Cargando…

Rehabilitation outcomes for people with lung cancer (UNITE): protocol for the development of a core outcome set

INTRODUCTION: With treatment-related improvements in survival, rehabilitation is essential to improve function and health-related quality of life and manage the high symptom burden associated with lung cancer. Despite this, significant heterogeneity exists in the outcomes and instruments used to eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edbrooke, Lara, Granger, Catherine L, Francis, Jill J, John, Tom, Kaadan, Nasreen, Halloran, Emma, Connolly, Bronwen, Denehy, Linda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10347493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37336620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001571
_version_ 1785073559706533888
author Edbrooke, Lara
Granger, Catherine L
Francis, Jill J
John, Tom
Kaadan, Nasreen
Halloran, Emma
Connolly, Bronwen
Denehy, Linda
author_facet Edbrooke, Lara
Granger, Catherine L
Francis, Jill J
John, Tom
Kaadan, Nasreen
Halloran, Emma
Connolly, Bronwen
Denehy, Linda
author_sort Edbrooke, Lara
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: With treatment-related improvements in survival, rehabilitation is essential to improve function and health-related quality of life and manage the high symptom burden associated with lung cancer. Despite this, significant heterogeneity exists in the outcomes and instruments used to evaluate lung cancer rehabilitation programme impact. This study aims to develop a core set of clinically relevant lung cancer rehabilitation outcomes for use in clinical practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An international Delphi consensus study involving consumer, healthcare professional and researcher stakeholders to determine which outcomes to include and how to measure these. Stage 1 (preliminary): mixed methods to develop the potential list of outcomes (1) overview of systematic reviews of lung cancer exercise interventions and (2) focus groups and individual interviews with people with lung cancer. Stage 2: outcomes were grouped according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health domains. Stage 3: to determine priority outcomes for core outcome set (COS) inclusion participants will rate each outcome’s importance (one-nine-point Likert scale) over two-three survey rounds. Stage 4: following review by the steering committee, a consensus meeting will be held if agreement on the COS has not been reached. Stage 5: recommendations will be made regarding a single instrument for measuring each COS outcome by reviewing existing resources where consensus has already been reached. Where resources do not exist the quality and feasibility of potential measurement instruments will be appraised, and the Delphi consensus survey and meeting process outlined in stages 3–4 will be repeated. This protocol adheres to the COS-Standardised Protocol statement and will be conducted and reported according to the COS-Standards for Development recommendations and the COS-Standards for Reporting. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval (20/9/22, University of Melbourne ID 2022-24839-32231-3). Dissemination in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10347493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103474932023-07-15 Rehabilitation outcomes for people with lung cancer (UNITE): protocol for the development of a core outcome set Edbrooke, Lara Granger, Catherine L Francis, Jill J John, Tom Kaadan, Nasreen Halloran, Emma Connolly, Bronwen Denehy, Linda BMJ Open Respir Res Lung Cancer INTRODUCTION: With treatment-related improvements in survival, rehabilitation is essential to improve function and health-related quality of life and manage the high symptom burden associated with lung cancer. Despite this, significant heterogeneity exists in the outcomes and instruments used to evaluate lung cancer rehabilitation programme impact. This study aims to develop a core set of clinically relevant lung cancer rehabilitation outcomes for use in clinical practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An international Delphi consensus study involving consumer, healthcare professional and researcher stakeholders to determine which outcomes to include and how to measure these. Stage 1 (preliminary): mixed methods to develop the potential list of outcomes (1) overview of systematic reviews of lung cancer exercise interventions and (2) focus groups and individual interviews with people with lung cancer. Stage 2: outcomes were grouped according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health domains. Stage 3: to determine priority outcomes for core outcome set (COS) inclusion participants will rate each outcome’s importance (one-nine-point Likert scale) over two-three survey rounds. Stage 4: following review by the steering committee, a consensus meeting will be held if agreement on the COS has not been reached. Stage 5: recommendations will be made regarding a single instrument for measuring each COS outcome by reviewing existing resources where consensus has already been reached. Where resources do not exist the quality and feasibility of potential measurement instruments will be appraised, and the Delphi consensus survey and meeting process outlined in stages 3–4 will be repeated. This protocol adheres to the COS-Standardised Protocol statement and will be conducted and reported according to the COS-Standards for Development recommendations and the COS-Standards for Reporting. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval (20/9/22, University of Melbourne ID 2022-24839-32231-3). Dissemination in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10347493/ /pubmed/37336620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001571 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Lung Cancer
Edbrooke, Lara
Granger, Catherine L
Francis, Jill J
John, Tom
Kaadan, Nasreen
Halloran, Emma
Connolly, Bronwen
Denehy, Linda
Rehabilitation outcomes for people with lung cancer (UNITE): protocol for the development of a core outcome set
title Rehabilitation outcomes for people with lung cancer (UNITE): protocol for the development of a core outcome set
title_full Rehabilitation outcomes for people with lung cancer (UNITE): protocol for the development of a core outcome set
title_fullStr Rehabilitation outcomes for people with lung cancer (UNITE): protocol for the development of a core outcome set
title_full_unstemmed Rehabilitation outcomes for people with lung cancer (UNITE): protocol for the development of a core outcome set
title_short Rehabilitation outcomes for people with lung cancer (UNITE): protocol for the development of a core outcome set
title_sort rehabilitation outcomes for people with lung cancer (unite): protocol for the development of a core outcome set
topic Lung Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10347493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37336620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001571
work_keys_str_mv AT edbrookelara rehabilitationoutcomesforpeoplewithlungcanceruniteprotocolforthedevelopmentofacoreoutcomeset
AT grangercatherinel rehabilitationoutcomesforpeoplewithlungcanceruniteprotocolforthedevelopmentofacoreoutcomeset
AT francisjillj rehabilitationoutcomesforpeoplewithlungcanceruniteprotocolforthedevelopmentofacoreoutcomeset
AT johntom rehabilitationoutcomesforpeoplewithlungcanceruniteprotocolforthedevelopmentofacoreoutcomeset
AT kaadannasreen rehabilitationoutcomesforpeoplewithlungcanceruniteprotocolforthedevelopmentofacoreoutcomeset
AT halloranemma rehabilitationoutcomesforpeoplewithlungcanceruniteprotocolforthedevelopmentofacoreoutcomeset
AT connollybronwen rehabilitationoutcomesforpeoplewithlungcanceruniteprotocolforthedevelopmentofacoreoutcomeset
AT denehylinda rehabilitationoutcomesforpeoplewithlungcanceruniteprotocolforthedevelopmentofacoreoutcomeset