Cargando…

Evaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes

MOTIVATION: Despite near-experimental accuracy on single-chain predictions, there is still scope for improvement among multimeric predictions. Methods like AlphaFold-Multimer and FoldDock can accurately model dimers. However, how well these methods fare on larger complexes is still unclear. Further,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Wensi, Shenoy, Aditi, Kundrotas, Petras, Elofsson, Arne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10348836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37405868
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btad424
_version_ 1785073747209748480
author Zhu, Wensi
Shenoy, Aditi
Kundrotas, Petras
Elofsson, Arne
author_facet Zhu, Wensi
Shenoy, Aditi
Kundrotas, Petras
Elofsson, Arne
author_sort Zhu, Wensi
collection PubMed
description MOTIVATION: Despite near-experimental accuracy on single-chain predictions, there is still scope for improvement among multimeric predictions. Methods like AlphaFold-Multimer and FoldDock can accurately model dimers. However, how well these methods fare on larger complexes is still unclear. Further, evaluation methods of the quality of multimeric complexes are not well established. RESULTS: We analysed the performance of AlphaFold-Multimer on a homology-reduced dataset of homo- and heteromeric protein complexes. We highlight the differences between the pairwise and multi-interface evaluation of chains within a multimer. We describe why certain complexes perform well on one metric (e.g. TM-score) but poorly on another (e.g. DockQ). We propose a new score, Predicted DockQ version 2 (pDockQ2), to estimate the quality of each interface in a multimer. Finally, we modelled protein complexes (from CORUM) and identified two highly confident structures that do not have sequence homology to any existing structures. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All scripts, models, and data used to perform the analysis in this study are freely available at https://gitlab.com/ElofssonLab/afm-benchmark.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10348836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103488362023-07-15 Evaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes Zhu, Wensi Shenoy, Aditi Kundrotas, Petras Elofsson, Arne Bioinformatics Original Paper MOTIVATION: Despite near-experimental accuracy on single-chain predictions, there is still scope for improvement among multimeric predictions. Methods like AlphaFold-Multimer and FoldDock can accurately model dimers. However, how well these methods fare on larger complexes is still unclear. Further, evaluation methods of the quality of multimeric complexes are not well established. RESULTS: We analysed the performance of AlphaFold-Multimer on a homology-reduced dataset of homo- and heteromeric protein complexes. We highlight the differences between the pairwise and multi-interface evaluation of chains within a multimer. We describe why certain complexes perform well on one metric (e.g. TM-score) but poorly on another (e.g. DockQ). We propose a new score, Predicted DockQ version 2 (pDockQ2), to estimate the quality of each interface in a multimer. Finally, we modelled protein complexes (from CORUM) and identified two highly confident structures that do not have sequence homology to any existing structures. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All scripts, models, and data used to perform the analysis in this study are freely available at https://gitlab.com/ElofssonLab/afm-benchmark. Oxford University Press 2023-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10348836/ /pubmed/37405868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btad424 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Zhu, Wensi
Shenoy, Aditi
Kundrotas, Petras
Elofsson, Arne
Evaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes
title Evaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes
title_full Evaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes
title_fullStr Evaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes
title_short Evaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes
title_sort evaluation of alphafold-multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10348836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37405868
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btad424
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuwensi evaluationofalphafoldmultimerpredictiononmultichainproteincomplexes
AT shenoyaditi evaluationofalphafoldmultimerpredictiononmultichainproteincomplexes
AT kundrotaspetras evaluationofalphafoldmultimerpredictiononmultichainproteincomplexes
AT elofssonarne evaluationofalphafoldmultimerpredictiononmultichainproteincomplexes