Cargando…

Food taboos and animal conservation: a systematic review on how cultural expressions influence interaction with wildlife species

BACKGROUND: Human societies have food taboos as social rules that restrict access to a particular animal. Taboos are pointed out as tools for the conservation of animals, considering that the presence of this social rule prevents the consumption of animals. This work consists of a systematic review...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Landim, André Santos, de Menezes Souza, Jeferson, dos Santos, Lucrécia Braz, de Freitas Lins-Neto, Ernani Machado, da Silva, Daniel Tenório, Ferreira, Felipe Silva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37454092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-023-00600-9
_version_ 1785073902704132096
author Landim, André Santos
de Menezes Souza, Jeferson
dos Santos, Lucrécia Braz
de Freitas Lins-Neto, Ernani Machado
da Silva, Daniel Tenório
Ferreira, Felipe Silva
author_facet Landim, André Santos
de Menezes Souza, Jeferson
dos Santos, Lucrécia Braz
de Freitas Lins-Neto, Ernani Machado
da Silva, Daniel Tenório
Ferreira, Felipe Silva
author_sort Landim, André Santos
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Human societies have food taboos as social rules that restrict access to a particular animal. Taboos are pointed out as tools for the conservation of animals, considering that the presence of this social rule prevents the consumption of animals. This work consists of a systematic review that aimed to verify how food taboos vary between different animal species, and how this relationship has influenced their conservation. METHODS: For this systematic review, the search for articles by keywords took place in the databases “Science Direct,” Scopus,” “SciELo” and “Web of Science,” associating the term “taboo” with the taxa “amphibians,” “birds,” “mammals,” “fish” and “reptiles.” From this search, 3959 titles were found related to the key terms of the research. After the entire screening process carried out by paired reviewers, only 25 articles were included in the search. RESULTS: It was identified that 100 species of animals are related to some type of taboo, and segmental taboos and specific taboos were predominant, with 93 and 31 citations, respectively. In addition, the taxon with the most taboos recorded was fish, followed by mammals. Our findings indicate that the taboo protects 99% of the animal species mentioned, being a crucial tool for the conservation of these species. CONCLUSIONS: The present study covered the status of current knowledge about food taboos associated with wildlife in the world. It is noticeable that taboos have a considerable effect on animal conservation, as the social restrictions imposed by taboos effectively contribute to the local conservation of species. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13002-023-00600-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10349426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103494262023-07-16 Food taboos and animal conservation: a systematic review on how cultural expressions influence interaction with wildlife species Landim, André Santos de Menezes Souza, Jeferson dos Santos, Lucrécia Braz de Freitas Lins-Neto, Ernani Machado da Silva, Daniel Tenório Ferreira, Felipe Silva J Ethnobiol Ethnomed Review BACKGROUND: Human societies have food taboos as social rules that restrict access to a particular animal. Taboos are pointed out as tools for the conservation of animals, considering that the presence of this social rule prevents the consumption of animals. This work consists of a systematic review that aimed to verify how food taboos vary between different animal species, and how this relationship has influenced their conservation. METHODS: For this systematic review, the search for articles by keywords took place in the databases “Science Direct,” Scopus,” “SciELo” and “Web of Science,” associating the term “taboo” with the taxa “amphibians,” “birds,” “mammals,” “fish” and “reptiles.” From this search, 3959 titles were found related to the key terms of the research. After the entire screening process carried out by paired reviewers, only 25 articles were included in the search. RESULTS: It was identified that 100 species of animals are related to some type of taboo, and segmental taboos and specific taboos were predominant, with 93 and 31 citations, respectively. In addition, the taxon with the most taboos recorded was fish, followed by mammals. Our findings indicate that the taboo protects 99% of the animal species mentioned, being a crucial tool for the conservation of these species. CONCLUSIONS: The present study covered the status of current knowledge about food taboos associated with wildlife in the world. It is noticeable that taboos have a considerable effect on animal conservation, as the social restrictions imposed by taboos effectively contribute to the local conservation of species. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13002-023-00600-9. BioMed Central 2023-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10349426/ /pubmed/37454092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-023-00600-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Landim, André Santos
de Menezes Souza, Jeferson
dos Santos, Lucrécia Braz
de Freitas Lins-Neto, Ernani Machado
da Silva, Daniel Tenório
Ferreira, Felipe Silva
Food taboos and animal conservation: a systematic review on how cultural expressions influence interaction with wildlife species
title Food taboos and animal conservation: a systematic review on how cultural expressions influence interaction with wildlife species
title_full Food taboos and animal conservation: a systematic review on how cultural expressions influence interaction with wildlife species
title_fullStr Food taboos and animal conservation: a systematic review on how cultural expressions influence interaction with wildlife species
title_full_unstemmed Food taboos and animal conservation: a systematic review on how cultural expressions influence interaction with wildlife species
title_short Food taboos and animal conservation: a systematic review on how cultural expressions influence interaction with wildlife species
title_sort food taboos and animal conservation: a systematic review on how cultural expressions influence interaction with wildlife species
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37454092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-023-00600-9
work_keys_str_mv AT landimandresantos foodtaboosandanimalconservationasystematicreviewonhowculturalexpressionsinfluenceinteractionwithwildlifespecies
AT demenezessouzajeferson foodtaboosandanimalconservationasystematicreviewonhowculturalexpressionsinfluenceinteractionwithwildlifespecies
AT dossantoslucreciabraz foodtaboosandanimalconservationasystematicreviewonhowculturalexpressionsinfluenceinteractionwithwildlifespecies
AT defreitaslinsnetoernanimachado foodtaboosandanimalconservationasystematicreviewonhowculturalexpressionsinfluenceinteractionwithwildlifespecies
AT dasilvadanieltenorio foodtaboosandanimalconservationasystematicreviewonhowculturalexpressionsinfluenceinteractionwithwildlifespecies
AT ferreirafelipesilva foodtaboosandanimalconservationasystematicreviewonhowculturalexpressionsinfluenceinteractionwithwildlifespecies