Cargando…

Efficacy of probiotics in pediatric atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a prevailing skin disease in childhood. Several studies have appraised probiotics as a strategy for treating AD. We aimed to assess the validity of probiotics in the treatment of AD in children. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Sco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xue, Xiali, Yang, Xinwei, Shi, Xiubo, Deng, Zhongyi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37488736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clt2.12283
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a prevailing skin disease in childhood. Several studies have appraised probiotics as a strategy for treating AD. We aimed to assess the validity of probiotics in the treatment of AD in children. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, EBSCO, Web of Science and Cochrane library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effect of probiotic treatment on SCORAD value in pediatric patients with AD compared with a placebo group between 1 January 2010 and 1 January 2023. The risk of bias and the certainty of evidence were assessed using Cochrane ROB 2.0. RESULTS: A total of 10 outcomes from 9 RCTs involving 1000 patients were included. Three of these outcomes were analyzed as dichotomous variables in 373 patients. The other seven were analyzed for continuous variables in 627 patients. A meta‐analysis of the random‐effect model of the dichotomous variables demonstrated no significant difference between the probiotic and control groups [OR = 1.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.70, 4.35), p = 0.23, I (2) = 68%]. A meta‐analysis of the random‐effect model of continuous variables demonstrated significant differences between the probiotic and control groups [MD = −4.24, 95% CI (−7.78, −0.71), p = 0.002, I (2) = 71%]. Subgroup analysis of continuous variables showed that the effects of children's age, treatment duration and probiotic species on the SCORAD value were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Evidence on the improvement effect of probiotics on pediatric patients with AD is limited. This study showed that single‐strain probiotic treatment exerts a positive effect on AD. Restricted to the quantity and quality of incorporated studies, these conclusions have yet to be validated by high‐quality studies.