Cargando…

Do peer-based education interventions effectively improve vaccination acceptance? a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Vaccination efforts are a vital part of controlling the spread of diseases, however, lack of vaccine acceptance undermines the efficacy of this public health effort. Current evidence suggests that the most effective interventions to support vaccination uptake and positive vaccination bel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gobbo, Elisa L. S., Hanson, Claudia, Abunnaja, Khadija S. S., van Wees, Sibylle Herzig
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37452295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16294-3
_version_ 1785073902469251072
author Gobbo, Elisa L. S.
Hanson, Claudia
Abunnaja, Khadija S. S.
van Wees, Sibylle Herzig
author_facet Gobbo, Elisa L. S.
Hanson, Claudia
Abunnaja, Khadija S. S.
van Wees, Sibylle Herzig
author_sort Gobbo, Elisa L. S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vaccination efforts are a vital part of controlling the spread of diseases, however, lack of vaccine acceptance undermines the efficacy of this public health effort. Current evidence suggests that the most effective interventions to support vaccination uptake and positive vaccination beliefs are multicomponent, and dialogue based. Peer-based education interventions are such a strategy that involves an individual within the same group to act as the vaccine educator. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to consolidate the quantitative evidence surrounding the effectiveness and experience of peer-based education initiatives to improve vaccination beliefs and behaviors. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and a hand reference search. The search was conducted between April and June 2022. The inclusion criteria encompassed using peers, being education based, and being an intervention that addresses vaccination beliefs and behaviors (e.g. vaccination uptake). RESULTS: Systematic screening revealed 16 articles in the final review. Half of the studies focused on students as their study population. The human papillomavirus vaccine was the most common vaccine assessed in the studies, followed by COVID and influenza vaccines. 11 out of 16 of the articles reported a positive impact of the peer intervention and two studies had mixed results. Six studies suggest a mixed peer- healthcare expert approach. CONCLUSIONS: Despite reported positive effects of using peer-education based initiatives to improve vaccine uptake and beliefs, this systematic review reveals that there is limited existing research in support of this strategy. The strategies that initially appear the most effect are those with a combined peer and health-expert approach, and those that have more group specific and long-term peer interventions. More research is needed to confirm these results and to assess the effectiveness of a peer-based education intervention in a wider variety of settings and for other vaccine types. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-16294-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10349425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103494252023-07-16 Do peer-based education interventions effectively improve vaccination acceptance? a systematic review Gobbo, Elisa L. S. Hanson, Claudia Abunnaja, Khadija S. S. van Wees, Sibylle Herzig BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Vaccination efforts are a vital part of controlling the spread of diseases, however, lack of vaccine acceptance undermines the efficacy of this public health effort. Current evidence suggests that the most effective interventions to support vaccination uptake and positive vaccination beliefs are multicomponent, and dialogue based. Peer-based education interventions are such a strategy that involves an individual within the same group to act as the vaccine educator. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to consolidate the quantitative evidence surrounding the effectiveness and experience of peer-based education initiatives to improve vaccination beliefs and behaviors. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and a hand reference search. The search was conducted between April and June 2022. The inclusion criteria encompassed using peers, being education based, and being an intervention that addresses vaccination beliefs and behaviors (e.g. vaccination uptake). RESULTS: Systematic screening revealed 16 articles in the final review. Half of the studies focused on students as their study population. The human papillomavirus vaccine was the most common vaccine assessed in the studies, followed by COVID and influenza vaccines. 11 out of 16 of the articles reported a positive impact of the peer intervention and two studies had mixed results. Six studies suggest a mixed peer- healthcare expert approach. CONCLUSIONS: Despite reported positive effects of using peer-education based initiatives to improve vaccine uptake and beliefs, this systematic review reveals that there is limited existing research in support of this strategy. The strategies that initially appear the most effect are those with a combined peer and health-expert approach, and those that have more group specific and long-term peer interventions. More research is needed to confirm these results and to assess the effectiveness of a peer-based education intervention in a wider variety of settings and for other vaccine types. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-16294-3. BioMed Central 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10349425/ /pubmed/37452295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16294-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gobbo, Elisa L. S.
Hanson, Claudia
Abunnaja, Khadija S. S.
van Wees, Sibylle Herzig
Do peer-based education interventions effectively improve vaccination acceptance? a systematic review
title Do peer-based education interventions effectively improve vaccination acceptance? a systematic review
title_full Do peer-based education interventions effectively improve vaccination acceptance? a systematic review
title_fullStr Do peer-based education interventions effectively improve vaccination acceptance? a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Do peer-based education interventions effectively improve vaccination acceptance? a systematic review
title_short Do peer-based education interventions effectively improve vaccination acceptance? a systematic review
title_sort do peer-based education interventions effectively improve vaccination acceptance? a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37452295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16294-3
work_keys_str_mv AT gobboelisals dopeerbasededucationinterventionseffectivelyimprovevaccinationacceptanceasystematicreview
AT hansonclaudia dopeerbasededucationinterventionseffectivelyimprovevaccinationacceptanceasystematicreview
AT abunnajakhadijass dopeerbasededucationinterventionseffectivelyimprovevaccinationacceptanceasystematicreview
AT vanweessibylleherzig dopeerbasededucationinterventionseffectivelyimprovevaccinationacceptanceasystematicreview