Cargando…

Safety of non‑peptide thrombopoietin receptor agonists in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of short‑term double‑blind randomized clinical trials

The aim of the present study was to analyze the safety of non-peptide thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) treatment. All studies reporting adverse events (AEs) in relation to ITP treatment with eltrombopag, avatrombopag, and hetrombopag were retrieved from Pu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shen, Nan, Qiao, Jibing, Jiang, Yazhou, Yin, Hanjun, Li, Min, Zhu, Suyue, Li, Jianqin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10347292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37456173
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.12092
_version_ 1785073515861377024
author Shen, Nan
Qiao, Jibing
Jiang, Yazhou
Yin, Hanjun
Li, Min
Zhu, Suyue
Li, Jianqin
author_facet Shen, Nan
Qiao, Jibing
Jiang, Yazhou
Yin, Hanjun
Li, Min
Zhu, Suyue
Li, Jianqin
author_sort Shen, Nan
collection PubMed
description The aim of the present study was to analyze the safety of non-peptide thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) treatment. All studies reporting adverse events (AEs) in relation to ITP treatment with eltrombopag, avatrombopag, and hetrombopag were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. RevMan 5.4.1 was used for meta-analysis, heterogeneity and bias analyses. A total of 1,078 patients from seven eligible studies were enrolled. In the enrolled clinical trials, the double-blind period was between 6 weeks and 6 months. The results revealed that the chances of any AEs [relative risk (RR)=1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.90-1.51; I(2)=78%; P=0.26], grade 3/4 AEs (RR=1.07; 95% CI, 0.63-1.80; I(2)=0%; P=0.81), elevated transaminase levels (RR=1.09; 95% CI, 0.68-1.74; I(2)=0%; P=0.72), thrombosis (RR=1.92; 95% CI, 0.55-6.66; I(2)=0%; P=0.31) and cataracts (RR=0.83; 95% CI, 0.38-1.83; I(2)=0%; P=0.65) were not significantly higher in patients with ITP that received non-peptide TPO-RAs compared with patients with ITP treated with a placebo. The present study indicated that non-peptide TPO-RAs were relatively safe for patients with ITP, at least within 6 months of administration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10347292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103472922023-07-15 Safety of non‑peptide thrombopoietin receptor agonists in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of short‑term double‑blind randomized clinical trials Shen, Nan Qiao, Jibing Jiang, Yazhou Yin, Hanjun Li, Min Zhu, Suyue Li, Jianqin Exp Ther Med Articles The aim of the present study was to analyze the safety of non-peptide thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) treatment. All studies reporting adverse events (AEs) in relation to ITP treatment with eltrombopag, avatrombopag, and hetrombopag were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. RevMan 5.4.1 was used for meta-analysis, heterogeneity and bias analyses. A total of 1,078 patients from seven eligible studies were enrolled. In the enrolled clinical trials, the double-blind period was between 6 weeks and 6 months. The results revealed that the chances of any AEs [relative risk (RR)=1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.90-1.51; I(2)=78%; P=0.26], grade 3/4 AEs (RR=1.07; 95% CI, 0.63-1.80; I(2)=0%; P=0.81), elevated transaminase levels (RR=1.09; 95% CI, 0.68-1.74; I(2)=0%; P=0.72), thrombosis (RR=1.92; 95% CI, 0.55-6.66; I(2)=0%; P=0.31) and cataracts (RR=0.83; 95% CI, 0.38-1.83; I(2)=0%; P=0.65) were not significantly higher in patients with ITP that received non-peptide TPO-RAs compared with patients with ITP treated with a placebo. The present study indicated that non-peptide TPO-RAs were relatively safe for patients with ITP, at least within 6 months of administration. D.A. Spandidos 2023-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10347292/ /pubmed/37456173 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.12092 Text en Copyright: © Shen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Shen, Nan
Qiao, Jibing
Jiang, Yazhou
Yin, Hanjun
Li, Min
Zhu, Suyue
Li, Jianqin
Safety of non‑peptide thrombopoietin receptor agonists in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of short‑term double‑blind randomized clinical trials
title Safety of non‑peptide thrombopoietin receptor agonists in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of short‑term double‑blind randomized clinical trials
title_full Safety of non‑peptide thrombopoietin receptor agonists in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of short‑term double‑blind randomized clinical trials
title_fullStr Safety of non‑peptide thrombopoietin receptor agonists in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of short‑term double‑blind randomized clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Safety of non‑peptide thrombopoietin receptor agonists in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of short‑term double‑blind randomized clinical trials
title_short Safety of non‑peptide thrombopoietin receptor agonists in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of short‑term double‑blind randomized clinical trials
title_sort safety of non‑peptide thrombopoietin receptor agonists in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta‑analysis of short‑term double‑blind randomized clinical trials
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10347292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37456173
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.12092
work_keys_str_mv AT shennan safetyofnonpeptidethrombopoietinreceptoragonistsinpatientswithimmunethrombocytopeniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofshorttermdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT qiaojibing safetyofnonpeptidethrombopoietinreceptoragonistsinpatientswithimmunethrombocytopeniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofshorttermdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT jiangyazhou safetyofnonpeptidethrombopoietinreceptoragonistsinpatientswithimmunethrombocytopeniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofshorttermdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT yinhanjun safetyofnonpeptidethrombopoietinreceptoragonistsinpatientswithimmunethrombocytopeniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofshorttermdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT limin safetyofnonpeptidethrombopoietinreceptoragonistsinpatientswithimmunethrombocytopeniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofshorttermdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT zhusuyue safetyofnonpeptidethrombopoietinreceptoragonistsinpatientswithimmunethrombocytopeniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofshorttermdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT lijianqin safetyofnonpeptidethrombopoietinreceptoragonistsinpatientswithimmunethrombocytopeniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofshorttermdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrials