Cargando…

Spatial variability of the Po River food web and its comparison with the Danube River food web

Freshwater ecosystems are experiencing unprecedented pressure globally. To address environmental challenges, systematic and comparative studies on ecosystems are needed, though mostly lacking, especially for rivers. Here, we describe the food web of the Po River (as integrated from the white literat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patonai, Katalin, Jordán, Ferenc, Castaldelli, Giuseppe, Congiu, Leonardo, Gavioli, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10348563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37450464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288652
_version_ 1785073693300359168
author Patonai, Katalin
Jordán, Ferenc
Castaldelli, Giuseppe
Congiu, Leonardo
Gavioli, Anna
author_facet Patonai, Katalin
Jordán, Ferenc
Castaldelli, Giuseppe
Congiu, Leonardo
Gavioli, Anna
author_sort Patonai, Katalin
collection PubMed
description Freshwater ecosystems are experiencing unprecedented pressure globally. To address environmental challenges, systematic and comparative studies on ecosystems are needed, though mostly lacking, especially for rivers. Here, we describe the food web of the Po River (as integrated from the white literature and monitoring data), describe the three river sections using network analysis, and compare our results with the previously compiled Danube River food web. The Po River food web was taxonomically aggregated in five consecutive steps (T1-T5) and it was also analyzed using the regular equivalence (REGE) algorithm to identify structurally similar nodes in the most aggregated T5 model. In total, the two river food webs shared 30 nodes. Two network metrics (normalized degree centrality [nDC]) and normalized betweenness centrality [nBC]) were compared using Mann-Whitney tests in the two rivers. On average, the Po River nodes have larger nDC values than in the Danube, meaning that neighboring connections are better mapped. Regarding nBC, there were no significant differences between the two rivers. Finally, based on both centrality indices, Carassius auratus is the most important node in the Po River food web, whereas phytoplankton and detritus are most important in the Danube River. Using network analysis and comparative methods, it is possible to draw attention to important trophic groups and knowledge gaps, which can guide future research. These simple models for the Po River food web can pave the way for more advanced models, supporting quantitative and predictive—as well as more functional—descriptions of ecosystems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10348563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103485632023-07-15 Spatial variability of the Po River food web and its comparison with the Danube River food web Patonai, Katalin Jordán, Ferenc Castaldelli, Giuseppe Congiu, Leonardo Gavioli, Anna PLoS One Research Article Freshwater ecosystems are experiencing unprecedented pressure globally. To address environmental challenges, systematic and comparative studies on ecosystems are needed, though mostly lacking, especially for rivers. Here, we describe the food web of the Po River (as integrated from the white literature and monitoring data), describe the three river sections using network analysis, and compare our results with the previously compiled Danube River food web. The Po River food web was taxonomically aggregated in five consecutive steps (T1-T5) and it was also analyzed using the regular equivalence (REGE) algorithm to identify structurally similar nodes in the most aggregated T5 model. In total, the two river food webs shared 30 nodes. Two network metrics (normalized degree centrality [nDC]) and normalized betweenness centrality [nBC]) were compared using Mann-Whitney tests in the two rivers. On average, the Po River nodes have larger nDC values than in the Danube, meaning that neighboring connections are better mapped. Regarding nBC, there were no significant differences between the two rivers. Finally, based on both centrality indices, Carassius auratus is the most important node in the Po River food web, whereas phytoplankton and detritus are most important in the Danube River. Using network analysis and comparative methods, it is possible to draw attention to important trophic groups and knowledge gaps, which can guide future research. These simple models for the Po River food web can pave the way for more advanced models, supporting quantitative and predictive—as well as more functional—descriptions of ecosystems. Public Library of Science 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10348563/ /pubmed/37450464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288652 Text en © 2023 Patonai et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Patonai, Katalin
Jordán, Ferenc
Castaldelli, Giuseppe
Congiu, Leonardo
Gavioli, Anna
Spatial variability of the Po River food web and its comparison with the Danube River food web
title Spatial variability of the Po River food web and its comparison with the Danube River food web
title_full Spatial variability of the Po River food web and its comparison with the Danube River food web
title_fullStr Spatial variability of the Po River food web and its comparison with the Danube River food web
title_full_unstemmed Spatial variability of the Po River food web and its comparison with the Danube River food web
title_short Spatial variability of the Po River food web and its comparison with the Danube River food web
title_sort spatial variability of the po river food web and its comparison with the danube river food web
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10348563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37450464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288652
work_keys_str_mv AT patonaikatalin spatialvariabilityoftheporiverfoodwebanditscomparisonwiththedanuberiverfoodweb
AT jordanferenc spatialvariabilityoftheporiverfoodwebanditscomparisonwiththedanuberiverfoodweb
AT castaldelligiuseppe spatialvariabilityoftheporiverfoodwebanditscomparisonwiththedanuberiverfoodweb
AT congiuleonardo spatialvariabilityoftheporiverfoodwebanditscomparisonwiththedanuberiverfoodweb
AT gaviolianna spatialvariabilityoftheporiverfoodwebanditscomparisonwiththedanuberiverfoodweb