Cargando…
Evaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes
MOTIVATION: Despite near-experimental accuracy on single-chain predictions, there is still scope for improvement among multimeric predictions. Methods like AlphaFold-Multimer and FoldDock can accurately model dimers. However, how well these methods fare on larger complexes is still unclear. Further,...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10348836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37405868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btad424 |
_version_ | 1785073747209748480 |
---|---|
author | Zhu, Wensi Shenoy, Aditi Kundrotas, Petras Elofsson, Arne |
author_facet | Zhu, Wensi Shenoy, Aditi Kundrotas, Petras Elofsson, Arne |
author_sort | Zhu, Wensi |
collection | PubMed |
description | MOTIVATION: Despite near-experimental accuracy on single-chain predictions, there is still scope for improvement among multimeric predictions. Methods like AlphaFold-Multimer and FoldDock can accurately model dimers. However, how well these methods fare on larger complexes is still unclear. Further, evaluation methods of the quality of multimeric complexes are not well established. RESULTS: We analysed the performance of AlphaFold-Multimer on a homology-reduced dataset of homo- and heteromeric protein complexes. We highlight the differences between the pairwise and multi-interface evaluation of chains within a multimer. We describe why certain complexes perform well on one metric (e.g. TM-score) but poorly on another (e.g. DockQ). We propose a new score, Predicted DockQ version 2 (pDockQ2), to estimate the quality of each interface in a multimer. Finally, we modelled protein complexes (from CORUM) and identified two highly confident structures that do not have sequence homology to any existing structures. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All scripts, models, and data used to perform the analysis in this study are freely available at https://gitlab.com/ElofssonLab/afm-benchmark. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10348836 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103488362023-07-15 Evaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes Zhu, Wensi Shenoy, Aditi Kundrotas, Petras Elofsson, Arne Bioinformatics Original Paper MOTIVATION: Despite near-experimental accuracy on single-chain predictions, there is still scope for improvement among multimeric predictions. Methods like AlphaFold-Multimer and FoldDock can accurately model dimers. However, how well these methods fare on larger complexes is still unclear. Further, evaluation methods of the quality of multimeric complexes are not well established. RESULTS: We analysed the performance of AlphaFold-Multimer on a homology-reduced dataset of homo- and heteromeric protein complexes. We highlight the differences between the pairwise and multi-interface evaluation of chains within a multimer. We describe why certain complexes perform well on one metric (e.g. TM-score) but poorly on another (e.g. DockQ). We propose a new score, Predicted DockQ version 2 (pDockQ2), to estimate the quality of each interface in a multimer. Finally, we modelled protein complexes (from CORUM) and identified two highly confident structures that do not have sequence homology to any existing structures. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All scripts, models, and data used to perform the analysis in this study are freely available at https://gitlab.com/ElofssonLab/afm-benchmark. Oxford University Press 2023-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10348836/ /pubmed/37405868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btad424 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Zhu, Wensi Shenoy, Aditi Kundrotas, Petras Elofsson, Arne Evaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes |
title | Evaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes |
title_full | Evaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes |
title_short | Evaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes |
title_sort | evaluation of alphafold-multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10348836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37405868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btad424 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhuwensi evaluationofalphafoldmultimerpredictiononmultichainproteincomplexes AT shenoyaditi evaluationofalphafoldmultimerpredictiononmultichainproteincomplexes AT kundrotaspetras evaluationofalphafoldmultimerpredictiononmultichainproteincomplexes AT elofssonarne evaluationofalphafoldmultimerpredictiononmultichainproteincomplexes |