Cargando…

The Association between Apolipoprotein E Genotypes and Serum Malondialdehyde Level with End-Stage Renal Disease

BACKGROUND: The Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) polymorphism plays an important role in the pathophysiology of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Additionally, ApoE may contribute to the progression of oxidative stress. Thus, this study aimed to determine the ApoE gene polymorphism and evaluate the malondialde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pourmand, Daryoush, Veisi-Raygani, Asad, Bahrehmand, Fariborz, Asadi, Soheila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37456207
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/IJMS.2022.94850.2616
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) polymorphism plays an important role in the pathophysiology of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Additionally, ApoE may contribute to the progression of oxidative stress. Thus, this study aimed to determine the ApoE gene polymorphism and evaluate the malondialdehyde (MDA) level in ESRD patients and healthy individuals. METHODS: The present cross-sectional study was conducted at 2010 at Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (Kermanshah, Iran). The study population comprised ESRD patients (n=136) and healthy individuals (n=137). The MDA level was assessed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and the frequencies of ApoE gene alleles were analyzed using restriction fragment length polymorphism-polymerase chain reaction (RFLP-PCR). The data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), version 13. The significant differences of ApoE genotypes in case and control groups were assessed using Pearson’s Chi square tests, and two-tailed Student’s tests. A logistic regression model was used to calculate the odd ratio. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: According to the results, ESRD patients had a higher frequency of the E(2)/E(3) genotype than the healthy group (P<0.001). The results indicated that E(3)/E(4) genotype frequency in the patients’ group was higher than that of the control group (P=0.026). Furthermore, the E(3)/E(2) (OR=5.7, 95% CI=2.68-12.14) (P<0.001) and E(3)/E(4) (OR=1.57, 95% CI=1.05-2.34) (P=0.029) genotypes were found to increase the risk of ESRD. Moreover, the MDA level in ESRD patients was higher than the healthy individuals (P<0.001). The patients with E(3)/E(2) (P<0.001) and E(3)/E(4) (P<0.001) genotypes had a higher level of MDA than the control group. CONCLUSION: According to the findings, patients with ESRD had higher genotypes of E(3)/E(2) and E(3)/E(4), which suggests a higher risk of developing ESRD.