Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of oral and sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: Misoprostol is a synthetic PGE(1) analogue that is used for induction of labour. Current guidelines support the use of doses that do not exceed 25 mcg in order to limit maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes. The present meta-analysis investigates the efficacy and safety of oral compared...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Pergialiotis, Vasilios, Panagiotopoulos, Michail, Constantinou, Therapon, Vogiatzi Vokotopoulou, Lito, Koumenis, Andreas, Stavros, Sofoklis, Voskos, Andreas, Daskalakis, George
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:	Review
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10348969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36472645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06867-9

Ejemplares similares

Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study
por: Bolla, Daniele, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Foley Catheter versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labour Induction
por: Noor, Nasreen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Sublingual misoprostol vs. oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor: A retrospective study
por: Amini, Mahdi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Misoprostol vs dinoprostone vaginal insert in labour induction: comparison of obstetrical outcome
por: Mlodawski, Jakub, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparison of Sublingual and Vaginal Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Pregnancy Terminations
por: Milani, Forozan, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Outcome of misoprostol and oxytocin in induction of labour
por: Acharya, Trishna, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Vaginal Versus Sublingual Misoprostol for Labor Induction at Term and Post Term: a Randomized Prospective Study
por: Ayati, Sedigheh, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Simplifying oral misoprostol protocols for the induction of labour
por: Weeks, AD, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Comparison of sublingual, vaginal, and oral misoprostol in cervical ripening for first trimester abortion
por: Parveen, Shagufta, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Sublingual versus Vaginal Misoprostol for the Induction of Labor at Term: A Randomized, Triple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial
por: Jahromi, Bahia Namavar, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

COMPARISON BETWEEN SUBLINGUAL AND VAGINAL ROUTE OF MISOPROSTOL IN MANAGEMENT OF FIRST TRIMESTER MISCARRIAGE MISSING
por: Dehbashi, Zahra, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Randomized controlled trial
por: Young, David C., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
por: Lapuente-Ocamica, O., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Induction of labour with sequential double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone in obese women
por: Kehl, Sven, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Labour Induction with Misoprostol in German Obstetric Clinics: What Are the Facts on Such Use?
por: Kehl, Sven, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study
por: Marsdal, Kjersti Engen, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Intravaginal Isoniazid (INH) and Sublingual Misoprostol Versus Sublingual Misoprostol Alone for First-Trimester Induced Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial
por: Haghighi, Ladan, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Pharmacokinetics of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for labor induction at term
por: Vorontsova, Yana, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

High fever following postpartum administration of sublingual misoprostol
por: Durocher, J, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Sublingual misoprostol and hyperpyrexia: case report with temperature curve
por: Tolefac, Paul Nkemtendong, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Role of Combination OF Mifepristone and Misoprostol Verses Misoprostol alone in Induction of Labour in Late Intrauterin Fetal Death: A Prospective Study
por: Panda, Subrat, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Comparison of Intracervical Foley’s Catheter With Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Kadu, Nivedita A, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol with Foley Catheter for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Vahid Roudsari, Fatemeh, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Effects of Misoprostol on Induction of Labour in Patients with Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis
por: Wang, Leilei, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Reduction in resource use with the misoprostol vaginal insert vs the dinoprostone vaginal insert for labour induction: a model-based analysis from a United Kingdom healthcare perspective
por: Draycott, T., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Neonatal hypoglycemia following antenatal corticosteroid treatment prior to elective cesarean delivery during the early term period: a meta-analysis
por: Pergialiotis, Vasilios, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Induction of labour in nulliparous women- quick or slow: a cohort study comparing slow-release vaginal insert with low-dose misoprostol oral tablets
por: Eriksson, Axelina, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Effect of extra-amniotic Foley’s catheter and vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone on cervical ripening and induction of labor in Kenya, a randomized controlled trial
por: Osoti, Alfred, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The Efficacy of Misoprostol Vaginal Inserts for Induction of Labor in Women with Very Unfavorable Cervices
por: Socha, Maciej W., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Retracted: Effects of Misoprostol on Induction of Labour in Patients with Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis
por: Healthcare Engineering, Journal of
Publicado: (2023)

The Induction with Foley OR Misoprostol (INFORM) Study dataset. A dataset of 602 women with hypertensive disease in pregnancy, in India, randomised to either Foley catheter or oral misoprostol for induction of labour
por: Mundle, Shuchita, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Oral Misoprostol alone versus oral misoprostol followed by oxytocin for labour induction in women with hypertension in pregnancy (MOLI): protocol for a randomised controlled trial
por: Bracken, Hillary, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Is Misoprostol Vaginal Insert Safe for the Induction of Labor in High-Risk Pregnancy Obese Women?
por: Varlas, Valentin Nicolae, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Maternal and fetal outcomes in women undergoing induction of labor with low dose vaginal misoprostol
por: Shafqat, Tanveer, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Heterogenous use of misoprostol for induction of labour: results of an online survey among midwives in German-speaking countries
por: Bossung, Verena, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Expression of Stemness Markers in the Cervical Smear of Patients with Cervical Insufficiency
por: Pittokopitou, Savvia, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Misoprostol administered sublingually at a dose of 12.5 μg versus vaginally at a dose of 25 μg for the induction of full-term labor: a randomized controlled trial
por: Gattás, Daniele S. M. B., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparison of Misoprostol and Dinoprostone for elective induction of labour in nulliparous women at full term: A randomized prospective study
por: Papanikolaou, Evangelos G, et al.
Publicado: (2004)

Induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the Foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol
por: Bracken, Hillary, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Safety and effectiveness of oral misoprostol for induction of labour in a resource-limited setting: a dose escalation study
por: Morris, Marilyn, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_p69ke74etda7vj203p571v5354