Cargando…

From active treatment to surveillance: How the barriers and facilitators of implementing survivorship care planning could be an opportunity for telehealth in oncology care for rural patients

PURPOSE: Cancer survivorship care planning is a recognized yet underutilized aspect of care delivery and the opportunity for telehealth in cancer survivorship is examined. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study in Vermont and New Hampshire to characterize perceptions of rural cancer providers a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alford-Teaster, Jenn, Vaclavik, Danielle Danielle, Imset, Inger, Schiffelbein, Jenna, Lyons, Kathleen, Kapadia, Nirav, Olson, Ardis, McGrath, Elizabeth, Schifferdecker, Karen, Onega, Tracy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Journal Experts 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37461684
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3117303/v1
_version_ 1785074090721148928
author Alford-Teaster, Jenn
Vaclavik, Danielle Danielle
Imset, Inger
Schiffelbein, Jenna
Lyons, Kathleen
Kapadia, Nirav
Olson, Ardis
McGrath, Elizabeth
Schifferdecker, Karen
Onega, Tracy
author_facet Alford-Teaster, Jenn
Vaclavik, Danielle Danielle
Imset, Inger
Schiffelbein, Jenna
Lyons, Kathleen
Kapadia, Nirav
Olson, Ardis
McGrath, Elizabeth
Schifferdecker, Karen
Onega, Tracy
author_sort Alford-Teaster, Jenn
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Cancer survivorship care planning is a recognized yet underutilized aspect of care delivery and the opportunity for telehealth in cancer survivorship is examined. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study in Vermont and New Hampshire to characterize perceptions of rural cancer providers and survivors regarding survivorship transitions in care, consisting of: a) key informant interviews with primary care and oncology clinicians, b) a broader survey of clinicians, and c) surveys and focus group discussions with cancer survivors. In these interactions, we also explored the use of a shared telehealth survivorship care planning appointment between oncology clinicians, primary care clinicians, and survivors RESULTS: Results from surveys and interviews clustered around several themes, namely: 1) infrequent care transitioning back to primary care; 2) lack of mental health services; 3) lack of side effect education; 4) low perceived utility of survivorship care plans; 5) clinicians exclusively communicate using the EMR and finding it imperfect; and 6) clinicians and survivors reported conflicting perceptions regarding survivors’ access to telehealth options. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that telehealth has potential to augment the delivery of survivorship care planning; however, key technical and logistical concerns need to be addressed, particularly enhanced coordination across clinician scheduling and ensuring payment parity for various telehealth implementation strategies. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Cancer survivorship care planning is a recognized yet underutilized aspect of care delivery. There is an opportunity for the application of telehealth for supportive care in survivorship care planning, which should be a focus of further research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10350223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Journal Experts
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103502232023-07-17 From active treatment to surveillance: How the barriers and facilitators of implementing survivorship care planning could be an opportunity for telehealth in oncology care for rural patients Alford-Teaster, Jenn Vaclavik, Danielle Danielle Imset, Inger Schiffelbein, Jenna Lyons, Kathleen Kapadia, Nirav Olson, Ardis McGrath, Elizabeth Schifferdecker, Karen Onega, Tracy Res Sq Article PURPOSE: Cancer survivorship care planning is a recognized yet underutilized aspect of care delivery and the opportunity for telehealth in cancer survivorship is examined. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study in Vermont and New Hampshire to characterize perceptions of rural cancer providers and survivors regarding survivorship transitions in care, consisting of: a) key informant interviews with primary care and oncology clinicians, b) a broader survey of clinicians, and c) surveys and focus group discussions with cancer survivors. In these interactions, we also explored the use of a shared telehealth survivorship care planning appointment between oncology clinicians, primary care clinicians, and survivors RESULTS: Results from surveys and interviews clustered around several themes, namely: 1) infrequent care transitioning back to primary care; 2) lack of mental health services; 3) lack of side effect education; 4) low perceived utility of survivorship care plans; 5) clinicians exclusively communicate using the EMR and finding it imperfect; and 6) clinicians and survivors reported conflicting perceptions regarding survivors’ access to telehealth options. