Cargando…
Primary care family physicians’ experiences with clinical integration in qualitative and mixed reviews: a systematic review protocol
INTRODUCTION: Clinical (service) integration in primary care settings describes how comprehensive care is coordinated by family physicians (FPs) over time across healthcare contexts to meet patient care needs. To improve care integration and healthcare service planning, a systematic approach to unde...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10347507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37433736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067576 |
_version_ | 1785073562524057600 |
---|---|
author | Tseng, L Olivia Newton, Christie Hall, David Lee, Esther J Chang, Howard Poureslami, Iraj Vasarhelyi, Krisztina Lacaille, Diane Mitton, Craig |
author_facet | Tseng, L Olivia Newton, Christie Hall, David Lee, Esther J Chang, Howard Poureslami, Iraj Vasarhelyi, Krisztina Lacaille, Diane Mitton, Craig |
author_sort | Tseng, L Olivia |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Clinical (service) integration in primary care settings describes how comprehensive care is coordinated by family physicians (FPs) over time across healthcare contexts to meet patient care needs. To improve care integration and healthcare service planning, a systematic approach to understanding its numerous influencing factors is paramount. The objective of this study is to generate a comprehensive map of FP-perceived factors influencing clinical integration across diseases and patient demographics. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We developed the protocol with the guidance of the Joanna Briggs Institute systematic review methodology framework. An information specialist built search strategies for MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases using keywords and MeSH terms iteratively collected from a multidisciplinary team. Two reviewers will work independently throughout the study process, from article selection to data analysis. The identified records will be screened by title and abstract and reviewed in the full text against the criteria: FP in primary care (population), clinical integration (concept) and qualitative and mixed reviews published in 2011–2021 (context). We will first describe the characteristics of the review studies. Then, we will extract qualitative, FP-perceived factors and group them by content similarities, such as patient factors. Lastly, we will describe the types of extracted factors using a custom framework. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for a systematic review. The identified factors will help generate an item bank for a survey that will be developed in the Phase II study to ascertain high-impact factors for intervention(s), as well as evidence gaps to guide future research. We will share the study findings with various knowledge users to promote awareness of clinical integration issues through multiple channels: publications and conferences for researchers and care providers, an executive summary for clinical leaders and policy-makers, and social media for the public. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10347507 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103475072023-07-15 Primary care family physicians’ experiences with clinical integration in qualitative and mixed reviews: a systematic review protocol Tseng, L Olivia Newton, Christie Hall, David Lee, Esther J Chang, Howard Poureslami, Iraj Vasarhelyi, Krisztina Lacaille, Diane Mitton, Craig BMJ Open General practice / Family practice INTRODUCTION: Clinical (service) integration in primary care settings describes how comprehensive care is coordinated by family physicians (FPs) over time across healthcare contexts to meet patient care needs. To improve care integration and healthcare service planning, a systematic approach to understanding its numerous influencing factors is paramount. The objective of this study is to generate a comprehensive map of FP-perceived factors influencing clinical integration across diseases and patient demographics. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We developed the protocol with the guidance of the Joanna Briggs Institute systematic review methodology framework. An information specialist built search strategies for MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases using keywords and MeSH terms iteratively collected from a multidisciplinary team. Two reviewers will work independently throughout the study process, from article selection to data analysis. The identified records will be screened by title and abstract and reviewed in the full text against the criteria: FP in primary care (population), clinical integration (concept) and qualitative and mixed reviews published in 2011–2021 (context). We will first describe the characteristics of the review studies. Then, we will extract qualitative, FP-perceived factors and group them by content similarities, such as patient factors. Lastly, we will describe the types of extracted factors using a custom framework. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for a systematic review. The identified factors will help generate an item bank for a survey that will be developed in the Phase II study to ascertain high-impact factors for intervention(s), as well as evidence gaps to guide future research. We will share the study findings with various knowledge users to promote awareness of clinical integration issues through multiple channels: publications and conferences for researchers and care providers, an executive summary for clinical leaders and policy-makers, and social media for the public. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10347507/ /pubmed/37433736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067576 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Tseng, L Olivia Newton, Christie Hall, David Lee, Esther J Chang, Howard Poureslami, Iraj Vasarhelyi, Krisztina Lacaille, Diane Mitton, Craig Primary care family physicians’ experiences with clinical integration in qualitative and mixed reviews: a systematic review protocol |
title | Primary care family physicians’ experiences with clinical integration in qualitative and mixed reviews: a systematic review protocol |
title_full | Primary care family physicians’ experiences with clinical integration in qualitative and mixed reviews: a systematic review protocol |
title_fullStr | Primary care family physicians’ experiences with clinical integration in qualitative and mixed reviews: a systematic review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Primary care family physicians’ experiences with clinical integration in qualitative and mixed reviews: a systematic review protocol |
title_short | Primary care family physicians’ experiences with clinical integration in qualitative and mixed reviews: a systematic review protocol |
title_sort | primary care family physicians’ experiences with clinical integration in qualitative and mixed reviews: a systematic review protocol |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10347507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37433736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067576 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsenglolivia primarycarefamilyphysiciansexperienceswithclinicalintegrationinqualitativeandmixedreviewsasystematicreviewprotocol AT newtonchristie primarycarefamilyphysiciansexperienceswithclinicalintegrationinqualitativeandmixedreviewsasystematicreviewprotocol AT halldavid primarycarefamilyphysiciansexperienceswithclinicalintegrationinqualitativeandmixedreviewsasystematicreviewprotocol AT leeestherj primarycarefamilyphysiciansexperienceswithclinicalintegrationinqualitativeandmixedreviewsasystematicreviewprotocol AT changhoward primarycarefamilyphysiciansexperienceswithclinicalintegrationinqualitativeandmixedreviewsasystematicreviewprotocol AT poureslamiiraj primarycarefamilyphysiciansexperienceswithclinicalintegrationinqualitativeandmixedreviewsasystematicreviewprotocol AT vasarhelyikrisztina primarycarefamilyphysiciansexperienceswithclinicalintegrationinqualitativeandmixedreviewsasystematicreviewprotocol AT lacaillediane primarycarefamilyphysiciansexperienceswithclinicalintegrationinqualitativeandmixedreviewsasystematicreviewprotocol AT mittoncraig primarycarefamilyphysiciansexperienceswithclinicalintegrationinqualitativeandmixedreviewsasystematicreviewprotocol |