Cargando…
Food taboos and animal conservation: a systematic review on how cultural expressions influence interaction with wildlife species
BACKGROUND: Human societies have food taboos as social rules that restrict access to a particular animal. Taboos are pointed out as tools for the conservation of animals, considering that the presence of this social rule prevents the consumption of animals. This work consists of a systematic review...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37454092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-023-00600-9 |
_version_ | 1785073902704132096 |
---|---|
author | Landim, André Santos de Menezes Souza, Jeferson dos Santos, Lucrécia Braz de Freitas Lins-Neto, Ernani Machado da Silva, Daniel Tenório Ferreira, Felipe Silva |
author_facet | Landim, André Santos de Menezes Souza, Jeferson dos Santos, Lucrécia Braz de Freitas Lins-Neto, Ernani Machado da Silva, Daniel Tenório Ferreira, Felipe Silva |
author_sort | Landim, André Santos |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Human societies have food taboos as social rules that restrict access to a particular animal. Taboos are pointed out as tools for the conservation of animals, considering that the presence of this social rule prevents the consumption of animals. This work consists of a systematic review that aimed to verify how food taboos vary between different animal species, and how this relationship has influenced their conservation. METHODS: For this systematic review, the search for articles by keywords took place in the databases “Science Direct,” Scopus,” “SciELo” and “Web of Science,” associating the term “taboo” with the taxa “amphibians,” “birds,” “mammals,” “fish” and “reptiles.” From this search, 3959 titles were found related to the key terms of the research. After the entire screening process carried out by paired reviewers, only 25 articles were included in the search. RESULTS: It was identified that 100 species of animals are related to some type of taboo, and segmental taboos and specific taboos were predominant, with 93 and 31 citations, respectively. In addition, the taxon with the most taboos recorded was fish, followed by mammals. Our findings indicate that the taboo protects 99% of the animal species mentioned, being a crucial tool for the conservation of these species. CONCLUSIONS: The present study covered the status of current knowledge about food taboos associated with wildlife in the world. It is noticeable that taboos have a considerable effect on animal conservation, as the social restrictions imposed by taboos effectively contribute to the local conservation of species. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13002-023-00600-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10349426 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103494262023-07-16 Food taboos and animal conservation: a systematic review on how cultural expressions influence interaction with wildlife species Landim, André Santos de Menezes Souza, Jeferson dos Santos, Lucrécia Braz de Freitas Lins-Neto, Ernani Machado da Silva, Daniel Tenório Ferreira, Felipe Silva J Ethnobiol Ethnomed Review BACKGROUND: Human societies have food taboos as social rules that restrict access to a particular animal. Taboos are pointed out as tools for the conservation of animals, considering that the presence of this social rule prevents the consumption of animals. This work consists of a systematic review that aimed to verify how food taboos vary between different animal species, and how this relationship has influenced their conservation. METHODS: For this systematic review, the search for articles by keywords took place in the databases “Science Direct,” Scopus,” “SciELo” and “Web of Science,” associating the term “taboo” with the taxa “amphibians,” “birds,” “mammals,” “fish” and “reptiles.” From this search, 3959 titles were found related to the key terms of the research. After the entire screening process carried out by paired reviewers, only 25 articles were included in the search. RESULTS: It was identified that 100 species of animals are related to some type of taboo, and segmental taboos and specific taboos were predominant, with 93 and 31 citations, respectively. In addition, the taxon with the most taboos recorded was fish, followed by mammals. Our findings indicate that the taboo protects 99% of the animal species mentioned, being a crucial tool for the conservation of these species. CONCLUSIONS: The present study covered the status of current knowledge about food taboos associated with wildlife in the world. It is noticeable that taboos have a considerable effect on animal conservation, as the social restrictions imposed by taboos effectively contribute to the local conservation of species. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13002-023-00600-9. BioMed Central 2023-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10349426/ /pubmed/37454092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-023-00600-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Landim, André Santos de Menezes Souza, Jeferson dos Santos, Lucrécia Braz de Freitas Lins-Neto, Ernani Machado da Silva, Daniel Tenório Ferreira, Felipe Silva Food taboos and animal conservation: a systematic review on how cultural expressions influence interaction with wildlife species |
title | Food taboos and animal conservation: a systematic review on how cultural expressions influence interaction with wildlife species |
title_full | Food taboos and animal conservation: a systematic review on how cultural expressions influence interaction with wildlife species |
title_fullStr | Food taboos and animal conservation: a systematic review on how cultural expressions influence interaction with wildlife species |
title_full_unstemmed | Food taboos and animal conservation: a systematic review on how cultural expressions influence interaction with wildlife species |
title_short | Food taboos and animal conservation: a systematic review on how cultural expressions influence interaction with wildlife species |
title_sort | food taboos and animal conservation: a systematic review on how cultural expressions influence interaction with wildlife species |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37454092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-023-00600-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT landimandresantos foodtaboosandanimalconservationasystematicreviewonhowculturalexpressionsinfluenceinteractionwithwildlifespecies AT demenezessouzajeferson foodtaboosandanimalconservationasystematicreviewonhowculturalexpressionsinfluenceinteractionwithwildlifespecies AT dossantoslucreciabraz foodtaboosandanimalconservationasystematicreviewonhowculturalexpressionsinfluenceinteractionwithwildlifespecies AT defreitaslinsnetoernanimachado foodtaboosandanimalconservationasystematicreviewonhowculturalexpressionsinfluenceinteractionwithwildlifespecies AT dasilvadanieltenorio foodtaboosandanimalconservationasystematicreviewonhowculturalexpressionsinfluenceinteractionwithwildlifespecies AT ferreirafelipesilva foodtaboosandanimalconservationasystematicreviewonhowculturalexpressionsinfluenceinteractionwithwildlifespecies |