Cargando…
Do Concomitant Systematic Biopsies Add to Fusion Targeted Biopsies in the Diagnosis and Management of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer?
OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy clearly detects more clinically significant prostate cancer than systematic biopsy. Whether concomitant systematic biopsy adds to targeted biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer remains uncertain. The primary outcome me...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Turkish Association of Urology
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10346108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37877866 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/tud.2023.22221 |
_version_ | 1785073236895072256 |
---|---|
author | Thompson, Alice Eguru, Venkat Moosa, Sohail Ng, Yeung |
author_facet | Thompson, Alice Eguru, Venkat Moosa, Sohail Ng, Yeung |
author_sort | Thompson, Alice |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy clearly detects more clinically significant prostate cancer than systematic biopsy. Whether concomitant systematic biopsy adds to targeted biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer remains uncertain. The primary outcome measure of this study was to ascertain the percentage of clinically significant prostate cancer on systematic biopsy missed by targeted biopsy. Furthermore, we sought to determine whether systematic biopsy results influenced the clinical management of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective observational study included all men undergoing Fusion targeted biopsy in our Health Board. All men had PI-RADS scores of 3-5 on magnetic resonance imaging. Histology from targeted biopsy and systematic biopsy was reviewed to determine any additional benefit of performing systematic biopsy. Clinical outcomes were also reviewed. Clinically significant prostate cancer was defined by (i) International Society of Urological Pathology ≥ 2 and (ii) UCL criteria of any primary Gleason 4 or core length ≥ 6 mm. RESULTS: A total of 104 men were included in the study of whom 18 patients were biopsy naïve, 65 had at least 1 previous negative biopsy, and 20 had previous biopsies that showed clinically insignificant cancer. The percentage of clinically significant prostate cancer missed on targeted biopsy was between 9.1% and 11.1%. Moreover, 17.1% of patients with clinically significant prostate cancer would not have proceeded to radical treatment if the systematic biopsy had not been performed. CONCLUSION: Our data support a growing field of evidence that although magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy is more sensitive than systematic biopsy at detecting clinically significant prostate cancer, systematic biopsy adds to the number of patients diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer in those already undergoing prostate biopsy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10346108 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Turkish Association of Urology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103461082023-07-15 Do Concomitant Systematic Biopsies Add to Fusion Targeted Biopsies in the Diagnosis and Management of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer? Thompson, Alice Eguru, Venkat Moosa, Sohail Ng, Yeung Urol Res Pract Original Article OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy clearly detects more clinically significant prostate cancer than systematic biopsy. Whether concomitant systematic biopsy adds to targeted biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer remains uncertain. The primary outcome measure of this study was to ascertain the percentage of clinically significant prostate cancer on systematic biopsy missed by targeted biopsy. Furthermore, we sought to determine whether systematic biopsy results influenced the clinical management of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective observational study included all men undergoing Fusion targeted biopsy in our Health Board. All men had PI-RADS scores of 3-5 on magnetic resonance imaging. Histology from targeted biopsy and systematic biopsy was reviewed to determine any additional benefit of performing systematic biopsy. Clinical outcomes were also reviewed. Clinically significant prostate cancer was defined by (i) International Society of Urological Pathology ≥ 2 and (ii) UCL criteria of any primary Gleason 4 or core length ≥ 6 mm. RESULTS: A total of 104 men were included in the study of whom 18 patients were biopsy naïve, 65 had at least 1 previous negative biopsy, and 20 had previous biopsies that showed clinically insignificant cancer. The percentage of clinically significant prostate cancer missed on targeted biopsy was between 9.1% and 11.1%. Moreover, 17.1% of patients with clinically significant prostate cancer would not have proceeded to radical treatment if the systematic biopsy had not been performed. CONCLUSION: Our data support a growing field of evidence that although magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy is more sensitive than systematic biopsy at detecting clinically significant prostate cancer, systematic biopsy adds to the number of patients diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer in those already undergoing prostate biopsy. Turkish Association of Urology 2023-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10346108/ /pubmed/37877866 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/tud.2023.22221 Text en © 2023 authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Article Thompson, Alice Eguru, Venkat Moosa, Sohail Ng, Yeung Do Concomitant Systematic Biopsies Add to Fusion Targeted Biopsies in the Diagnosis and Management of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer? |
title | Do Concomitant Systematic Biopsies Add to Fusion Targeted Biopsies in the Diagnosis and Management of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer? |
title_full | Do Concomitant Systematic Biopsies Add to Fusion Targeted Biopsies in the Diagnosis and Management of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer? |
title_fullStr | Do Concomitant Systematic Biopsies Add to Fusion Targeted Biopsies in the Diagnosis and Management of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer? |
title_full_unstemmed | Do Concomitant Systematic Biopsies Add to Fusion Targeted Biopsies in the Diagnosis and Management of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer? |
title_short | Do Concomitant Systematic Biopsies Add to Fusion Targeted Biopsies in the Diagnosis and Management of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer? |
title_sort | do concomitant systematic biopsies add to fusion targeted biopsies in the diagnosis and management of clinically significant prostate cancer? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10346108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37877866 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/tud.2023.22221 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thompsonalice doconcomitantsystematicbiopsiesaddtofusiontargetedbiopsiesinthediagnosisandmanagementofclinicallysignificantprostatecancer AT eguruvenkat doconcomitantsystematicbiopsiesaddtofusiontargetedbiopsiesinthediagnosisandmanagementofclinicallysignificantprostatecancer AT moosasohail doconcomitantsystematicbiopsiesaddtofusiontargetedbiopsiesinthediagnosisandmanagementofclinicallysignificantprostatecancer AT ngyeung doconcomitantsystematicbiopsiesaddtofusiontargetedbiopsiesinthediagnosisandmanagementofclinicallysignificantprostatecancer |