Cargando…

Quantifying Associations Between Child Health and Neighborhood Social Vulnerability: Does the Choice of Index Matter?

IMPORTANCE: Policymakers have increasingly utilized place-based social disadvantage indices to quantify the impacts of place on health and inform equitable resource allocation. Indices vary in design, content, and purpose but are often used interchangeably, potentially resulting in differential assi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zolotor, Anna, Huang, Ro W., Bhavsar, Nrupen A., Cholera, Rushina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37461577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.20.23291679
_version_ 1785074067785646080
author Zolotor, Anna
Huang, Ro W.
Bhavsar, Nrupen A.
Cholera, Rushina
author_facet Zolotor, Anna
Huang, Ro W.
Bhavsar, Nrupen A.
Cholera, Rushina
author_sort Zolotor, Anna
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Policymakers have increasingly utilized place-based social disadvantage indices to quantify the impacts of place on health and inform equitable resource allocation. Indices vary in design, content, and purpose but are often used interchangeably, potentially resulting in differential assignments of relative disadvantage depending on index choice. OBJECTIVE: To compare associations between three commonly used disadvantage indices (Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), Area Deprivation Index (ADI), and Child Opportunity Index (COI)) and two epidemiologically distinct child health outcomes—infant well-child check (WCC) attendance and adolescent obesity. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of Duke University Health System electronic health record (EHR) data from January 2014 to December 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Children ≤18 years of age with outpatient encounters between January 2014 and December 2019, and who were Durham County residents were eligible. WCC attendance was assessed for infants ages 0-15 months; obesity was assessed for children ages 11-17 years. EXPOSURES: 2014 Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), 2015 Area Deprivation Index (ADI), and 2015 Child Opportunity Index (COI) 2.0. MAIN OUTCOMES: 1) Infant WCC attendance: attending less than the minimum recommended six WCCs in the first 15 months of life, and 2) Adolescent obesity: BMI ≥ the 95th percentile at both the most recent encounter and an encounter within the prior 9-36 months. RESULTS: Of 10175 patients in the WCC cohort, 20% (n = 2073) had less than six WCCs. Of 14961 patients in the obesity cohort, 20% (n = 2933) had obesity. All three indices were associated with both WCCs (OR for SVI 1.10, 95% CI 1.08-1.12; OR for ADI 1.10, 95% CI 1.08-1.12; OR for COI 1.12, 95% CI 1.10-1.14) and obesity (OR for SVI 1.05, 95% CI 1.04-1.08; OR for ADI 1.08, 95% CI 1.06-1.10; OR for COI 1.07, 95% CI 1.05-1.08). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Higher social disadvantage as defined by all three indices was similarly associated with both adolescent obesity and decreased infant WCC attendance. While the COI incorporates a broader set of child-specific variables, the SVI and ADI may often be just as suitable for pediatric research. Users should consider population and outcome characteristics when selecting an index.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10350141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103501412023-07-17 Quantifying Associations Between Child Health and Neighborhood Social Vulnerability: Does the Choice of Index Matter? Zolotor, Anna Huang, Ro W. Bhavsar, Nrupen A. Cholera, Rushina medRxiv Article IMPORTANCE: Policymakers have increasingly utilized place-based social disadvantage indices to quantify the impacts of place on health and inform equitable resource allocation. Indices vary in design, content, and purpose but are often used interchangeably, potentially resulting in differential assignments of relative disadvantage depending on index choice. OBJECTIVE: To compare associations between three commonly used disadvantage indices (Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), Area Deprivation Index (ADI), and Child Opportunity Index (COI)) and two epidemiologically distinct child health outcomes—infant well-child check (WCC) attendance and adolescent obesity. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of Duke University Health System electronic health record (EHR) data from January 2014 to December 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Children ≤18 years of age with outpatient encounters between January 2014 and December 2019, and who were Durham County residents were eligible. WCC attendance was assessed for infants ages 0-15 months; obesity was assessed for children ages 11-17 years. EXPOSURES: 2014 Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), 2015 Area Deprivation Index (ADI), and 2015 Child Opportunity Index (COI) 2.0. MAIN OUTCOMES: 1) Infant WCC attendance: attending less than the minimum recommended six WCCs in the first 15 months of life, and 2) Adolescent obesity: BMI ≥ the 95th percentile at both the most recent encounter and an encounter within the prior 9-36 months. RESULTS: Of 10175 patients in the WCC cohort, 20% (n = 2073) had less than six WCCs. Of 14961 patients in the obesity cohort, 20% (n = 2933) had obesity. All three indices were associated with both WCCs (OR for SVI 1.10, 95% CI 1.08-1.12; OR for ADI 1.10, 95% CI 1.08-1.12; OR for COI 1.12, 95% CI 1.10-1.14) and obesity (OR for SVI 1.05, 95% CI 1.04-1.08; OR for ADI 1.08, 95% CI 1.06-1.10; OR for COI 1.07, 95% CI 1.05-1.08). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Higher social disadvantage as defined by all three indices was similarly associated with both adolescent obesity and decreased infant WCC attendance. While the COI incorporates a broader set of child-specific variables, the SVI and ADI may often be just as suitable for pediatric research. Users should consider population and outcome characteristics when selecting an index. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10350141/ /pubmed/37461577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.20.23291679 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
spellingShingle Article
Zolotor, Anna
Huang, Ro W.
Bhavsar, Nrupen A.
Cholera, Rushina
Quantifying Associations Between Child Health and Neighborhood Social Vulnerability: Does the Choice of Index Matter?
title Quantifying Associations Between Child Health and Neighborhood Social Vulnerability: Does the Choice of Index Matter?
title_full Quantifying Associations Between Child Health and Neighborhood Social Vulnerability: Does the Choice of Index Matter?
title_fullStr Quantifying Associations Between Child Health and Neighborhood Social Vulnerability: Does the Choice of Index Matter?
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying Associations Between Child Health and Neighborhood Social Vulnerability: Does the Choice of Index Matter?
title_short Quantifying Associations Between Child Health and Neighborhood Social Vulnerability: Does the Choice of Index Matter?
title_sort quantifying associations between child health and neighborhood social vulnerability: does the choice of index matter?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37461577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.20.23291679
work_keys_str_mv AT zolotoranna quantifyingassociationsbetweenchildhealthandneighborhoodsocialvulnerabilitydoesthechoiceofindexmatter
AT huangrow quantifyingassociationsbetweenchildhealthandneighborhoodsocialvulnerabilitydoesthechoiceofindexmatter
AT bhavsarnrupena quantifyingassociationsbetweenchildhealthandneighborhoodsocialvulnerabilitydoesthechoiceofindexmatter
AT cholerarushina quantifyingassociationsbetweenchildhealthandneighborhoodsocialvulnerabilitydoesthechoiceofindexmatter