Cargando…

Regional Anesthetic Use in Trans-Hiatal Esophagectomy. Are They Worth Consideration? A Case Series

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy traditionally has high levels of perioperative morbidity and mortality due to surgical techniques and case complexity. While thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is considered first-line for postoperative analgesia after esophagectomy, complications can arise related to its sy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mitchell, William, Roser, Thomas, Heard, Jessica, Logarajah, Shankar, Ok, John, Jay, John, Osman, Houssam, Jeyarajah, D Rohan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37456592
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S398331
_version_ 1785073951003639808
author Mitchell, William
Roser, Thomas
Heard, Jessica
Logarajah, Shankar
Ok, John
Jay, John
Osman, Houssam
Jeyarajah, D Rohan
author_facet Mitchell, William
Roser, Thomas
Heard, Jessica
Logarajah, Shankar
Ok, John
Jay, John
Osman, Houssam
Jeyarajah, D Rohan
author_sort Mitchell, William
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy traditionally has high levels of perioperative morbidity and mortality due to surgical techniques and case complexity. While thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is considered first-line for postoperative analgesia after esophagectomy, complications can arise related to its sympathectomy and mobility impairment. Additionally, it has been shown that postoperative outcomes are improved with early extubation following esophagectomy. Our aim is to describe the impact of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks on extubation rates following esophagectomy when uncoupled from TEA. METHODS: This is a case series of 42 patients who underwent trans-hiatal esophagectomy between 2019 and 2022 who received a TAP block without TEA. The primary outcomes of interest were the rates of extubation within the operating room (OR) and reintubation. Secondary outcomes included: intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS), opioid pain medication use, post-operative hypotension, fluid administration, postoperative pain scores, development of anastomotic leak, and 30-day readmission. RESULTS: The mean age at operation was 63 years and 97.6% of patients were represented by American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) physical status class III or IV. Thirty-four (81%) patients immediately extubated postoperatively. Nine patients (21.4%) underwent reintubation during their hospital course. Only seven patients (16.7%) required vasopressors postoperatively. The median LOS was five days in the ICU and 10 days in the hospital. TAP block alone was found to be equivalent to TAP with additional regional blocks (TAP+) on the basis of immediate extubation, reintubation, ICU and hospital LOS, and reported postoperative pain. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrated immediate extubation is possible using TAP blocks while limiting post-operative hypotension and fluid administration. This was shown despite the elevated comorbidity burden of this study’s population. Overall, this study supports the use of TAP blocks as a possible alternative for primary analgesia in patients undergoing trans-hiatal esophagectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study includes participants who were retrospectively registered. IRB# 037.HPB.2018.R.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10349603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103496032023-07-16 Regional Anesthetic Use in Trans-Hiatal Esophagectomy. Are They Worth Consideration? A Case Series Mitchell, William Roser, Thomas Heard, Jessica Logarajah, Shankar Ok, John Jay, John Osman, Houssam Jeyarajah, D Rohan Local Reg Anesth Original Research BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy traditionally has high levels of perioperative morbidity and mortality due to surgical techniques and case complexity. While thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is considered first-line for postoperative analgesia after esophagectomy, complications can arise related to its sympathectomy and mobility impairment. Additionally, it has been shown that postoperative outcomes are improved with early extubation following esophagectomy. Our aim is to describe the impact of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks on extubation rates following esophagectomy when uncoupled from TEA. METHODS: This is a case series of 42 patients who underwent trans-hiatal esophagectomy between 2019 and 2022 who received a TAP block without TEA. The primary outcomes of interest were the rates of extubation within the operating room (OR) and reintubation. Secondary outcomes included: intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS), opioid pain medication use, post-operative hypotension, fluid administration, postoperative pain scores, development of anastomotic leak, and 30-day readmission. RESULTS: The mean age at operation was 63 years and 97.6% of patients were represented by American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) physical status class III or IV. Thirty-four (81%) patients immediately extubated postoperatively. Nine patients (21.4%) underwent reintubation during their hospital course. Only seven patients (16.7%) required vasopressors postoperatively. The median LOS was five days in the ICU and 10 days in the hospital. TAP block alone was found to be equivalent to TAP with additional regional blocks (TAP+) on the basis of immediate extubation, reintubation, ICU and hospital LOS, and reported postoperative pain. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrated immediate extubation is possible using TAP blocks while limiting post-operative hypotension and fluid administration. This was shown despite the elevated comorbidity burden of this study’s population. Overall, this study supports the use of TAP blocks as a possible alternative for primary analgesia in patients undergoing trans-hiatal esophagectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study includes participants who were retrospectively registered. IRB# 037.HPB.2018.R. Dove 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10349603/ /pubmed/37456592 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S398331 Text en © 2023 Mitchell et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Mitchell, William
Roser, Thomas
Heard, Jessica
Logarajah, Shankar
Ok, John
Jay, John
Osman, Houssam
Jeyarajah, D Rohan
Regional Anesthetic Use in Trans-Hiatal Esophagectomy. Are They Worth Consideration? A Case Series
title Regional Anesthetic Use in Trans-Hiatal Esophagectomy. Are They Worth Consideration? A Case Series
title_full Regional Anesthetic Use in Trans-Hiatal Esophagectomy. Are They Worth Consideration? A Case Series
title_fullStr Regional Anesthetic Use in Trans-Hiatal Esophagectomy. Are They Worth Consideration? A Case Series
title_full_unstemmed Regional Anesthetic Use in Trans-Hiatal Esophagectomy. Are They Worth Consideration? A Case Series
title_short Regional Anesthetic Use in Trans-Hiatal Esophagectomy. Are They Worth Consideration? A Case Series
title_sort regional anesthetic use in trans-hiatal esophagectomy. are they worth consideration? a case series
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37456592
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S398331
work_keys_str_mv AT mitchellwilliam regionalanestheticuseintranshiatalesophagectomyaretheyworthconsiderationacaseseries
AT roserthomas regionalanestheticuseintranshiatalesophagectomyaretheyworthconsiderationacaseseries
AT heardjessica regionalanestheticuseintranshiatalesophagectomyaretheyworthconsiderationacaseseries
AT logarajahshankar regionalanestheticuseintranshiatalesophagectomyaretheyworthconsiderationacaseseries
AT okjohn regionalanestheticuseintranshiatalesophagectomyaretheyworthconsiderationacaseseries
AT jayjohn regionalanestheticuseintranshiatalesophagectomyaretheyworthconsiderationacaseseries
AT osmanhoussam regionalanestheticuseintranshiatalesophagectomyaretheyworthconsiderationacaseseries
AT jeyarajahdrohan regionalanestheticuseintranshiatalesophagectomyaretheyworthconsiderationacaseseries