Cargando…
Best Procedures for Leaf and Stem Water Potential Measurements in Grapevine: Cultivar and Water Status Matter
The pressure chamber is the most used tool for plant water status monitoring. However, species/cultivar and seasonal effects on protocols for reliable water potential determination have not been properly tested. In four grapevine cultivars and two times of the season (early season, Es; late season,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10346302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37446973 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12132412 |
_version_ | 1785073283059679232 |
---|---|
author | Tomasella, Martina Calderan, Alberto Mihelčič, Alenka Petruzzellis, Francesco Braidotti, Riccardo Natale, Sara Lisjak, Klemen Sivilotti, Paolo Nardini, Andrea |
author_facet | Tomasella, Martina Calderan, Alberto Mihelčič, Alenka Petruzzellis, Francesco Braidotti, Riccardo Natale, Sara Lisjak, Klemen Sivilotti, Paolo Nardini, Andrea |
author_sort | Tomasella, Martina |
collection | PubMed |
description | The pressure chamber is the most used tool for plant water status monitoring. However, species/cultivar and seasonal effects on protocols for reliable water potential determination have not been properly tested. In four grapevine cultivars and two times of the season (early season, Es; late season, Ls, under moderate drought), we assessed the maximum sample storage time before leaf water potential (Ψ(leaf)) measurements and the minimum equilibration time for stem water potential (Ψ(stem)) determination, taking 24 h leaf cover as control. In ‘Pinot gris’, Ψ(leaf) already decreased after 1 h leaf storage in both campaigns, dropping by 0.4/0.5 MPa after 3 h, while in ‘Refosk’, it decreased by 0.1 MPa after 1 and 2 h in Es and Ls, respectively. In ‘Merlot’ and ‘Merlot Kanthus’, even 3 h storage did not affect Ψ(leaf). In Es, the minimum Ψ(stem) equilibration was 1 h for ‘Refošk’ and 10 min for ‘Pinot gris’ and ‘Merlot’. In Ls, ‘Merlot Kanthus’ required more than 2 h equilibration, while 1 h to 10 min was sufficient for the other cultivars. The observed cultivar and seasonal differences indicate that the proposed tests should be routinely performed prior to experiments to define ad hoc procedures for water status determination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10346302 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103463022023-07-15 Best Procedures for Leaf and Stem Water Potential Measurements in Grapevine: Cultivar and Water Status Matter Tomasella, Martina Calderan, Alberto Mihelčič, Alenka Petruzzellis, Francesco Braidotti, Riccardo Natale, Sara Lisjak, Klemen Sivilotti, Paolo Nardini, Andrea Plants (Basel) Article The pressure chamber is the most used tool for plant water status monitoring. However, species/cultivar and seasonal effects on protocols for reliable water potential determination have not been properly tested. In four grapevine cultivars and two times of the season (early season, Es; late season, Ls, under moderate drought), we assessed the maximum sample storage time before leaf water potential (Ψ(leaf)) measurements and the minimum equilibration time for stem water potential (Ψ(stem)) determination, taking 24 h leaf cover as control. In ‘Pinot gris’, Ψ(leaf) already decreased after 1 h leaf storage in both campaigns, dropping by 0.4/0.5 MPa after 3 h, while in ‘Refosk’, it decreased by 0.1 MPa after 1 and 2 h in Es and Ls, respectively. In ‘Merlot’ and ‘Merlot Kanthus’, even 3 h storage did not affect Ψ(leaf). In Es, the minimum Ψ(stem) equilibration was 1 h for ‘Refošk’ and 10 min for ‘Pinot gris’ and ‘Merlot’. In Ls, ‘Merlot Kanthus’ required more than 2 h equilibration, while 1 h to 10 min was sufficient for the other cultivars. The observed cultivar and seasonal differences indicate that the proposed tests should be routinely performed prior to experiments to define ad hoc procedures for water status determination. MDPI 2023-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10346302/ /pubmed/37446973 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12132412 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Tomasella, Martina Calderan, Alberto Mihelčič, Alenka Petruzzellis, Francesco Braidotti, Riccardo Natale, Sara Lisjak, Klemen Sivilotti, Paolo Nardini, Andrea Best Procedures for Leaf and Stem Water Potential Measurements in Grapevine: Cultivar and Water Status Matter |
title | Best Procedures for Leaf and Stem Water Potential Measurements in Grapevine: Cultivar and Water Status Matter |
title_full | Best Procedures for Leaf and Stem Water Potential Measurements in Grapevine: Cultivar and Water Status Matter |
title_fullStr | Best Procedures for Leaf and Stem Water Potential Measurements in Grapevine: Cultivar and Water Status Matter |
title_full_unstemmed | Best Procedures for Leaf and Stem Water Potential Measurements in Grapevine: Cultivar and Water Status Matter |
title_short | Best Procedures for Leaf and Stem Water Potential Measurements in Grapevine: Cultivar and Water Status Matter |
title_sort | best procedures for leaf and stem water potential measurements in grapevine: cultivar and water status matter |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10346302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37446973 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12132412 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tomasellamartina bestproceduresforleafandstemwaterpotentialmeasurementsingrapevinecultivarandwaterstatusmatter AT calderanalberto bestproceduresforleafandstemwaterpotentialmeasurementsingrapevinecultivarandwaterstatusmatter AT mihelcicalenka bestproceduresforleafandstemwaterpotentialmeasurementsingrapevinecultivarandwaterstatusmatter AT petruzzellisfrancesco bestproceduresforleafandstemwaterpotentialmeasurementsingrapevinecultivarandwaterstatusmatter AT braidottiriccardo bestproceduresforleafandstemwaterpotentialmeasurementsingrapevinecultivarandwaterstatusmatter AT natalesara bestproceduresforleafandstemwaterpotentialmeasurementsingrapevinecultivarandwaterstatusmatter AT lisjakklemen bestproceduresforleafandstemwaterpotentialmeasurementsingrapevinecultivarandwaterstatusmatter AT sivilottipaolo bestproceduresforleafandstemwaterpotentialmeasurementsingrapevinecultivarandwaterstatusmatter AT nardiniandrea bestproceduresforleafandstemwaterpotentialmeasurementsingrapevinecultivarandwaterstatusmatter |