Cargando…

A Sensor-Based Feedback Device Stimulating Daily Life Upper Extremity Activity in Stroke Patients: A Feasibility Study

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and explore the efficacy of the Arm Activity Tracker (AAT). The AAT is a device based on wrist-worn accelerometers that provides visual and tactile feedback to stimulate daily life upper extremity (UE) activity in stroke patients. Methods: A randomised, cr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Langerak, Anthonia J., Regterschot, Gerrit Ruben Hendrik, Evers, Marc, van Beijnum, Bert-Jan F., Meskers, Carel G. M., Selles, Ruud W., Ribbers, Gerard M., Bussmann, Johannes B. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10346467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37447718
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23135868
_version_ 1785073320480210944
author Langerak, Anthonia J.
Regterschot, Gerrit Ruben Hendrik
Evers, Marc
van Beijnum, Bert-Jan F.
Meskers, Carel G. M.
Selles, Ruud W.
Ribbers, Gerard M.
Bussmann, Johannes B. J.
author_facet Langerak, Anthonia J.
Regterschot, Gerrit Ruben Hendrik
Evers, Marc
van Beijnum, Bert-Jan F.
Meskers, Carel G. M.
Selles, Ruud W.
Ribbers, Gerard M.
Bussmann, Johannes B. J.
author_sort Langerak, Anthonia J.
collection PubMed
description This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and explore the efficacy of the Arm Activity Tracker (AAT). The AAT is a device based on wrist-worn accelerometers that provides visual and tactile feedback to stimulate daily life upper extremity (UE) activity in stroke patients. Methods: A randomised, crossover within-subject study was conducted in sub-acute stroke patients admitted to a rehabilitation centre. Feasibility encompassed (1) adherence: the dropout rate and the number of participants with insufficient AAT data collection; (2) acceptance: the technology acceptance model (range: 7–112) and (3) usability: the system usability scale (range: 0–100). A two-way ANOVA was used to estimate the difference between the baseline, intervention and control conditions for (1) paretic UE activity and (2) UE activity ratio. Results: Seventeen stroke patients were included. A 29% dropout rate was observed, and two participants had insufficient data collection. Participants who adhered to the study reported good acceptance (median (IQR): 94 (77–111)) and usability (median (IQR): 77.5 (75–78.5)-). We found small to medium effect sizes favouring the intervention condition for paretic UE activity (η(2)G = 0.07, p = 0.04) and ratio (η(2)G = 0.11, p = 0.22). Conclusion: Participants who adhered to the study showed good acceptance and usability of the AAT and increased paretic UE activity. Dropouts should be further evaluated, and a sufficiently powered trial should be performed to analyse efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10346467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103464672023-07-15 A Sensor-Based Feedback Device Stimulating Daily Life Upper Extremity Activity in Stroke Patients: A Feasibility Study Langerak, Anthonia J. Regterschot, Gerrit Ruben Hendrik Evers, Marc van Beijnum, Bert-Jan F. Meskers, Carel G. M. Selles, Ruud W. Ribbers, Gerard M. Bussmann, Johannes B. J. Sensors (Basel) Article This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and explore the efficacy of the Arm Activity Tracker (AAT). The AAT is a device based on wrist-worn accelerometers that provides visual and tactile feedback to stimulate daily life upper extremity (UE) activity in stroke patients. Methods: A randomised, crossover within-subject study was conducted in sub-acute stroke patients admitted to a rehabilitation centre. Feasibility encompassed (1) adherence: the dropout rate and the number of participants with insufficient AAT data collection; (2) acceptance: the technology acceptance model (range: 7–112) and (3) usability: the system usability scale (range: 0–100). A two-way ANOVA was used to estimate the difference between the baseline, intervention and control conditions for (1) paretic UE activity and (2) UE activity ratio. Results: Seventeen stroke patients were included. A 29% dropout rate was observed, and two participants had insufficient data collection. Participants who adhered to the study reported good acceptance (median (IQR): 94 (77–111)) and usability (median (IQR): 77.5 (75–78.5)-). We found small to medium effect sizes favouring the intervention condition for paretic UE activity (η(2)G = 0.07, p = 0.04) and ratio (η(2)G = 0.11, p = 0.22). Conclusion: Participants who adhered to the study showed good acceptance and usability of the AAT and increased paretic UE activity. Dropouts should be further evaluated, and a sufficiently powered trial should be performed to analyse efficacy. MDPI 2023-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10346467/ /pubmed/37447718 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23135868 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Langerak, Anthonia J.
Regterschot, Gerrit Ruben Hendrik
Evers, Marc
van Beijnum, Bert-Jan F.
Meskers, Carel G. M.
Selles, Ruud W.
Ribbers, Gerard M.
Bussmann, Johannes B. J.
A Sensor-Based Feedback Device Stimulating Daily Life Upper Extremity Activity in Stroke Patients: A Feasibility Study
title A Sensor-Based Feedback Device Stimulating Daily Life Upper Extremity Activity in Stroke Patients: A Feasibility Study
title_full A Sensor-Based Feedback Device Stimulating Daily Life Upper Extremity Activity in Stroke Patients: A Feasibility Study
title_fullStr A Sensor-Based Feedback Device Stimulating Daily Life Upper Extremity Activity in Stroke Patients: A Feasibility Study
title_full_unstemmed A Sensor-Based Feedback Device Stimulating Daily Life Upper Extremity Activity in Stroke Patients: A Feasibility Study
title_short A Sensor-Based Feedback Device Stimulating Daily Life Upper Extremity Activity in Stroke Patients: A Feasibility Study
title_sort sensor-based feedback device stimulating daily life upper extremity activity in stroke patients: a feasibility study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10346467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37447718
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23135868
work_keys_str_mv AT langerakanthoniaj asensorbasedfeedbackdevicestimulatingdailylifeupperextremityactivityinstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT regterschotgerritrubenhendrik asensorbasedfeedbackdevicestimulatingdailylifeupperextremityactivityinstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT eversmarc asensorbasedfeedbackdevicestimulatingdailylifeupperextremityactivityinstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT vanbeijnumbertjanf asensorbasedfeedbackdevicestimulatingdailylifeupperextremityactivityinstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT meskerscarelgm asensorbasedfeedbackdevicestimulatingdailylifeupperextremityactivityinstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT sellesruudw asensorbasedfeedbackdevicestimulatingdailylifeupperextremityactivityinstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT ribbersgerardm asensorbasedfeedbackdevicestimulatingdailylifeupperextremityactivityinstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT bussmannjohannesbj asensorbasedfeedbackdevicestimulatingdailylifeupperextremityactivityinstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT langerakanthoniaj sensorbasedfeedbackdevicestimulatingdailylifeupperextremityactivityinstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT regterschotgerritrubenhendrik sensorbasedfeedbackdevicestimulatingdailylifeupperextremityactivityinstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT eversmarc sensorbasedfeedbackdevicestimulatingdailylifeupperextremityactivityinstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT vanbeijnumbertjanf sensorbasedfeedbackdevicestimulatingdailylifeupperextremityactivityinstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT meskerscarelgm sensorbasedfeedbackdevicestimulatingdailylifeupperextremityactivityinstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT sellesruudw sensorbasedfeedbackdevicestimulatingdailylifeupperextremityactivityinstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT ribbersgerardm sensorbasedfeedbackdevicestimulatingdailylifeupperextremityactivityinstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT bussmannjohannesbj sensorbasedfeedbackdevicestimulatingdailylifeupperextremityactivityinstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy