Cargando…

Primary care family physicians’ experiences with clinical integration in qualitative and mixed reviews: a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION: Clinical (service) integration in primary care settings describes how comprehensive care is coordinated by family physicians (FPs) over time across healthcare contexts to meet patient care needs. To improve care integration and healthcare service planning, a systematic approach to unde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tseng, L Olivia, Newton, Christie, Hall, David, Lee, Esther J, Chang, Howard, Poureslami, Iraj, Vasarhelyi, Krisztina, Lacaille, Diane, Mitton, Craig
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10347507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37433736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067576
_version_ 1785073562524057600
author Tseng, L Olivia
Newton, Christie
Hall, David
Lee, Esther J
Chang, Howard
Poureslami, Iraj
Vasarhelyi, Krisztina
Lacaille, Diane
Mitton, Craig
author_facet Tseng, L Olivia
Newton, Christie
Hall, David
Lee, Esther J
Chang, Howard
Poureslami, Iraj
Vasarhelyi, Krisztina
Lacaille, Diane
Mitton, Craig
author_sort Tseng, L Olivia
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Clinical (service) integration in primary care settings describes how comprehensive care is coordinated by family physicians (FPs) over time across healthcare contexts to meet patient care needs. To improve care integration and healthcare service planning, a systematic approach to understanding its numerous influencing factors is paramount. The objective of this study is to generate a comprehensive map of FP-perceived factors influencing clinical integration across diseases and patient demographics. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We developed the protocol with the guidance of the Joanna Briggs Institute systematic review methodology framework. An information specialist built search strategies for MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases using keywords and MeSH terms iteratively collected from a multidisciplinary team. Two reviewers will work independently throughout the study process, from article selection to data analysis. The identified records will be screened by title and abstract and reviewed in the full text against the criteria: FP in primary care (population), clinical integration (concept) and qualitative and mixed reviews published in 2011–2021 (context). We will first describe the characteristics of the review studies. Then, we will extract qualitative, FP-perceived factors and group them by content similarities, such as patient factors. Lastly, we will describe the types of extracted factors using a custom framework. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for a systematic review. The identified factors will help generate an item bank for a survey that will be developed in the Phase II study to ascertain high-impact factors for intervention(s), as well as evidence gaps to guide future research. We will share the study findings with various knowledge users to promote awareness of clinical integration issues through multiple channels: publications and conferences for researchers and care providers, an executive summary for clinical leaders and policy-makers, and social media for the public.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10347507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103475072023-07-15 Primary care family physicians’ experiences with clinical integration in qualitative and mixed reviews: a systematic review protocol Tseng, L Olivia Newton, Christie Hall, David Lee, Esther J Chang, Howard Poureslami, Iraj Vasarhelyi, Krisztina Lacaille, Diane Mitton, Craig BMJ Open General practice / Family practice INTRODUCTION: Clinical (service) integration in primary care settings describes how comprehensive care is coordinated by family physicians (FPs) over time across healthcare contexts to meet patient care needs. To improve care integration and healthcare service planning, a systematic approach to understanding its numerous influencing factors is paramount. The objective of this study is to generate a comprehensive map of FP-perceived factors influencing clinical integration across diseases and patient demographics. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We developed the protocol with the guidance of the Joanna Briggs Institute systematic review methodology framework. An information specialist built search strategies for MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases using keywords and MeSH terms iteratively collected from a multidisciplinary team. Two reviewers will work independently throughout the study process, from article selection to data analysis. The identified records will be screened by title and abstract and reviewed in the full text against the criteria: FP in primary care (population), clinical integration (concept) and qualitative and mixed reviews published in 2011–2021 (context). We will first describe the characteristics of the review studies. Then, we will extract qualitative, FP-perceived factors and group them by content similarities, such as patient factors. Lastly, we will describe the types of extracted factors using a custom framework. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for a systematic review. The identified factors will help generate an item bank for a survey that will be developed in the Phase II study to ascertain high-impact factors for intervention(s), as well as evidence gaps to guide future research. We will share the study findings with various knowledge users to promote awareness of clinical integration issues through multiple channels: publications and conferences for researchers and care providers, an executive summary for clinical leaders and policy-makers, and social media for the public. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10347507/ /pubmed/37433736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067576 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Tseng, L Olivia
Newton, Christie
Hall, David
Lee, Esther J
Chang, Howard
Poureslami, Iraj
Vasarhelyi, Krisztina
Lacaille, Diane
Mitton, Craig
Primary care family physicians’ experiences with clinical integration in qualitative and mixed reviews: a systematic review protocol
title Primary care family physicians’ experiences with clinical integration in qualitative and mixed reviews: a systematic review protocol
title_full Primary care family physicians’ experiences with clinical integration in qualitative and mixed reviews: a systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Primary care family physicians’ experiences with clinical integration in qualitative and mixed reviews: a systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Primary care family physicians’ experiences with clinical integration in qualitative and mixed reviews: a systematic review protocol
title_short Primary care family physicians’ experiences with clinical integration in qualitative and mixed reviews: a systematic review protocol
title_sort primary care family physicians’ experiences with clinical integration in qualitative and mixed reviews: a systematic review protocol
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10347507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37433736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067576
work_keys_str_mv AT tsenglolivia primarycarefamilyphysiciansexperienceswithclinicalintegrationinqualitativeandmixedreviewsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT newtonchristie primarycarefamilyphysiciansexperienceswithclinicalintegrationinqualitativeandmixedreviewsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT halldavid primarycarefamilyphysiciansexperienceswithclinicalintegrationinqualitativeandmixedreviewsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT leeestherj primarycarefamilyphysiciansexperienceswithclinicalintegrationinqualitativeandmixedreviewsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT changhoward primarycarefamilyphysiciansexperienceswithclinicalintegrationinqualitativeandmixedreviewsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT poureslamiiraj primarycarefamilyphysiciansexperienceswithclinicalintegrationinqualitativeandmixedreviewsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT vasarhelyikrisztina primarycarefamilyphysiciansexperienceswithclinicalintegrationinqualitativeandmixedreviewsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT lacaillediane primarycarefamilyphysiciansexperienceswithclinicalintegrationinqualitativeandmixedreviewsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT mittoncraig primarycarefamilyphysiciansexperienceswithclinicalintegrationinqualitativeandmixedreviewsasystematicreviewprotocol