Cargando…

Which method is optimal for estimating variance components and their variability in generalizability theory? evidence form a set of unified rules for bootstrap method

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of the four estimation methods (traditional method, jackknife method, bootstrap method, and MCMC method), find the optimal one, and make a set of unified rules for Bootstrap. METHODS: Based on four types of simulated data (normal, di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Li, Guangming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10348584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37450506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288069
_version_ 1785073698098642944
author Li, Guangming
author_facet Li, Guangming
author_sort Li, Guangming
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of the four estimation methods (traditional method, jackknife method, bootstrap method, and MCMC method), find the optimal one, and make a set of unified rules for Bootstrap. METHODS: Based on four types of simulated data (normal, dichotomous, polytomous, and skewed data), this study estimates and compares the estimated variance components and their variability of the four estimation methods when using a p×i design in generalizability theory. The estimated variance components are vc.p, vc.i and vc.pi and the variability of estimated variance components are their estimated standard errors (SE(vc.p), SE(vc.i) and SE(vc.pi)) and confidence intervals (CI(vc.p), CI(vc.i) and CI(vc.pi)). RESULTS: For the normal data, all the four methods can accurately estimate the variance components and their variability. For the dichotomous data, the |RPB| of SE (vc.i) of traditional method is 128.5714, the |RPB| of SE (vc.i), SE (vc.pi) and CI (vc.i) of jackknife method are 42.8571, 43.6893 and 40.5000, which are larger than 25 and not accurate. For the polytomous data, the |RPB| of SE (vc.i) and CI (vc.i) of MCMC method are 59.6612 and 45.2500, which are larger than 25 and not accurate. For the skewed data, the |RPB| of SE (vc.p), SE (vc.i) and SE (vc. pi) of traditional method and MCMC method are over 25, which are not accurate. Only the bootstrap method can estimate variance components and their variability accurately across different data distribution. Nonetheless, the divide-and-conquer strategy must be used when adopting the bootstrap method. CONCLUSIONS: The bootstrap method is optimal among the four methods and shows the cross-distribution superiority over the other three methods. However, a set of unified rules for the divide-and-conquer strategy need to be recommended for the bootstrap method, which is optimal when boot-p for p (person), boot-pi for i (item), and boot-i for pi (person × item).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10348584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103485842023-07-15 Which method is optimal for estimating variance components and their variability in generalizability theory? evidence form a set of unified rules for bootstrap method Li, Guangming PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of the four estimation methods (traditional method, jackknife method, bootstrap method, and MCMC method), find the optimal one, and make a set of unified rules for Bootstrap. METHODS: Based on four types of simulated data (normal, dichotomous, polytomous, and skewed data), this study estimates and compares the estimated variance components and their variability of the four estimation methods when using a p×i design in generalizability theory. The estimated variance components are vc.p, vc.i and vc.pi and the variability of estimated variance components are their estimated standard errors (SE(vc.p), SE(vc.i) and SE(vc.pi)) and confidence intervals (CI(vc.p), CI(vc.i) and CI(vc.pi)). RESULTS: For the normal data, all the four methods can accurately estimate the variance components and their variability. For the dichotomous data, the |RPB| of SE (vc.i) of traditional method is 128.5714, the |RPB| of SE (vc.i), SE (vc.pi) and CI (vc.i) of jackknife method are 42.8571, 43.6893 and 40.5000, which are larger than 25 and not accurate. For the polytomous data, the |RPB| of SE (vc.i) and CI (vc.i) of MCMC method are 59.6612 and 45.2500, which are larger than 25 and not accurate. For the skewed data, the |RPB| of SE (vc.p), SE (vc.i) and SE (vc. pi) of traditional method and MCMC method are over 25, which are not accurate. Only the bootstrap method can estimate variance components and their variability accurately across different data distribution. Nonetheless, the divide-and-conquer strategy must be used when adopting the bootstrap method. CONCLUSIONS: The bootstrap method is optimal among the four methods and shows the cross-distribution superiority over the other three methods. However, a set of unified rules for the divide-and-conquer strategy need to be recommended for the bootstrap method, which is optimal when boot-p for p (person), boot-pi for i (item), and boot-i for pi (person × item). Public Library of Science 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10348584/ /pubmed/37450506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288069 Text en © 2023 Guangming Li https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Guangming
Which method is optimal for estimating variance components and their variability in generalizability theory? evidence form a set of unified rules for bootstrap method
title Which method is optimal for estimating variance components and their variability in generalizability theory? evidence form a set of unified rules for bootstrap method
title_full Which method is optimal for estimating variance components and their variability in generalizability theory? evidence form a set of unified rules for bootstrap method
title_fullStr Which method is optimal for estimating variance components and their variability in generalizability theory? evidence form a set of unified rules for bootstrap method
title_full_unstemmed Which method is optimal for estimating variance components and their variability in generalizability theory? evidence form a set of unified rules for bootstrap method
title_short Which method is optimal for estimating variance components and their variability in generalizability theory? evidence form a set of unified rules for bootstrap method
title_sort which method is optimal for estimating variance components and their variability in generalizability theory? evidence form a set of unified rules for bootstrap method
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10348584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37450506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288069
work_keys_str_mv AT liguangming whichmethodisoptimalforestimatingvariancecomponentsandtheirvariabilityingeneralizabilitytheoryevidenceformasetofunifiedrulesforbootstrapmethod