Cargando…

Global use of electronic patient-reported outcome systems in nephrology: a mixed methods study

OBJECTIVES: The use of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems to support the management of patients with chronic kidney disease is increasing. This mixed-methods study aimed to comprehensively identify existing and developing ePRO systems, used in nephrology settings globally, ascertaini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anderson, Nicola Elizabeth, Kyte, Derek, McMullan, Christel, Cockwell, Paul, Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee, Verdi, Rav, Calvert, Melanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10347510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37438075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070927
_version_ 1785073562996965376
author Anderson, Nicola Elizabeth
Kyte, Derek
McMullan, Christel
Cockwell, Paul
Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
Verdi, Rav
Calvert, Melanie
author_facet Anderson, Nicola Elizabeth
Kyte, Derek
McMullan, Christel
Cockwell, Paul
Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
Verdi, Rav
Calvert, Melanie
author_sort Anderson, Nicola Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The use of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems to support the management of patients with chronic kidney disease is increasing. This mixed-methods study aimed to comprehensively identify existing and developing ePRO systems, used in nephrology settings globally, ascertaining key characteristics and factors for successful implementation. STUDY DESIGN: ePRO systems and developers were identified through a scoping review of the literature and contact with field experts. Developers were invited to participate in a structured survey, to summarise key system characteristics including: (1) system objectives, (2) population, (3) PRO measures used, (4) level of automation, (5) reporting, (6) integration into workflow and (7) links to electronic health records/national registries. Subsequent semistructured interviews were conducted to explore responses. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Eligible systems included those being developed or used in nephrology settings to assess ePROs and summarise results to care providers. System developers included those with a key responsibility for aspects of the design, development or implementation of an eligible system. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Structured survey data were summarised using descriptive statistics. Interview transcripts were analysed using Codebook Thematic Analysis using domains from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. RESULTS: Fifteen unique ePRO systems were identified across seven countries; 10 system developers completed the structured survey and 7 participated in semistructured interviews. Despite system heterogeneity, reported features required for effective implementation included early and sustained patient involvement, clinician champions and expanding existing electronic platforms to integrate ePROs. Systems demonstrated several common features, with the majority being implemented within research settings, thereby affecting system implementation readiness for real-world application. CONCLUSIONS: There has been considerable research investment in ePRO systems. The findings of this study outline key system features and factors to support the successful implementation of ePROs in routine kidney care.Cite Now
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10347510
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103475102023-07-15 Global use of electronic patient-reported outcome systems in nephrology: a mixed methods study Anderson, Nicola Elizabeth Kyte, Derek McMullan, Christel Cockwell, Paul Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee Verdi, Rav Calvert, Melanie BMJ Open Renal Medicine OBJECTIVES: The use of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems to support the management of patients with chronic kidney disease is increasing. This mixed-methods study aimed to comprehensively identify existing and developing ePRO systems, used in nephrology settings globally, ascertaining key characteristics and factors for successful implementation. STUDY DESIGN: ePRO systems and developers were identified through a scoping review of the literature and contact with field experts. Developers were invited to participate in a structured survey, to summarise key system characteristics including: (1) system objectives, (2) population, (3) PRO measures used, (4) level of automation, (5) reporting, (6) integration into workflow and (7) links to electronic health records/national registries. Subsequent semistructured interviews were conducted to explore responses. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Eligible systems included those being developed or used in nephrology settings to assess ePROs and summarise results to care providers. System developers included those with a key responsibility for aspects of the design, development or implementation of an eligible system. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Structured survey data were summarised using descriptive statistics. Interview transcripts were analysed using Codebook Thematic Analysis using domains from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. RESULTS: Fifteen unique ePRO systems were identified across seven countries; 10 system developers completed the structured survey and 7 participated in semistructured interviews. Despite system heterogeneity, reported features required for effective implementation included early and sustained patient involvement, clinician champions and expanding existing electronic platforms to integrate ePROs. Systems demonstrated several common features, with the majority being implemented within research settings, thereby affecting system implementation readiness for real-world application. CONCLUSIONS: There has been considerable research investment in ePRO systems. The findings of this study outline key system features and factors to support the successful implementation of ePROs in routine kidney care.Cite Now BMJ Publishing Group 2023-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10347510/ /pubmed/37438075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070927 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Renal Medicine
Anderson, Nicola Elizabeth
Kyte, Derek
McMullan, Christel
Cockwell, Paul
Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
Verdi, Rav
Calvert, Melanie
Global use of electronic patient-reported outcome systems in nephrology: a mixed methods study
title Global use of electronic patient-reported outcome systems in nephrology: a mixed methods study
title_full Global use of electronic patient-reported outcome systems in nephrology: a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Global use of electronic patient-reported outcome systems in nephrology: a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Global use of electronic patient-reported outcome systems in nephrology: a mixed methods study
title_short Global use of electronic patient-reported outcome systems in nephrology: a mixed methods study
title_sort global use of electronic patient-reported outcome systems in nephrology: a mixed methods study
topic Renal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10347510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37438075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070927
work_keys_str_mv AT andersonnicolaelizabeth globaluseofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesystemsinnephrologyamixedmethodsstudy
AT kytederek globaluseofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesystemsinnephrologyamixedmethodsstudy
AT mcmullanchristel globaluseofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesystemsinnephrologyamixedmethodsstudy
AT cockwellpaul globaluseofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesystemsinnephrologyamixedmethodsstudy
AT aiyegbusiolalekanlee globaluseofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesystemsinnephrologyamixedmethodsstudy
AT verdirav globaluseofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesystemsinnephrologyamixedmethodsstudy
AT calvertmelanie globaluseofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesystemsinnephrologyamixedmethodsstudy