Cargando…

Indirect Spinal Canal Decompression Using Ligamentotaxis Compared With Direct Posterior Canal Decompression in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study

BACKGROUND: There is still no standard of care to manage thoracolumbar burst fractures. With all the recent advances, posterior approaches are still one of the mainstays of treatment. On the other hand, while spinal canal decompression in neurological impaired patients is an important goal of treatm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shokouhi, Ghaffar, Iranmehr, Arad, Ghoilpour, Peyman, Fattahi, Mohammad Reza, Mousavi, Seyed Taher, Bitaraf, Mohammad Ali, Sarpoolaki, Mohammad Kazem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37457417
http://dx.doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.37.59
_version_ 1785073883278213120
author Shokouhi, Ghaffar
Iranmehr, Arad
Ghoilpour, Peyman
Fattahi, Mohammad Reza
Mousavi, Seyed Taher
Bitaraf, Mohammad Ali
Sarpoolaki, Mohammad Kazem
author_facet Shokouhi, Ghaffar
Iranmehr, Arad
Ghoilpour, Peyman
Fattahi, Mohammad Reza
Mousavi, Seyed Taher
Bitaraf, Mohammad Ali
Sarpoolaki, Mohammad Kazem
author_sort Shokouhi, Ghaffar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is still no standard of care to manage thoracolumbar burst fractures. With all the recent advances, posterior approaches are still one of the mainstays of treatment. On the other hand, while spinal canal decompression in neurological impaired patients is an important goal of treatment, its technique remains controversial. This study compared the effects of direct laminectomy decompression against ligamentotaxis/indirect canal decompression on neurological and radiographic improvements. METHODS: A prospective double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted on 60 thoracolumbar burst-fracture patients meeting our inclusion and exclusion criteria. They were randomized into 2 treatment arms: (1) direct decompression using laminectomy and (2) indirect decompression using ligamentotaxis/distraction. Each patient was observed for 6 months, and their neurological and radiographical data were collected prospectively. Statistical analysis was done by the Student t test, Friedman test, Mann Whitney-U test, Wilcoxon ranked test, and 1-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: Among 60 patients enrolled in our study, each treatment arm had an improvement in Frankel scores but there was no difference between the groups at any given time. After 6 months of surgery, local sagittal kyphosis improved in both groups (from 32.2 to 7.43 and 29.93 to 8.77 for the indirect and direct groups, respectively), as well as anterior vertebral height ratio (from 57.73 to 70.7 and 62.17 to 66.27 for the indirect and direct group, respectively) and posterior vertebral height ratio (from 61.17 to 74.87 and 64 to 67.5 for the indirect and direct group, respectively). For between-group comparisons after 6 months, there was a significant difference only for posterior vertebral height ratio (P = 0.040). CONCLUSION: Posterior approaches with ligamentotaxis have shown to be safe and may present the same outcome as direct decompression techniques using wide laminectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10349365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103493652023-07-16 Indirect Spinal Canal Decompression Using Ligamentotaxis Compared With Direct Posterior Canal Decompression in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study Shokouhi, Ghaffar Iranmehr, Arad Ghoilpour, Peyman Fattahi, Mohammad Reza Mousavi, Seyed Taher Bitaraf, Mohammad Ali Sarpoolaki, Mohammad Kazem Med J Islam Repub Iran Original Article BACKGROUND: There is still no standard of care to manage thoracolumbar burst fractures. With all the recent advances, posterior approaches are still one of the mainstays of treatment. On the other hand, while spinal canal decompression in neurological impaired patients is an important goal of treatment, its technique remains controversial. This study compared the effects of direct laminectomy decompression against ligamentotaxis/indirect canal decompression on neurological and radiographic improvements. METHODS: A prospective double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted on 60 thoracolumbar burst-fracture patients meeting our inclusion and exclusion criteria. They were randomized into 2 treatment arms: (1) direct decompression using laminectomy and (2) indirect decompression using ligamentotaxis/distraction. Each patient was observed for 6 months, and their neurological and radiographical data were collected prospectively. Statistical analysis was done by the Student t test, Friedman test, Mann Whitney-U test, Wilcoxon ranked test, and 1-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: Among 60 patients enrolled in our study, each treatment arm had an improvement in Frankel scores but there was no difference between the groups at any given time. After 6 months of surgery, local sagittal kyphosis improved in both groups (from 32.2 to 7.43 and 29.93 to 8.77 for the indirect and direct groups, respectively), as well as anterior vertebral height ratio (from 57.73 to 70.7 and 62.17 to 66.27 for the indirect and direct group, respectively) and posterior vertebral height ratio (from 61.17 to 74.87 and 64 to 67.5 for the indirect and direct group, respectively). For between-group comparisons after 6 months, there was a significant difference only for posterior vertebral height ratio (P = 0.040). CONCLUSION: Posterior approaches with ligamentotaxis have shown to be safe and may present the same outcome as direct decompression techniques using wide laminectomy. Iran University of Medical Sciences 2023-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10349365/ /pubmed/37457417 http://dx.doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.37.59 Text en © 2023 Iran University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/1.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-ShareAlike 1.0 License (CC BY-NC-SA 1.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shokouhi, Ghaffar
Iranmehr, Arad
Ghoilpour, Peyman
Fattahi, Mohammad Reza
Mousavi, Seyed Taher
Bitaraf, Mohammad Ali
Sarpoolaki, Mohammad Kazem
Indirect Spinal Canal Decompression Using Ligamentotaxis Compared With Direct Posterior Canal Decompression in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study
title Indirect Spinal Canal Decompression Using Ligamentotaxis Compared With Direct Posterior Canal Decompression in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_full Indirect Spinal Canal Decompression Using Ligamentotaxis Compared With Direct Posterior Canal Decompression in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_fullStr Indirect Spinal Canal Decompression Using Ligamentotaxis Compared With Direct Posterior Canal Decompression in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_full_unstemmed Indirect Spinal Canal Decompression Using Ligamentotaxis Compared With Direct Posterior Canal Decompression in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_short Indirect Spinal Canal Decompression Using Ligamentotaxis Compared With Direct Posterior Canal Decompression in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_sort indirect spinal canal decompression using ligamentotaxis compared with direct posterior canal decompression in thoracolumbar burst fractures: a prospective randomized study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37457417
http://dx.doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.37.59
work_keys_str_mv AT shokouhighaffar indirectspinalcanaldecompressionusingligamentotaxiscomparedwithdirectposteriorcanaldecompressioninthoracolumbarburstfracturesaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT iranmehrarad indirectspinalcanaldecompressionusingligamentotaxiscomparedwithdirectposteriorcanaldecompressioninthoracolumbarburstfracturesaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT ghoilpourpeyman indirectspinalcanaldecompressionusingligamentotaxiscomparedwithdirectposteriorcanaldecompressioninthoracolumbarburstfracturesaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT fattahimohammadreza indirectspinalcanaldecompressionusingligamentotaxiscomparedwithdirectposteriorcanaldecompressioninthoracolumbarburstfracturesaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT mousaviseyedtaher indirectspinalcanaldecompressionusingligamentotaxiscomparedwithdirectposteriorcanaldecompressioninthoracolumbarburstfracturesaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT bitarafmohammadali indirectspinalcanaldecompressionusingligamentotaxiscomparedwithdirectposteriorcanaldecompressioninthoracolumbarburstfracturesaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT sarpoolakimohammadkazem indirectspinalcanaldecompressionusingligamentotaxiscomparedwithdirectposteriorcanaldecompressioninthoracolumbarburstfracturesaprospectiverandomizedstudy