Cargando…
Determining the clinical and cost-effectiveness of nasal sprays and a physical activity and stress management intervention to reduce respiratory tract infections in primary care: A protocol for the ‘Immune Defence’ randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Most adults in the UK experience at least one viral respiratory tract infection (RTI) per year. Individuals with comorbidities and those with recurrent RTIs are at higher risk of infections. This can lead to more severe illness, worse quality of life and more days off work. There is prom...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10348543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37450460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285693 |
_version_ | 1785073688466423808 |
---|---|
author | Vennik, Jane Geraghty, Adam W. A. Martinson, Kate Yardley, Lucy Stuart, Beth Moore, Michael Francis, Nick Hay, Alastair Verheij, Theo Bradbury, Katherine Greenwell, Kate Dennison, Laura Williamson, Sian Denison-Day, James Ainsworth, Ben Raftery, James Zhu, Shihua Butler, Christopher Richards-Hall, Samantha Little, Paul |
author_facet | Vennik, Jane Geraghty, Adam W. A. Martinson, Kate Yardley, Lucy Stuart, Beth Moore, Michael Francis, Nick Hay, Alastair Verheij, Theo Bradbury, Katherine Greenwell, Kate Dennison, Laura Williamson, Sian Denison-Day, James Ainsworth, Ben Raftery, James Zhu, Shihua Butler, Christopher Richards-Hall, Samantha Little, Paul |
author_sort | Vennik, Jane |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Most adults in the UK experience at least one viral respiratory tract infection (RTI) per year. Individuals with comorbidities and those with recurrent RTIs are at higher risk of infections. This can lead to more severe illness, worse quality of life and more days off work. There is promising evidence that using common nasal sprays or improving immune function through increasing physical activity and managing stress, may reduce the incidence and severity of RTIs. METHODS AND DESIGN: Immune Defence is an open, parallel group, randomised controlled trial. Up to 15000 adults from UK general practices, with a comorbidity or risk factor for infection and/or recurrent infections (3 or more infections per year) will be randomly allocated to i) a gel-based nasal spray designed to inhibit viral respiratory infections; ii) a saline nasal spray, iii) a digital intervention promoting physical activity and stress management, or iv) usual care with brief advice for managing infections, for 12 months. Participants will complete monthly questionnaires online. The primary outcome is the total number of days of illness due to RTIs over 6 months. Key secondary outcomes include: days with symptoms moderately bad or worse; days where work/normal activities were impaired; incidence of RTI; incidence of COVID-19; health service contacts; antibiotic usage; beliefs about antibiotics; intention to consult; number of days of illness in total due to respiratory tract infections over 12 months. Economic evaluation from an NHS perspective will compare the interventions, expressed as incremental cost effectiveness ratios. A nested mixed methods process evaluation will examine uptake and engagement with the interventions and trial procedures. TRIAL STATUS: Recruitment commenced in December 2020 and the last participant is expected to complete the trial in April 2024. DISCUSSION: Common nasal sprays and digital interventions to promote physical activity and stress management are low cost, accessible interventions applicable to primary care. If effective, they have the potential to reduce the individual and societal impact of RTIs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospectively registered with ISRCTN registry (17936080) on 30/10/2020. SPONSOR: This RCT is sponsored by University of Southampton. The sponsors had no role in the study design, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10348543 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103485432023-07-15 Determining the clinical and cost-effectiveness of nasal sprays and a physical activity and stress management intervention to reduce respiratory tract infections in primary care: A protocol for the ‘Immune Defence’ randomised controlled trial Vennik, Jane Geraghty, Adam W. A. Martinson, Kate Yardley, Lucy Stuart, Beth Moore, Michael Francis, Nick Hay, Alastair Verheij, Theo Bradbury, Katherine Greenwell, Kate Dennison, Laura Williamson, Sian Denison-Day, James Ainsworth, Ben Raftery, James Zhu, Shihua Butler, Christopher Richards-Hall, Samantha Little, Paul PLoS One Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Most adults in the UK experience at least one viral respiratory tract infection (RTI) per year. Individuals with comorbidities and those with recurrent RTIs are at higher risk of infections. This can lead to more severe illness, worse quality of life and more days off work. There is promising evidence that using common nasal sprays or improving immune function through increasing physical activity and managing stress, may reduce the incidence and severity of RTIs. METHODS AND DESIGN: Immune Defence is an open, parallel group, randomised controlled trial. Up to 15000 adults from UK general practices, with a comorbidity or risk factor for infection and/or recurrent infections (3 or more infections per year) will be randomly allocated to i) a gel-based nasal spray designed to inhibit viral respiratory infections; ii) a saline nasal spray, iii) a digital intervention promoting physical activity and stress management, or iv) usual care with brief advice for managing infections, for 12 months. Participants