Cargando…

The role of genetically distinct central amygdala neurons in appetitive and aversive responding assayed with a novel dual valence operant conditioning paradigm

To survive, animals must meet their biological needs while simultaneously avoiding danger. However, the neurobiological basis of appetitive and aversive survival behaviors has historically been studied using separate behavioral tasks. While recent studies in mice have quantified appetitive and avers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dorofeikova, Mariia, Stelly, Claire E., Duong, Anh, Basavanhalli, Samhita, Bean, Erin, Weissmuller, Katherine, Sifnugel, Natalia, Resendez, Alexis, Corey, David M., Tasker, Jeffrey G., Fadok, Jonathan P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37461627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.07.547979
_version_ 1785074053011210240
author Dorofeikova, Mariia
Stelly, Claire E.
Duong, Anh
Basavanhalli, Samhita
Bean, Erin
Weissmuller, Katherine
Sifnugel, Natalia
Resendez, Alexis
Corey, David M.
Tasker, Jeffrey G.
Fadok, Jonathan P.
author_facet Dorofeikova, Mariia
Stelly, Claire E.
Duong, Anh
Basavanhalli, Samhita
Bean, Erin
Weissmuller, Katherine
Sifnugel, Natalia
Resendez, Alexis
Corey, David M.
Tasker, Jeffrey G.
Fadok, Jonathan P.
author_sort Dorofeikova, Mariia
collection PubMed
description To survive, animals must meet their biological needs while simultaneously avoiding danger. However, the neurobiological basis of appetitive and aversive survival behaviors has historically been studied using separate behavioral tasks. While recent studies in mice have quantified appetitive and aversive conditioned responses simultaneously (Heinz et al., 2017; Jikomes et al., 2016), these tasks required different behavioral responses to each stimulus. As many brain regions involved in survival behavior process stimuli of opposite valence, we developed a paradigm in which mice perform the same response (nosepoke) to distinct auditory cues to obtain a rewarding outcome (palatable food) or avoid an aversive outcome (mild footshoock). This design allows for both within- and between-subject comparisons as animals respond to appetitive and aversive cues. The central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) is implicated in the regulation of responses to stimuli of either valence. Considering its role in threat processing (Haubensak et al., 2010; Wilensky et al., 2006) and regulation of incentive salience (Warlow and Berridge, 2021), it is important to examine the contribution of the CeA to mechanisms potentially underlying comorbid dysregulation of avoidance and reward (Bolton et al., 2009; Sinha, 2008). Using this paradigm, we tested the role of two molecularly defined CeA subtypes previously linked to consummatory and defensive behaviors. Significant strain differences in the acquisition and performance of the task were observed. Bidirectional chemogenetic manipulation of CeA somatostatin (SOM) neurons altered motivation for reward and perseveration of reward-seeking responses on avoidance trials. Manipulation of corticotropin-releasing factor neurons (CRF) had no significant effect on food reward consumption, motivation, or task performance. This paradigm will facilitate investigations into the neuronal mechanisms controlling motivated behavior across valences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10350072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103500722023-07-17 The role of genetically distinct central amygdala neurons in appetitive and aversive responding assayed with a novel dual valence operant conditioning paradigm Dorofeikova, Mariia Stelly, Claire E. Duong, Anh Basavanhalli, Samhita Bean, Erin Weissmuller, Katherine Sifnugel, Natalia Resendez, Alexis Corey, David M. Tasker, Jeffrey G. Fadok, Jonathan P. bioRxiv Article To survive, animals must meet their biological needs while simultaneously avoiding danger. However, the neurobiological basis of appetitive and aversive survival behaviors has historically been studied using separate behavioral tasks. While recent studies in mice have quantified appetitive and aversive conditioned responses simultaneously (Heinz et al., 2017; Jikomes et al., 2016), these tasks required different behavioral responses to each stimulus. As many brain regions involved in survival behavior process stimuli of opposite valence, we developed a paradigm in which mice perform the same response (nosepoke) to distinct auditory cues to obtain a rewarding outcome (palatable food) or avoid an aversive outcome (mild footshoock). This design allows for both within- and between-subject comparisons as animals respond to appetitive and aversive cues. The central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) is implicated in the regulation of responses to stimuli of either valence. Considering its role in threat processing (Haubensak et al., 2010; Wilensky et al., 2006) and regulation of incentive salience (Warlow and Berridge, 2021), it is important to examine the contribution of the CeA to mechanisms potentially underlying comorbid dysregulation of avoidance and reward (Bolton et al., 2009; Sinha, 2008). Using this paradigm, we tested the role of two molecularly defined CeA subtypes previously linked to consummatory and defensive behaviors. Significant strain differences in the acquisition and performance of the task were observed. Bidirectional chemogenetic manipulation of CeA somatostatin (SOM) neurons altered motivation for reward and perseveration of reward-seeking responses on avoidance trials. Manipulation of corticotropin-releasing factor neurons (CRF) had no significant effect on food reward consumption, motivation, or task performance. This paradigm will facilitate investigations into the neuronal mechanisms controlling motivated behavior across valences. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10350072/ /pubmed/37461627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.07.547979 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
spellingShingle Article
Dorofeikova, Mariia
Stelly, Claire E.
