Cargando…

Best Procedures for Leaf and Stem Water Potential Measurements in Grapevine: Cultivar and Water Status Matter

The pressure chamber is the most used tool for plant water status monitoring. However, species/cultivar and seasonal effects on protocols for reliable water potential determination have not been properly tested. In four grapevine cultivars and two times of the season (early season, Es; late season,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tomasella, Martina, Calderan, Alberto, Mihelčič, Alenka, Petruzzellis, Francesco, Braidotti, Riccardo, Natale, Sara, Lisjak, Klemen, Sivilotti, Paolo, Nardini, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10346302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37446973
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12132412
_version_ 1785073283059679232
author Tomasella, Martina
Calderan, Alberto
Mihelčič, Alenka
Petruzzellis, Francesco
Braidotti, Riccardo
Natale, Sara
Lisjak, Klemen
Sivilotti, Paolo
Nardini, Andrea
author_facet Tomasella, Martina
Calderan, Alberto
Mihelčič, Alenka
Petruzzellis, Francesco
Braidotti, Riccardo
Natale, Sara
Lisjak, Klemen
Sivilotti, Paolo
Nardini, Andrea
author_sort Tomasella, Martina
collection PubMed
description The pressure chamber is the most used tool for plant water status monitoring. However, species/cultivar and seasonal effects on protocols for reliable water potential determination have not been properly tested. In four grapevine cultivars and two times of the season (early season, Es; late season, Ls, under moderate drought), we assessed the maximum sample storage time before leaf water potential (Ψ(leaf)) measurements and the minimum equilibration time for stem water potential (Ψ(stem)) determination, taking 24 h leaf cover as control. In ‘Pinot gris’, Ψ(leaf) already decreased after 1 h leaf storage in both campaigns, dropping by 0.4/0.5 MPa after 3 h, while in ‘Refosk’, it decreased by 0.1 MPa after 1 and 2 h in Es and Ls, respectively. In ‘Merlot’ and ‘Merlot Kanthus’, even 3 h storage did not affect Ψ(leaf). In Es, the minimum Ψ(stem) equilibration was 1 h for ‘Refošk’ and 10 min for ‘Pinot gris’ and ‘Merlot’. In Ls, ‘Merlot Kanthus’ required more than 2 h equilibration, while 1 h to 10 min was sufficient for the other cultivars. The observed cultivar and seasonal differences indicate that the proposed tests should be routinely performed prior to experiments to define ad hoc procedures for water status determination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10346302
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103463022023-07-15 Best Procedures for Leaf and Stem Water Potential Measurements in Grapevine: Cultivar and Water Status Matter Tomasella, Martina Calderan, Alberto Mihelčič, Alenka Petruzzellis, Francesco Braidotti, Riccardo Natale, Sara Lisjak, Klemen Sivilotti, Paolo Nardini, Andrea Plants (Basel) Article The pressure chamber is the most used tool for plant water status monitoring. However, species/cultivar and seasonal effects on protocols for reliable water potential determination have not been properly tested. In four grapevine cultivars and two times of the season (early season, Es; late season, Ls, under moderate drought), we assessed the maximum sample storage time before leaf water potential (Ψ(leaf)) measurements and the minimum equilibration time for stem water potential (Ψ(stem)) determination, taking 24 h leaf cover as control. In ‘Pinot gris’, Ψ(leaf) already decreased after 1 h leaf storage in both campaigns, dropping by 0.4/0.5 MPa after 3 h, while in ‘Refosk’, it decreased by 0.1 MPa after 1 and 2 h in Es and Ls, respectively. In ‘Merlot’ and ‘Merlot Kanthus’, even 3 h storage did not affect Ψ(leaf). In Es, the minimum Ψ(stem) equilibration was 1 h for ‘Refošk’ and 10 min for ‘Pinot gris’ and ‘Merlot’. In Ls, ‘Merlot Kanthus’ required more than 2 h equilibration, while 1 h to 10 min was sufficient for the other cultivars. The observed cultivar and seasonal differences indicate that the proposed tests should be routinely performed prior to experiments to define ad hoc procedures for water status determination. MDPI 2023-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10346302/ /pubmed/37446973 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12132412 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tomasella, Martina
Calderan, Alberto
Mihelčič, Alenka
Petruzzellis, Francesco
Braidotti, Riccardo
Natale, Sara
Lisjak, Klemen
Sivilotti, Paolo
Nardini, Andrea
Best Procedures for Leaf and Stem Water Potential Measurements in Grapevine: Cultivar and Water Status Matter
title Best Procedures for Leaf and Stem Water Potential Measurements in Grapevine: Cultivar and Water Status Matter
title_full Best Procedures for Leaf and Stem Water Potential Measurements in Grapevine: Cultivar and Water Status Matter
title_fullStr Best Procedures for Leaf and Stem Water Potential Measurements in Grapevine: Cultivar and Water Status Matter
title_full_unstemmed Best Procedures for Leaf and Stem Water Potential Measurements in Grapevine: Cultivar and Water Status Matter
title_short Best Procedures for Leaf and Stem Water Potential Measurements in Grapevine: Cultivar and Water Status Matter
title_sort best procedures for leaf and stem water potential measurements in grapevine: cultivar and water status matter
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10346302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37446973
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12132412
work_keys_str_mv AT tomasellamartina bestproceduresforleafandstemwaterpotentialmeasurementsingrapevinecultivarandwaterstatusmatter
AT calderanalberto bestproceduresforleafandstemwaterpotentialmeasurementsingrapevinecultivarandwaterstatusmatter
AT mihelcicalenka bestproceduresforleafandstemwaterpotentialmeasurementsingrapevinecultivarandwaterstatusmatter
AT petruzzellisfrancesco bestproceduresforleafandstemwaterpotentialmeasurementsingrapevinecultivarandwaterstatusmatter
AT braidottiriccardo bestproceduresforleafandstemwaterpotentialmeasurementsingrapevinecultivarandwaterstatusmatter
AT natalesara bestproceduresforleafandstemwaterpotentialmeasurementsingrapevinecultivarandwaterstatusmatter
AT lisjakklemen bestproceduresforleafandstemwaterpotentialmeasurementsingrapevinecultivarandwaterstatusmatter
AT sivilottipaolo bestproceduresforleafandstemwaterpotentialmeasurementsingrapevinecultivarandwaterstatusmatter
AT nardiniandrea bestproceduresforleafandstemwaterpotentialmeasurementsingrapevinecultivarandwaterstatusmatter