Cargando…

Sexual functioning in women with functional hypothalamic amenorrhea: exploring the relevance of an underlying polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)-phenotype

PURPOSE: To study sexual function and distress in women with functional hypothalamic amenorrhea (FHA) compared to women with FHA and an underlying polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)-phenotype, considering also their psychometric variables. As a secondary aim, we explored the relationship between sexua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barbagallo, F., Pedrielli, G., Bosoni, D., Tiranini, L., Cucinella, L., Calogero, A. E., Facchinetti, F., Nappi, R. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10348938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36735200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40618-023-02021-7
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To study sexual function and distress in women with functional hypothalamic amenorrhea (FHA) compared to women with FHA and an underlying polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)-phenotype, considering also their psychometric variables. As a secondary aim, we explored the relationship between sexual functioning and hormonal milieu in these women. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted on 36 women with typical FHA and 43 women with FHA + PCOS-phenotype. The following validated psychometric questionnaires were administered: Female Sexual Functional Index (FSFI), Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised (FSDS-R), Body Attitude Test (BAT), Bulimia Investigation Test (BITE), State Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (MPS). Available hormones to formulate FHA diagnosis in the standard routine were considered. RESULTS: Women with typical FHA reported a significantly lower FSFI total score than women with FHA + PCOS-phenotype (95% CI for median 16–21.3 vs. 21.1–24.1, p = 0.002), whereas the FSDS-R score was similar in the two groups (95% CI for median 6–16 vs. 6–16.3). No statistically significant differences were evident in body attitude, state and trait anxiety, depression, bulimic risk, and perfectionism between the two groups, confirming the two FHA groups were superimposable from a psychometric perspective. State anxiety correlated negatively with the FSFI total score in both typical FHA (rho: − 0.33, p = 0.05) and FHA + PCOS-phenotype (rho: − 0.40, p = 0.009). In the entire study population, a positive correlation was found between luteinizing hormone, androstenedione, and 17ß-estradiol and the total FSFI score (rho: 0.28, p = 0.01; rho: 0.27, p = 0.01, rho: 0.27, p = 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Women with FHA showed a very high rate of sexual symptoms as part of their condition, but those with a typical diagnosis displayed a more severe sexual impairment as compared with the FHA + PCOS-phenotype, in spite of a similar psychometric profile. Sexual distress was equally present in both groups (approximately 4 out of 10 women). Further studies should be designed to investigate the potential role of sex hormones, mainly LH-driven androstenedione, in influencing women’s sexual functioning. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40618-023-02021-7.