Duong, Anh
Basavanhalli, Samhita
Bean, Erin
Weissmuller, Katherine
Sifnugel, Natalia
Resendez, Alexis
Corey, David M.
Tasker, Jeffrey G.
Fadok, Jonathan P.
The role of genetically distinct central amygdala neurons in appetitive and aversive responding assayed with a novel dual valence operant conditioning paradigm
title The role of genetically distinct central amygdala neurons in appetitive and aversive responding assayed with a novel dual valence operant conditioning paradigm
title_full The role of genetically distinct central amygdala neurons in appetitive and aversive responding assayed with a novel dual valence operant conditioning paradigm
title_fullStr The role of genetically distinct central amygdala neurons in appetitive and aversive responding assayed with a novel dual valence operant conditioning paradigm
title_full_unstemmed The role of genetically distinct central amygdala neurons in appetitive and aversive responding assayed with a novel dual valence operant conditioning paradigm
title_short The role of genetically distinct central amygdala neurons in appetitive and aversive responding assayed with a novel dual valence operant conditioning paradigm
title_sort role of genetically distinct central amygdala neurons in appetitive and aversive responding assayed with a novel dual valence operant conditioning paradigm
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37461627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.07.547979
work_keys_str_mv AT dorofeikovamariia theroleofgeneticallydistinctcentralamygdalaneuronsinappetitiveandaversiverespondingassayedwithanoveldualvalenceoperantconditioningparadigm
AT stellyclairee theroleofgeneticallydistinctcentralamygdalaneuronsinappetitiveandaversiverespondingassayedwithanoveldualvalenceoperantconditioningparadigm
AT duonganh theroleofgeneticallydistinctcentralamygdalaneuronsinappetitiveandaversiverespondingassayedwithanoveldualvalenceoperantconditioningparadigm
AT basavanhallisamhita theroleofgeneticallydistinctcentralamygdalaneuronsinappetitiveandaversiverespondingassayedwithanoveldualvalenceoperantconditioningparadigm
AT beanerin theroleofgeneticallydistinctcentralamygdalaneuronsinappetitiveandaversiverespondingassayedwithanoveldualvalenceoperantconditioningparadigm
AT weissmullerkatherine theroleofgeneticallydistinctcentralamygdalaneuronsinappetitiveandaversiverespondingassayedwithanoveldualvalenceoperantconditioningparadigm
AT sifnugelnatalia theroleofgeneticallydistinctcentralamygdalaneuronsinappetitiveandaversiverespondingassayedwithanoveldualvalenceoperantconditioningparadigm
AT resendezalexis theroleofgeneticallydistinctcentralamygdalaneuronsinappetitiveandaversiverespondingassayedwithanoveldualvalenceoperantconditioningparadigm
AT coreydavidm theroleofgeneticallydistinctcentralamygdalaneuronsinappetitiveandaversiverespondingassayedwithanoveldualvalenceoperantconditioningparadigm
AT taskerjeffreyg theroleofgeneticallydistinctcentralamygdalaneuronsinappetitiveandaversiverespondingassayedwithanoveldualvalenceoperantconditioningparadigm
AT fadokjonathanp theroleofgeneticallydistinctcentralamygdalaneuronsinappetitiveandaversiverespondingassayedwithanoveldualvalenceoperantconditioningparadigm
AT dorofeikovamariia roleofgeneticallydistinctcentralamygdalaneuronsinappetitiveandaversiverespondingassayedwithanoveldualvalenceoperantconditioningparadigm
AT stellyclairee roleofgeneticallydistinctcentralamygdalaneuronsinappetitiveandaversiverespondingassayedwithanoveldualvalenceoperantconditioningparadigm
AT duonganh roleofgeneticallydistinctcentralamygdalaneuronsinappetitiveandaversiverespondingassayedwithanoveldualvalenceoperantconditioningparadigm
AT basavanhallisamhita roleofgeneticallydistinctcentralamygdalaneuronsinappetitiveandaversiverespondingassayedwithanoveldualvalenceoperantconditioningparadigm
AT beanerin roleofgeneticallydistinctcentralamygdalaneuronsinappetitiveandaversiverespondingassayedwithanoveldualvalenceoperantconditioningparadigm
AT weissmullerkatherine roleofgeneticallydistinctcentralamygdalaneuronsinappetitiveandaversiverespondingassayedwithanoveldualvalenceoperantconditioningparadigm
AT sifnugelnatalia roleofgeneticallydistinctcentralamygdalaneuronsinappetitiveandaversiverespondingassayedwithanoveldualvalenceoperantconditioningparadigm
AT resendezalexis roleofgeneticallydistinctcentralamygdalaneuronsinappetitiveandaversiverespondingassayedwithanoveldualvalenceoperantconditioningparadigm
AT coreydavidm roleofgeneticallydistinctcentralamygdalaneuronsinappetitiveandaversiverespondingassayedwithanoveldualvalenceoperantconditioningparadigm
AT taskerjeffreyg roleofgeneticallydistinctcentralamygdalaneuronsinappetitiveandaversiverespondingassayedwithanoveldualvalenceoperantconditioningparadigm
AT fadokjonathanp roleofgeneticallydistinctcentralamygdalaneuronsinappetitiveandaversiverespondingassayedwithanoveldualvalenceoperantconditioningparadigm