Cargando…

Disease progression joint model predicts time to type 1 diabetes onset: Optimizing future type 1 diabetes prevention studies

Clinical trials seeking type 1 diabetes prevention are challenging in terms of identifying patient populations likely to progress to type 1 diabetes within limited (i.e., short‐term) trial durations. Hence, we sought to improve such efforts by developing a quantitative disease progression model for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morales, Juan Francisco, Muse, Rhoda, Podichetty, Jagdeep T., Burton, Jackson, David, Sarah, Lang, Patrick, Schmidt, Stephan, Romero, Klaus, O'Doherty, Inish, Martin, Frank, Campbell‐Thompson, Martha, Haller, Michael J., Atkinson, Mark A., Kim, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37186151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12973
_version_ 1785073849455345664
author Morales, Juan Francisco
Muse, Rhoda
Podichetty, Jagdeep T.
Burton, Jackson
David, Sarah
Lang, Patrick
Schmidt, Stephan
Romero, Klaus
O'Doherty, Inish
Martin, Frank
Campbell‐Thompson, Martha
Haller, Michael J.
Atkinson, Mark A.
Kim, Sarah
author_facet Morales, Juan Francisco
Muse, Rhoda
Podichetty, Jagdeep T.
Burton, Jackson
David, Sarah
Lang, Patrick
Schmidt, Stephan
Romero, Klaus
O'Doherty, Inish
Martin, Frank
Campbell‐Thompson, Martha
Haller, Michael J.
Atkinson, Mark A.
Kim, Sarah
author_sort Morales, Juan Francisco
collection PubMed
description Clinical trials seeking type 1 diabetes prevention are challenging in terms of identifying patient populations likely to progress to type 1 diabetes within limited (i.e., short‐term) trial durations. Hence, we sought to improve such efforts by developing a quantitative disease progression model for type 1 diabetes. Individual‐level data obtained from the TrialNet Pathway to Prevention and The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young natural history studies were used to develop a joint model that links the longitudinal glycemic measure to the timing of type 1 diabetes diagnosis. Baseline covariates were assessed using a stepwise covariate modeling approach. Our study focused on individuals at risk of developing type 1 diabetes with the presence of two or more diabetes‐related autoantibodies (AAbs). The developed model successfully quantified how patient features measured at baseline, including HbA1c and the presence of different AAbs, alter the timing of type 1 diabetes diagnosis with reasonable accuracy and precision (<30% RSE). In addition, selected covariates were statistically significant (p < 0.0001 Wald test). The Weibull model best captured the timing to type 1 diabetes diagnosis. The 2‐h oral glucose tolerance values assessed at each visit were included as a time‐varying biomarker, which was best quantified using the sigmoid maximum effect function. This model provides a framework to quantitatively predict and simulate the time to type 1 diabetes diagnosis in individuals at risk of developing the disease and thus, aligns with the needs of pharmaceutical companies and scientists seeking to advance therapies aimed at interdicting the disease process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10349195
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103491952023-07-16 Disease progression joint model predicts time to type 1 diabetes onset: Optimizing future type 1 diabetes prevention studies Morales, Juan Francisco Muse, Rhoda Podichetty, Jagdeep T. Burton, Jackson David, Sarah Lang, Patrick Schmidt, Stephan Romero, Klaus O'Doherty, Inish Martin, Frank Campbell‐Thompson, Martha Haller, Michael J. Atkinson, Mark A. Kim, Sarah CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol Research Clinical trials seeking type 1 diabetes prevention are challenging in terms of identifying patient populations likely to progress to type 1 diabetes within limited (i.e., short‐term) trial durations. Hence, we sought to improve such efforts by developing a quantitative disease progression model for type 1 diabetes. Individual‐level data obtained from the TrialNet Pathway to Prevention and The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young natural history studies were used to develop a joint model that links the longitudinal glycemic measure to the timing of type 1 diabetes diagnosis. Baseline covariates were assessed using a stepwise covariate modeling approach. Our study focused on individuals at risk of developing type 1 diabetes with the presence of two or more diabetes‐related autoantibodies (AAbs). The developed model successfully quantified how patient features measured at baseline, including HbA1c and the presence of different AAbs, alter the timing of type 1 diabetes diagnosis with reasonable accuracy and precision (<30% RSE). In addition, selected covariates were statistically significant (p < 0.0001 Wald test). The Weibull model best captured the timing to type 1 diabetes diagnosis. The 2‐h oral glucose tolerance values assessed at each visit were included as a time‐varying biomarker, which was best quantified using the sigmoid maximum effect function. This model provides a framework to quantitatively predict and simulate the time to type 1 diabetes diagnosis in individuals at risk of developing the disease and thus, aligns with the needs of pharmaceutical companies and scientists seeking to advance therapies aimed at interdicting the disease process. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10349195/ /pubmed/37186151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12973 Text en © 2023 The Authors. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research
Morales, Juan Francisco
Muse, Rhoda
Podichetty, Jagdeep T.
Burton, Jackson
David, Sarah
Lang, Patrick
Schmidt, Stephan
Romero, Klaus
O'Doherty, Inish
Martin, Frank
Campbell‐Thompson, Martha
Haller, Michael J.
Atkinson, Mark A.
Kim, Sarah
Disease progression joint model predicts time to type 1 diabetes onset: Optimizing future type 1 diabetes prevention studies
title Disease progression joint model predicts time to type 1 diabetes onset: Optimizing future type 1 diabetes prevention studies
title_full Disease progression joint model predicts time to type 1 diabetes onset: Optimizing future type 1 diabetes prevention studies
title_fullStr Disease progression joint model predicts time to type 1 diabetes onset: Optimizing future type 1 diabetes prevention studies
title_full_unstemmed Disease progression joint model predicts time to type 1 diabetes onset: Optimizing future type 1 diabetes prevention studies
title_short Disease progression joint model predicts time to type 1 diabetes onset: Optimizing future type 1 diabetes prevention studies
title_sort disease progression joint model predicts time to type 1 diabetes onset: optimizing future type 1 diabetes prevention studies
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37186151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12973
work_keys_str_mv AT moralesjuanfrancisco diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies
AT muserhoda diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies
AT podichettyjagdeept diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies
AT burtonjackson diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies
AT davidsarah diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies
AT langpatrick diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies
AT schmidtstephan diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies
AT romeroklaus diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies
AT odohertyinish diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies
AT martinfrank diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies
AT campbellthompsonmartha diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies
AT hallermichaelj diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies
AT atkinsonmarka diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies
AT kimsarah diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies