Cargando…

Assessing collaborative efforts of making care fit for each patient: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION: For too many people, their care plans are designed without fully accounting for who they are, the lives they live, what matters to them or what they aspire to achieve. We aimed to summarize instruments capable of measuring dimensions of patient–clinician collaboration to make care fit....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kunneman, Marleen, Gravholt, Derek, Hartasanchez, Sandra A., Gionfriddo, Michael R., Paskins, Zoe, Prokop, Larry J., Stiggelbout, Anne M., Montori, Victor M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36973176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13759
_version_ 1785073856459833344
author Kunneman, Marleen
Gravholt, Derek
Hartasanchez, Sandra A.
Gionfriddo, Michael R.
Paskins, Zoe
Prokop, Larry J.
Stiggelbout, Anne M.
Montori, Victor M.
author_facet Kunneman, Marleen
Gravholt, Derek
Hartasanchez, Sandra A.
Gionfriddo, Michael R.
Paskins, Zoe
Prokop, Larry J.
Stiggelbout, Anne M.
Montori, Victor M.
author_sort Kunneman, Marleen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: For too many people, their care plans are designed without fully accounting for who they are, the lives they live, what matters to them or what they aspire to achieve. We aimed to summarize instruments capable of measuring dimensions of patient–clinician collaboration to make care fit. METHODS: We systematically searched several databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus and Web of Science) from inception to September 2021 for studies using quantitative measures to assess, evaluate or rate the work of making care fit by any participant in real‐life clinical encounters. Eligibility was assessed in duplicate. After extracting all items from relevant instruments, we coded them deductively on dimensions relevant to making care fit (as presented in a recent Making Care Fit Manifesto), and inductively on the main action described. RESULTS: We included 189 papers, mostly from North America (N = 83, 44%) and in the context of primary care (N = 54, 29%). Half of the papers (N = 88, 47%) were published in the last 5 years. We found 1243 relevant items to assess efforts of making care fit, included within 151 instruments. Most items related to the dimensions ‘Patient‐clinician collaboration: content’ (N = 396, 32%) and ‘Patient‐clinician collaboration: manner’ (N = 382, 31%) and the least related to ‘Ongoing and iterative process’ (N = 22, 2%) and in ‘Minimally disruptive of patient lives’ (N = 29, 2%). The items referred to 27 specific actions. Most items referred to ‘Informing’ (N = 308, 25%) and ‘Exploring’ (N = 93, 8%), the fewest items referred to ‘Following up’, ‘Comforting’ and ‘Praising’ (each N = 3, 0.2%). DISCUSSION: Measures of the work that patients and clinicians do together to make care fit focus heavily on the content of their collaborations, particularly on exchanging information. Other dimensions and actions previously identified as crucial to making care fit are assessed infrequently or not at all. The breadth of extant measures of making care fit and the lack of appropriate measures of this key construct limit both the assessment and the successful implementation of efforts to improve patient care. PATIENT CONTRIBUTION: Patients and caregivers from the ‘Making care fit Collaborative’ were involved in drafting the dimensions relevant to patient–clinician collaboration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10349223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103492232023-07-16 Assessing collaborative efforts of making care fit for each patient: A systematic review Kunneman, Marleen Gravholt, Derek Hartasanchez, Sandra A. Gionfriddo, Michael R. Paskins, Zoe Prokop, Larry J. Stiggelbout, Anne M. Montori, Victor M. Health Expect Review Articles INTRODUCTION: For too many people, their care plans are designed without fully accounting for who they are, the lives they live, what matters to them or what they aspire to achieve. We aimed to summarize instruments capable of measuring dimensions of patient–clinician collaboration to make care fit. METHODS: We systematically searched several databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus and Web of Science) from inception to September 2021 for studies using quantitative measures to assess, evaluate or rate the work of making care fit by any participant in real‐life clinical encounters. Eligibility was assessed in duplicate. After extracting all items from relevant instruments, we coded them deductively on dimensions relevant to making care fit (as presented in a recent Making Care Fit Manifesto), and inductively on the main action described. RESULTS: We included 189 papers, mostly from North America (N = 83, 44%) and in the context of primary care (N = 54, 29%). Half of the papers (N = 88, 47%) were published in the last 5 years. We found 1243 relevant items to assess efforts of making care fit, included within 151 instruments. Most items related to the dimensions ‘Patient‐clinician collaboration: content’ (N = 396, 32%) and ‘Patient‐clinician collaboration: manner’ (N = 382, 31%) and the least related to ‘Ongoing and iterative process’ (N = 22, 2%) and in ‘Minimally disruptive of patient lives’ (N = 29, 2%). The items referred to 27 specific actions. Most items referred to ‘Informing’ (N = 308, 25%) and ‘Exploring’ (N = 93, 8%), the fewest items referred to ‘Following up’, ‘Comforting’ and ‘Praising’ (each N = 3, 0.2%). DISCUSSION: Measures of the work that patients and clinicians do together to make care fit focus heavily on the content of their collaborations, particularly on exchanging information. Other dimensions and actions previously identified as crucial to making care fit are assessed infrequently or not at all. The breadth of extant measures of making care fit and the lack of appropriate measures of this key construct limit both the assessment and the successful implementation of efforts to improve patient care. PATIENT CONTRIBUTION: Patients and caregivers from the ‘Making care fit Collaborative’ were involved in drafting the dimensions relevant to patient–clinician collaboration. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10349223/ /pubmed/36973176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13759 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Kunneman, Marleen
Gravholt, Derek
Hartasanchez, Sandra A.
Gionfriddo, Michael R.
Paskins, Zoe
Prokop, Larry J.
Stiggelbout, Anne M.
Montori, Victor M.
Assessing collaborative efforts of making care fit for each patient: A systematic review
title Assessing collaborative efforts of making care fit for each patient: A systematic review
title_full Assessing collaborative efforts of making care fit for each patient: A systematic review
title_fullStr Assessing collaborative efforts of making care fit for each patient: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Assessing collaborative efforts of making care fit for each patient: A systematic review
title_short Assessing collaborative efforts of making care fit for each patient: A systematic review
title_sort assessing collaborative efforts of making care fit for each patient: a systematic review
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36973176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13759
work_keys_str_mv AT kunnemanmarleen assessingcollaborativeeffortsofmakingcarefitforeachpatientasystematicreview
AT gravholtderek assessingcollaborativeeffortsofmakingcarefitforeachpatientasystematicreview
AT hartasanchezsandraa assessingcollaborativeeffortsofmakingcarefitforeachpatientasystematicreview
AT gionfriddomichaelr assessingcollaborativeeffortsofmakingcarefitforeachpatientasystematicreview
AT paskinszoe assessingcollaborativeeffortsofmakingcarefitforeachpatientasystematicreview
AT prokoplarryj assessingcollaborativeeffortsofmakingcarefitforeachpatientasystematicreview
AT stiggelboutannem assessingcollaborativeeffortsofmakingcarefitforeachpatientasystematicreview
AT montorivictorm assessingcollaborativeeffortsofmakingcarefitforeachpatientasystematicreview