Cargando…

Maintenance therapy improves the survival outcomes of patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma responding to first-line chemotherapy: a multicentre, randomized controlled clinical study

PURPOSE: To explore the safety and role of tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S1) maintenance therapy (MT) in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients after response to first-line chemotherapy and to assess outcome-associated biomarkers. METHODS: This was a multicentre, open-label, randomized con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Ying, Huang, Haixin, Yang, Hui, Hu, Xiaohua, Liu, Meilian, Huang, Changjie, Feng, Xianbin, Chen, Xishan, Jiang, Zhou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36075994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04341-2
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To explore the safety and role of tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S1) maintenance therapy (MT) in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients after response to first-line chemotherapy and to assess outcome-associated biomarkers. METHODS: This was a multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled study involving metastatic NPC patients recruited (from May 2015 to May 2019) at five hospitals in China. The participants were randomized to S1-MT (receiving S1 MT until disease progression or intolerance) or non-MT (followed up until disease progression) groups. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were the overall survival (OS), the correlation between EBV-DNA, serum amyloid A (SAA) status, and outcomes after the first-line chemotherapy, and safety. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 24.3 months; 88 and 95 participants were evaluable in the S1-MT and non-MT groups, respectively. Compared with non-MT, S1-MT prolonged PFS (16.9 vs. 9.3 months, P < 0.001) and OS (33.6 vs. 20.6 months, P < 0.001). Regardless of their EBV-DNA status after first-line chemotherapy, participants were able to benefit from S1 MT, but EBV-DNA-positive participants benefited more significantly (PFS: HR = 0.600, 95% CI = 0.373–0.965, P = 0.035; OS: HR = 0.393, 95% CI = 0.227–0.681, P = 0.001). MT only improved PFS and OS in patients with an SAA decline after first-line chemotherapy (PFS: HR = 0.570, 95% CI = 0.350–0.919, P = 0.021; OS: HR = 0.404, 95% CI = 0.230–0.709, P = 0.002). The median S1 treatment was 23 cycles. Grade 1–2 skin pigmentation, oral mucositis, and hand and foot syndrome were the main adverse reactions. CONCLUSION: For metastatic NPC patients with first-line chemotherapy response, S1 MT can improve PFS and OS, with good tolerability. EBV-DNA and SAA can better help us identify patients who can benefit from MT after standard treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-IOR-16007939). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-022-04341-2.