Cargando…

Determining the clinical and cost-effectiveness of nasal sprays and a physical activity and stress management intervention to reduce respiratory tract infections in primary care: A protocol for the ‘Immune Defence’ randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Most adults in the UK experience at least one viral respiratory tract infection (RTI) per year. Individuals with comorbidities and those with recurrent RTIs are at higher risk of infections. This can lead to more severe illness, worse quality of life and more days off work. There is prom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vennik, Jane, Geraghty, Adam W. A., Martinson, Kate, Yardley, Lucy, Stuart, Beth, Moore, Michael, Francis, Nick, Hay, Alastair, Verheij, Theo, Bradbury, Katherine, Greenwell, Kate, Dennison, Laura, Williamson, Sian, Denison-Day, James, Ainsworth, Ben, Raftery, James, Zhu, Shihua, Butler, Christopher, Richards-Hall, Samantha, Little, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10348543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37450460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285693
_version_ 1785073688466423808
author Vennik, Jane
Geraghty, Adam W. A.
Martinson, Kate
Yardley, Lucy
Stuart, Beth
Moore, Michael
Francis, Nick
Hay, Alastair
Verheij, Theo
Bradbury, Katherine
Greenwell, Kate
Dennison, Laura
Williamson, Sian
Denison-Day, James
Ainsworth, Ben
Raftery, James
Zhu, Shihua
Butler, Christopher
Richards-Hall, Samantha
Little, Paul
author_facet Vennik, Jane
Geraghty, Adam W. A.
Martinson, Kate
Yardley, Lucy
Stuart, Beth
Moore, Michael
Francis, Nick
Hay, Alastair
Verheij, Theo
Bradbury, Katherine
Greenwell, Kate
Dennison, Laura
Williamson, Sian
Denison-Day, James
Ainsworth, Ben
Raftery, James
Zhu, Shihua
Butler, Christopher
Richards-Hall, Samantha
Little, Paul
author_sort Vennik, Jane
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most adults in the UK experience at least one viral respiratory tract infection (RTI) per year. Individuals with comorbidities and those with recurrent RTIs are at higher risk of infections. This can lead to more severe illness, worse quality of life and more days off work. There is promising evidence that using common nasal sprays or improving immune function through increasing physical activity and managing stress, may reduce the incidence and severity of RTIs. METHODS AND DESIGN: Immune Defence is an open, parallel group, randomised controlled trial. Up to 15000 adults from UK general practices, with a comorbidity or risk factor for infection and/or recurrent infections (3 or more infections per year) will be randomly allocated to i) a gel-based nasal spray designed to inhibit viral respiratory infections; ii) a saline nasal spray, iii) a digital intervention promoting physical activity and stress management, or iv) usual care with brief advice for managing infections, for 12 months. Participants will complete monthly questionnaires online. The primary outcome is the total number of days of illness due to RTIs over 6 months. Key secondary outcomes include: days with symptoms moderately bad or worse; days where work/normal activities were impaired; incidence of RTI; incidence of COVID-19; health service contacts; antibiotic usage; beliefs about antibiotics; intention to consult; number of days of illness in total due to respiratory tract infections over 12 months. Economic evaluation from an NHS perspective will compare the interventions, expressed as incremental cost effectiveness ratios. A nested mixed methods process evaluation will examine uptake and engagement with the interventions and trial procedures. TRIAL STATUS: Recruitment commenced in December 2020 and the last participant is expected to complete the trial in April 2024. DISCUSSION: Common nasal sprays and digital interventions to promote physical activity and stress management are low cost, accessible interventions applicable to primary care. If effective, they have the potential to reduce the individual and societal impact of RTIs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospectively registered with ISRCTN registry (17936080) on 30/10/2020. SPONSOR: This RCT is sponsored by University of Southampton. The sponsors had no role in the study design, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10348543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103485432023-07-15 Determining the clinical and cost-effectiveness of nasal sprays and a physical activity and stress management intervention to reduce respiratory tract infections in primary care: A protocol for the ‘Immune Defence’ randomised controlled trial Vennik, Jane Geraghty, Adam W. A. Martinson, Kate Yardley, Lucy Stuart, Beth Moore, Michael Francis, Nick Hay, Alastair Verheij, Theo Bradbury, Katherine Greenwell, Kate Dennison, Laura Williamson, Sian Denison-Day, James Ainsworth, Ben Raftery, James Zhu, Shihua Butler, Christopher Richards-Hall, Samantha Little, Paul PLoS One Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Most adults in the UK experience at least one viral respiratory tract infection (RTI) per year. Individuals with comorbidities and those with recurrent RTIs are at higher risk of infections. This can lead to more severe illness, worse quality of life and more days off work. There is promising evidence that using common nasal sprays or improving immune function through increasing physical activity and managing stress, may reduce the incidence and severity of RTIs. METHODS AND DESIGN: Immune Defence is an open, parallel group, randomised controlled trial. Up to 15000 adults from UK general practices, with a comorbidity or risk factor for infection and/or recurrent infections (3 or more infections