Cargando…
Spatial variability of the Po River food web and its comparison with the Danube River food web
Freshwater ecosystems are experiencing unprecedented pressure globally. To address environmental challenges, systematic and comparative studies on ecosystems are needed, though mostly lacking, especially for rivers. Here, we describe the food web of the Po River (as integrated from the white literat...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10348563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37450464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288652 |
_version_ | 1785073693300359168 |
---|---|
author | Patonai, Katalin Jordán, Ferenc Castaldelli, Giuseppe Congiu, Leonardo Gavioli, Anna |
author_facet | Patonai, Katalin Jordán, Ferenc Castaldelli, Giuseppe Congiu, Leonardo Gavioli, Anna |
author_sort | Patonai, Katalin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Freshwater ecosystems are experiencing unprecedented pressure globally. To address environmental challenges, systematic and comparative studies on ecosystems are needed, though mostly lacking, especially for rivers. Here, we describe the food web of the Po River (as integrated from the white literature and monitoring data), describe the three river sections using network analysis, and compare our results with the previously compiled Danube River food web. The Po River food web was taxonomically aggregated in five consecutive steps (T1-T5) and it was also analyzed using the regular equivalence (REGE) algorithm to identify structurally similar nodes in the most aggregated T5 model. In total, the two river food webs shared 30 nodes. Two network metrics (normalized degree centrality [nDC]) and normalized betweenness centrality [nBC]) were compared using Mann-Whitney tests in the two rivers. On average, the Po River nodes have larger nDC values than in the Danube, meaning that neighboring connections are better mapped. Regarding nBC, there were no significant differences between the two rivers. Finally, based on both centrality indices, Carassius auratus is the most important node in the Po River food web, whereas phytoplankton and detritus are most important in the Danube River. Using network analysis and comparative methods, it is possible to draw attention to important trophic groups and knowledge gaps, which can guide future research. These simple models for the Po River food web can pave the way for more advanced models, supporting quantitative and predictive—as well as more functional—descriptions of ecosystems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10348563 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103485632023-07-15 Spatial variability of the Po River food web and its comparison with the Danube River food web Patonai, Katalin Jordán, Ferenc Castaldelli, Giuseppe Congiu, Leonardo Gavioli, Anna PLoS One Research Article Freshwater ecosystems are experiencing unprecedented pressure globally. To address environmental challenges, systematic and comparative studies on ecosystems are needed, though mostly lacking, especially for rivers. Here, we describe the food web of the Po River (as integrated from the white literature and monitoring data), describe the three river sections using network analysis, and compare our results with the previously compiled Danube River food web. The Po River food web was taxonomically aggregated in five consecutive steps (T1-T5) and it was also analyzed using the regular equivalence (REGE) algorithm to identify structurally similar nodes in the most aggregated T5 model. In total, the two river food webs shared 30 nodes. Two network metrics (normalized degree centrality [nDC]) and normalized betweenness centrality [nBC]) were compared using Mann-Whitney tests in the two rivers. On average, the Po River nodes have larger nDC values than in the Danube, meaning that neighboring connections are better mapped. Regarding nBC, there were no significant differences between the two rivers. Finally, based on both centrality indices, Carassius auratus is the most important node in the Po River food web, whereas phytoplankton and detritus are most important in the Danube River. Using network analysis and comparative methods, it is possible to draw attention to important trophic groups and knowledge gaps, which can guide future research. These simple models for the Po River food web can pave the way for more advanced models, supporting quantitative and predictive—as well as more functional—descriptions of ecosystems. Public Library of Science 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10348563/ /pubmed/37450464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288652 Text en © 2023 Patonai et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Patonai, Katalin Jordán, Ferenc Castaldelli, Giuseppe Congiu, Leonardo Gavioli, Anna Spatial variability of the Po River food web and its comparison with the Danube River food web |
title | Spatial variability of the Po River food web and its comparison with the Danube River food web |
title_full | Spatial variability of the Po River food web and its comparison with the Danube River food web |
title_fullStr | Spatial variability of the Po River food web and its comparison with the Danube River food web |
title_full_unstemmed | Spatial variability of the Po River food web and its comparison with the Danube River food web |
title_short | Spatial variability of the Po River food web and its comparison with the Danube River food web |
title_sort | spatial variability of the po river food web and its comparison with the danube river food web |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10348563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37450464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288652 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patonaikatalin spatialvariabilityoftheporiverfoodwebanditscomparisonwiththedanuberiverfoodweb AT jordanferenc spatialvariabilityoftheporiverfoodwebanditscomparisonwiththedanuberiverfoodweb AT castaldelligiuseppe spatialvariabilityoftheporiverfoodwebanditscomparisonwiththedanuberiverfoodweb AT congiuleonardo spatialvariabilityoftheporiverfoodwebanditscomparisonwiththedanuberiverfoodweb AT gaviolianna spatialvariabilityoftheporiverfoodwebanditscomparisonwiththedanuberiverfoodweb |