Pamela Rutter, Joni L. J Clin Transl Sci Special Communications Clinical trial processes are unnecessarily inefficient and costly, slowing the translation of medical discoveries into treatments for people living with disease. To reduce redundancies and inefficiencies, a group of clinical trial experts developed a framework for clinical trial site readiness based on existing trial site qualifications from sponsors. The site readiness practices are encompassed within six domains: research team, infrastructure, study management, data collection and management, quality oversight, and ethics and safety. Implementation of this framework for clinical trial sites would reduce inefficiencies in trial conduct and help prepare new sites to enter the clinical trials enterprise, with the potential to improve the reach of clinical trials to underserved communities. Moreover, the framework holds benefits for trial sponsors, contract research organizations, trade associations, trial participants, and the public. For novice sites considering future trials, we provide a framework for site preparation and the engagement of stakeholders. For experienced sites, the framework can be used to assess current practices and inform and engage sponsors, staff, and participants. Details in the supplementary materials provide easy access to key regulatory documents and resources. Invited perspective articles provide greater depth from a systems, DEIA (diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility) and decentralized trials perspective. Cambridge University Press 2023-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10346039/ /pubmed/37456265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.541 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Communications
Buse, John B.
Austin, Christopher P.
Johnston, S. Claiborne
Lewis-Hall, Freda
March, Andrew N.
Shore, Carolyn K.
Tenaerts, Pamela
Rutter, Joni L.
A framework for assessing clinical trial site readiness
title A framework for assessing clinical trial site readiness
title_full A framework for assessing clinical trial site readiness
title_fullStr A framework for assessing clinical trial site readiness
title_full_unstemmed A framework for assessing clinical trial site readiness
title_short A framework for assessing clinical trial site readiness
title_sort framework for assessing clinical trial site readiness
topic Special Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10346039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37456265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.541
work_keys_str_mv AT busejohnb aframeworkforassessingclinicaltrialsitereadiness
AT austinchristopherp aframeworkforassessingclinicaltrialsitereadiness
AT johnstonsclaiborne aframeworkforassessingclinicaltrialsitereadiness
AT lewishallfreda aframeworkforassessingclinicaltrialsitereadiness
AT marchandrewn aframeworkforassessingclinicaltrialsitereadiness
AT shorecarolynk aframeworkforassessingclinicaltrialsitereadiness
AT tenaertspamela aframeworkforassessingclinicaltrialsitereadiness
AT rutterjonil aframeworkforassessingclinicaltrialsitereadiness
AT busejohnb frameworkforassessingclinicaltrialsitereadiness
AT austinchristopherp frameworkforassessingclinicaltrialsitereadiness
AT johnstonsclaiborne frameworkforassessingclinicaltrialsitereadiness
AT lewishallfreda frameworkforassessingclinicaltrialsitereadiness
AT marchandrewn frameworkforassessingclinicaltrialsitereadiness
AT shorecarolynk frameworkforassessingclinicaltrialsitereadiness
AT tenaertspamela frameworkforassessingclinicaltrialsitereadiness
AT rutterjonil frameworkforassessingclinicaltrialsitereadiness