per year) will be randomly allocated to i) a gel-based nasal spray designed to inhibit viral respiratory infections; ii) a saline nasal spray, iii) a digital intervention promoting physical activity and stress management, or iv) usual care with brief advice for managing infections, for 12 months. Participants will complete monthly questionnaires online. The primary outcome is the total number of days of illness due to RTIs over 6 months. Key secondary outcomes include: days with symptoms moderately bad or worse; days where work/normal activities were impaired; incidence of RTI; incidence of COVID-19; health service contacts; antibiotic usage; beliefs about antibiotics; intention to consult; number of days of illness in total due to respiratory tract infections over 12 months. Economic evaluation from an NHS perspective will compare the interventions, expressed as incremental cost effectiveness ratios. A nested mixed methods process evaluation will examine uptake and engagement with the interventions and trial procedures. TRIAL STATUS: Recruitment commenced in December 2020 and the last participant is expected to complete the trial in April 2024. DISCUSSION: Common nasal sprays and digital interventions to promote physical activity and stress management are low cost, accessible interventions applicable to primary care. If effective, they have the potential to reduce the individual and societal impact of RTIs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospectively registered with ISRCTN registry (17936080) on 30/10/2020. SPONSOR: This RCT is sponsored by University of Southampton. The sponsors had no role in the study design, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Public Library of Science 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10348543/ /pubmed/37450460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285693 Text en © 2023 Vennik et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Vennik, Jane
Geraghty, Adam W. A.
Martinson, Kate
Yardley, Lucy
Stuart, Beth
Moore, Michael
Francis, Nick
Hay, Alastair
Verheij, Theo
Bradbury, Katherine
Greenwell, Kate
Dennison, Laura
Williamson, Sian
Denison-Day, James
Ainsworth, Ben
Raftery, James
Zhu, Shihua
Butler, Christopher
Richards-Hall, Samantha
Little, Paul
Determining the clinical and cost-effectiveness of nasal sprays and a physical activity and stress management intervention to reduce respiratory tract infections in primary care: A protocol for the ‘Immune Defence’ randomised controlled trial
title Determining the clinical and cost-effectiveness of nasal sprays and a physical activity and stress management intervention to reduce respiratory tract infections in primary care: A protocol for the ‘Immune Defence’ randomised controlled trial
title_full Determining the clinical and cost-effectiveness of nasal sprays and a physical activity and stress management intervention to reduce respiratory tract infections in primary care: A protocol for the ‘Immune Defence’ randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Determining the clinical and cost-effectiveness of nasal sprays and a physical activity and stress management intervention to reduce respiratory tract infections in primary care: A protocol for the ‘Immune Defence’ randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Determining the clinical and cost-effectiveness of nasal sprays and a physical activity and stress management intervention to reduce respiratory tract infections in primary care: A protocol for the ‘Immune Defence’ randomised controlled trial
title_short Determining the clinical and cost-effectiveness of nasal sprays and a physical activity and stress management intervention to reduce respiratory tract infections in primary care: A protocol for the ‘Immune Defence’ randomised controlled trial
title_sort determining the clinical and cost-effectiveness of nasal sprays and a physical activity and stress management intervention to reduce respiratory tract infections in primary care: a protocol for the ‘immune defence’ randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10348543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37450460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285693
work_keys_str_mv AT vennikjane determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT geraghtyadamwa determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT martinsonkate determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT yardleylucy determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT stuartbeth determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mooremichael determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT francisnick determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hayalastair determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT verheijtheo determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bradburykatherine determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT greenwellkate determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dennisonlaura determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT williamsonsian determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT denisondayjames determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ainsworthben determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rafteryjames determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zhushihua determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT butlerchristopher determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT richardshallsamantha determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT littlepaul determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial