Cargando…
Disease progression joint model predicts time to type 1 diabetes onset: Optimizing future type 1 diabetes prevention studies
Clinical trials seeking type 1 diabetes prevention are challenging in terms of identifying patient populations likely to progress to type 1 diabetes within limited (i.e., short‐term) trial durations. Hence, we sought to improve such efforts by developing a quantitative disease progression model for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37186151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12973 |
_version_ | 1785073849455345664 |
---|---|
author | Morales, Juan Francisco Muse, Rhoda Podichetty, Jagdeep T. Burton, Jackson David, Sarah Lang, Patrick Schmidt, Stephan Romero, Klaus O'Doherty, Inish Martin, Frank Campbell‐Thompson, Martha Haller, Michael J. Atkinson, Mark A. Kim, Sarah |
author_facet | Morales, Juan Francisco Muse, Rhoda Podichetty, Jagdeep T. Burton, Jackson David, Sarah Lang, Patrick Schmidt, Stephan Romero, Klaus O'Doherty, Inish Martin, Frank Campbell‐Thompson, Martha Haller, Michael J. Atkinson, Mark A. Kim, Sarah |
author_sort | Morales, Juan Francisco |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clinical trials seeking type 1 diabetes prevention are challenging in terms of identifying patient populations likely to progress to type 1 diabetes within limited (i.e., short‐term) trial durations. Hence, we sought to improve such efforts by developing a quantitative disease progression model for type 1 diabetes. Individual‐level data obtained from the TrialNet Pathway to Prevention and The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young natural history studies were used to develop a joint model that links the longitudinal glycemic measure to the timing of type 1 diabetes diagnosis. Baseline covariates were assessed using a stepwise covariate modeling approach. Our study focused on individuals at risk of developing type 1 diabetes with the presence of two or more diabetes‐related autoantibodies (AAbs). The developed model successfully quantified how patient features measured at baseline, including HbA1c and the presence of different AAbs, alter the timing of type 1 diabetes diagnosis with reasonable accuracy and precision (<30% RSE). In addition, selected covariates were statistically significant (p < 0.0001 Wald test). The Weibull model best captured the timing to type 1 diabetes diagnosis. The 2‐h oral glucose tolerance values assessed at each visit were included as a time‐varying biomarker, which was best quantified using the sigmoid maximum effect function. This model provides a framework to quantitatively predict and simulate the time to type 1 diabetes diagnosis in individuals at risk of developing the disease and thus, aligns with the needs of pharmaceutical companies and scientists seeking to advance therapies aimed at interdicting the disease process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10349195 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103491952023-07-16 Disease progression joint model predicts time to type 1 diabetes onset: Optimizing future type 1 diabetes prevention studies Morales, Juan Francisco Muse, Rhoda Podichetty, Jagdeep T. Burton, Jackson David, Sarah Lang, Patrick Schmidt, Stephan Romero, Klaus O'Doherty, Inish Martin, Frank Campbell‐Thompson, Martha Haller, Michael J. Atkinson, Mark A. Kim, Sarah CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol Research Clinical trials seeking type 1 diabetes prevention are challenging in terms of identifying patient populations likely to progress to type 1 diabetes within limited (i.e., short‐term) trial durations. Hence, we sought to improve such efforts by developing a quantitative disease progression model for type 1 diabetes. Individual‐level data obtained from the TrialNet Pathway to Prevention and The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young natural history studies were used to develop a joint model that links the longitudinal glycemic measure to the timing of type 1 diabetes diagnosis. Baseline covariates were assessed using a stepwise covariate modeling approach. Our study focused on individuals at risk of developing type 1 diabetes with the presence of two or more diabetes‐related autoantibodies (AAbs). The developed model successfully quantified how patient features measured at baseline, including HbA1c and the presence of different AAbs, alter the timing of type 1 diabetes diagnosis with reasonable accuracy and precision (<30% RSE). In addition, selected covariates were statistically significant (p < 0.0001 Wald test). The Weibull model best captured the timing to type 1 diabetes diagnosis. The 2‐h oral glucose tolerance values assessed at each visit were included as a time‐varying biomarker, which was best quantified using the sigmoid maximum effect function. This model provides a framework to quantitatively predict and simulate the time to type 1 diabetes diagnosis in individuals at risk of developing the disease and thus, aligns with the needs of pharmaceutical companies and scientists seeking to advance therapies aimed at interdicting the disease process. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10349195/ /pubmed/37186151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12973 Text en © 2023 The Authors. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Morales, Juan Francisco Muse, Rhoda Podichetty, Jagdeep T. Burton, Jackson David, Sarah Lang, Patrick Schmidt, Stephan Romero, Klaus O'Doherty, Inish Martin, Frank Campbell‐Thompson, Martha Haller, Michael J. Atkinson, Mark A. Kim, Sarah Disease progression joint model predicts time to type 1 diabetes onset: Optimizing future type 1 diabetes prevention studies |
title | Disease progression joint model predicts time to type 1 diabetes onset: Optimizing future type 1 diabetes prevention studies |
title_full | Disease progression joint model predicts time to type 1 diabetes onset: Optimizing future type 1 diabetes prevention studies |
title_fullStr | Disease progression joint model predicts time to type 1 diabetes onset: Optimizing future type 1 diabetes prevention studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Disease progression joint model predicts time to type 1 diabetes onset: Optimizing future type 1 diabetes prevention studies |
title_short | Disease progression joint model predicts time to type 1 diabetes onset: Optimizing future type 1 diabetes prevention studies |
title_sort | disease progression joint model predicts time to type 1 diabetes onset: optimizing future type 1 diabetes prevention studies |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37186151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12973 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moralesjuanfrancisco diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies AT muserhoda diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies AT podichettyjagdeept diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies AT burtonjackson diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies AT davidsarah diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies AT langpatrick diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies AT schmidtstephan diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies AT romeroklaus diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies AT odohertyinish diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies AT martinfrank diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies AT campbellthompsonmartha diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies AT hallermichaelj diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies AT atkinsonmarka diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies AT kimsarah diseaseprogressionjointmodelpredictstimetotype1diabetesonsetoptimizingfuturetype1diabetespreventionstudies |