Cargando…
A perceptual field test in object experts using gaze-contingent eye tracking
A hallmark of expert object recognition is rapid and accurate subordinate-category recognition of visually homogenous objects. However, the perceptual strategies by which expert recognition is achieved is less known. The current study investigated whether visual expertise changes observers’ perceptu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37454134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37695-9 |
_version_ | 1785074011067121664 |
---|---|
author | Hagen, Simen Vuong, Quoc C. Jung, Liandra Chin, Michael D. Scott, Lisa S. Tanaka, James W. |
author_facet | Hagen, Simen Vuong, Quoc C. Jung, Liandra Chin, Michael D. Scott, Lisa S. Tanaka, James W. |
author_sort | Hagen, Simen |
collection | PubMed |
description | A hallmark of expert object recognition is rapid and accurate subordinate-category recognition of visually homogenous objects. However, the perceptual strategies by which expert recognition is achieved is less known. The current study investigated whether visual expertise changes observers’ perceptual field (e.g., their ability to use information away from fixation for recognition) for objects in their domain of expertise, using a gaze-contingent eye-tracking paradigm. In the current study, bird experts and novices were presented with two bird images sequentially, and their task was to determine whether the two images were of the same species (e.g., two different song sparrows) or different species (e.g., song sparrow and chipping sparrow). The first study bird image was presented in full view. The second test bird image was presented fully visible (full-view), restricted to a circular window centered on gaze position (central-view), or restricted to image regions beyond a circular mask centered on gaze position (peripheral-view). While experts and novices did not differ in their eye-movement behavior, experts’ performance on the discrimination task for the fastest responses was less impaired than novices in the peripheral-view condition. Thus, the experts used peripheral information to a greater extent than novices, indicating that the experts have a wider perceptual field to support their speeded subordinate recognition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10349839 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103498392023-07-17 A perceptual field test in object experts using gaze-contingent eye tracking Hagen, Simen Vuong, Quoc C. Jung, Liandra Chin, Michael D. Scott, Lisa S. Tanaka, James W. Sci Rep Article A hallmark of expert object recognition is rapid and accurate subordinate-category recognition of visually homogenous objects. However, the perceptual strategies by which expert recognition is achieved is less known. The current study investigated whether visual expertise changes observers’ perceptual field (e.g., their ability to use information away from fixation for recognition) for objects in their domain of expertise, using a gaze-contingent eye-tracking paradigm. In the current study, bird experts and novices were presented with two bird images sequentially, and their task was to determine whether the two images were of the same species (e.g., two different song sparrows) or different species (e.g., song sparrow and chipping sparrow). The first study bird image was presented in full view. The second test bird image was presented fully visible (full-view), restricted to a circular window centered on gaze position (central-view), or restricted to image regions beyond a circular mask centered on gaze position (peripheral-view). While experts and novices did not differ in their eye-movement behavior, experts’ performance on the discrimination task for the fastest responses was less impaired than novices in the peripheral-view condition. Thus, the experts used peripheral information to a greater extent than novices, indicating that the experts have a wider perceptual field to support their speeded subordinate recognition. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10349839/ /pubmed/37454134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37695-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Hagen, Simen Vuong, Quoc C. Jung, Liandra Chin, Michael D. Scott, Lisa S. Tanaka, James W. A perceptual field test in object experts using gaze-contingent eye tracking |
title | A perceptual field test in object experts using gaze-contingent eye tracking |
title_full | A perceptual field test in object experts using gaze-contingent eye tracking |
title_fullStr | A perceptual field test in object experts using gaze-contingent eye tracking |
title_full_unstemmed | A perceptual field test in object experts using gaze-contingent eye tracking |
title_short | A perceptual field test in object experts using gaze-contingent eye tracking |
title_sort | perceptual field test in object experts using gaze-contingent eye tracking |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37454134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37695-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hagensimen aperceptualfieldtestinobjectexpertsusinggazecontingenteyetracking AT vuongquocc aperceptualfieldtestinobjectexpertsusinggazecontingenteyetracking AT jungliandra aperceptualfieldtestinobjectexpertsusinggazecontingenteyetracking AT chinmichaeld aperceptualfieldtestinobjectexpertsusinggazecontingenteyetracking AT scottlisas aperceptualfieldtestinobjectexpertsusinggazecontingenteyetracking AT tanakajamesw aperceptualfieldtestinobjectexpertsusinggazecontingenteyetracking AT hagensimen perceptualfieldtestinobjectexpertsusinggazecontingenteyetracking AT vuongquocc perceptualfieldtestinobjectexpertsusinggazecontingenteyetracking AT jungliandra perceptualfieldtestinobjectexpertsusinggazecontingenteyetracking AT chinmichaeld perceptualfieldtestinobjectexpertsusinggazecontingenteyetracking AT scottlisas perceptualfieldtestinobjectexpertsusinggazecontingenteyetracking AT tanakajamesw perceptualfieldtestinobjectexpertsusinggazecontingenteyetracking |