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that telehealth has potential to augment the delivery of survivorship care planning; however, key technical and logistical concerns need to be addressed, particularly enhanced coordination across clinician scheduling and ensuring payment parity for various telehealth implementation strategies. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Cancer survivorship care planning is a recognized yet underutilized aspect of care delivery. There is an opportunity for the application of telehealth for supportive care in survivorship care planning, which should be a focus of further research. American Journal Experts 2023-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10350223/ /pubmed/37461684 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3117303/v1 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
spellingShingle Article
Alford-Teaster, Jenn
Vaclavik, Danielle Danielle
Imset, Inger
Schiffelbein, Jenna
Lyons, Kathleen
Kapadia, Nirav
Olson, Ardis
McGrath, Elizabeth
Schifferdecker, Karen
Onega, Tracy
From active treatment to surveillance: How the barriers and facilitators of implementing survivorship care planning could be an opportunity for telehealth in oncology care for rural patients
title From active treatment to surveillance: How the barriers and facilitators of implementing survivorship care planning could be an opportunity for telehealth in oncology care for rural patients
title_full From active treatment to surveillance: How the barriers and facilitators of implementing survivorship care planning could be an opportunity for telehealth in oncology care for rural patients
title_fullStr From active treatment to surveillance: How the barriers and facilitators of implementing survivorship care planning could be an opportunity for telehealth in oncology care for rural patients
title_full_unstemmed From active treatment to surveillance: How the barriers and facilitators of implementing survivorship care planning could be an opportunity for telehealth in oncology care for rural patients
title_short From active treatment to surveillance: How the barriers and facilitators of implementing survivorship care planning could be an opportunity for telehealth in oncology care for rural patients
title_sort from active treatment to surveillance: how the barriers and facilitators of implementing survivorship care planning could be an opportunity for telehealth in oncology care for rural patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37461684
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3117303/v1
work_keys_str_mv AT alfordteasterjenn fromactivetreatmenttosurveillancehowthebarriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingsurvivorshipcareplanningcouldbeanopportunityfortelehealthinoncologycareforruralpatients
AT vaclavikdanielledanielle fromactivetreatmenttosurveillancehowthebarriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingsurvivorshipcareplanningcouldbeanopportunityfortelehealthinoncologycareforruralpatients
AT imsetinger fromactivetreatmenttosurveillancehowthebarriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingsurvivorshipcareplanningcouldbeanopportunityfortelehealthinoncologycareforruralpatients
AT schiffelbeinjenna fromactivetreatmenttosurveillancehowthebarriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingsurvivorshipcareplanningcouldbeanopportunityfortelehealthinoncologycareforruralpatients
AT lyonskathleen fromactivetreatmenttosurveillancehowthebarriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingsurvivorshipcareplanningcouldbeanopportunityfortelehealthinoncologycareforruralpatients
AT kapadianirav fromactivetreatmenttosurveillancehowthebarriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingsurvivorshipcareplanningcouldbeanopportunityfortelehealthinoncologycareforruralpatients
AT olsonardis fromactivetreatmenttosurveillancehowthebarriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingsurvivorshipcareplanningcouldbeanopportunityfortelehealthinoncologycareforruralpatients
AT mcgrathelizabeth fromactivetreatmenttosurveillancehowthebarriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingsurvivorshipcareplanningcouldbeanopportunityfortelehealthinoncologycareforruralpatients
AT schifferdeckerkaren fromactivetreatmenttosurveillancehowthebarriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingsurvivorshipcareplanningcouldbeanopportunityfortelehealthinoncologycareforruralpatients
AT onegatracy fromactivetreatmenttosurveillancehowthebarriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingsurvivorshipcareplanningcouldbeanopportunityfortelehealthinoncologycareforruralpatients