will complete monthly questionnaires online. The primary outcome is the total number of days of illness due to RTIs over 6 months. Key secondary outcomes include: days with symptoms moderately bad or worse; days where work/normal activities were impaired; incidence of RTI; incidence of COVID-19; health service contacts; antibiotic usage; beliefs about antibiotics; intention to consult; number of days of illness in total due to respiratory tract infections over 12 months. Economic evaluation from an NHS perspective will compare the interventions, expressed as incremental cost effectiveness ratios. A nested mixed methods process evaluation will examine uptake and engagement with the interventions and trial procedures. TRIAL STATUS: Recruitment commenced in December 2020 and the last participant is expected to complete the trial in April 2024. DISCUSSION: Common nasal sprays and digital interventions to promote physical activity and stress management are low cost, accessible interventions applicable to primary care. If effective, they have the potential to reduce the individual and societal impact of RTIs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospectively registered with ISRCTN registry (17936080) on 30/10/2020. SPONSOR: This RCT is sponsored by University of Southampton. The sponsors had no role in the study design, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Public Library of Science 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10348543/ /pubmed/37450460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285693 Text en © 2023 Vennik et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Vennik, Jane Geraghty, Adam W. A. Martinson, Kate Yardley, Lucy Stuart, Beth Moore, Michael Francis, Nick Hay, Alastair Verheij, Theo Bradbury, Katherine Greenwell, Kate Dennison, Laura Williamson, Sian Denison-Day, James Ainsworth, Ben Raftery, James Zhu, Shihua Butler, Christopher Richards-Hall, Samantha Little, Paul Determining the clinical and cost-effectiveness of nasal sprays and a physical activity and stress management intervention to reduce respiratory tract infections in primary care: A protocol for the ‘Immune Defence’ randomised controlled trial |
title | Determining the clinical and cost-effectiveness of nasal sprays and a physical activity and stress management intervention to reduce respiratory tract infections in primary care: A protocol for the ‘Immune Defence’ randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Determining the clinical and cost-effectiveness of nasal sprays and a physical activity and stress management intervention to reduce respiratory tract infections in primary care: A protocol for the ‘Immune Defence’ randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Determining the clinical and cost-effectiveness of nasal sprays and a physical activity and stress management intervention to reduce respiratory tract infections in primary care: A protocol for the ‘Immune Defence’ randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Determining the clinical and cost-effectiveness of nasal sprays and a physical activity and stress management intervention to reduce respiratory tract infections in primary care: A protocol for the ‘Immune Defence’ randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Determining the clinical and cost-effectiveness of nasal sprays and a physical activity and stress management intervention to reduce respiratory tract infections in primary care: A protocol for the ‘Immune Defence’ randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | determining the clinical and cost-effectiveness of nasal sprays and a physical activity and stress management intervention to reduce respiratory tract infections in primary care: a protocol for the ‘immune defence’ randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10348543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37450460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285693 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vennikjane determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT geraghtyadamwa determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT martinsonkate determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT yardleylucy determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT stuartbeth determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mooremichael determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT francisnick determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hayalastair determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT verheijtheo determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bradburykatherine determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT greenwellkate determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT dennisonlaura determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT williamsonsian determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT denisondayjames determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ainsworthben determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT rafteryjames determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT zhushihua determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT butlerchristopher determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT richardshallsamantha determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT littlepaul determiningtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofnasalspraysandaphysicalactivityandstressmanagementinterventiontoreducerespiratorytractinfectionsinprimarycareaprotocolfortheimmunedefencerandomisedcontrolledtrial |