Cargando…
From active treatment to surveillance: How the barriers and facilitators of implementing survivorship care planning could be an opportunity for telehealth in oncology care for rural patients
PURPOSE: Cancer survivorship care planning is a recognized yet underutilized aspect of care delivery and the opportunity for telehealth in cancer survivorship is examined. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study in Vermont and New Hampshire to characterize perceptions of rural cancer providers a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Journal Experts
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37461684 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3117303/v1 |
_version_ | 1785074090721148928 |
---|---|
author | Alford-Teaster, Jenn Vaclavik, Danielle Danielle Imset, Inger Schiffelbein, Jenna Lyons, Kathleen Kapadia, Nirav Olson, Ardis McGrath, Elizabeth Schifferdecker, Karen Onega, Tracy |
author_facet | Alford-Teaster, Jenn Vaclavik, Danielle Danielle Imset, Inger Schiffelbein, Jenna Lyons, Kathleen Kapadia, Nirav Olson, Ardis McGrath, Elizabeth Schifferdecker, Karen Onega, Tracy |
author_sort | Alford-Teaster, Jenn |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Cancer survivorship care planning is a recognized yet underutilized aspect of care delivery and the opportunity for telehealth in cancer survivorship is examined. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study in Vermont and New Hampshire to characterize perceptions of rural cancer providers and survivors regarding survivorship transitions in care, consisting of: a) key informant interviews with primary care and oncology clinicians, b) a broader survey of clinicians, and c) surveys and focus group discussions with cancer survivors. In these interactions, we also explored the use of a shared telehealth survivorship care planning appointment between oncology clinicians, primary care clinicians, and survivors RESULTS: Results from surveys and interviews clustered around several themes, namely: 1) infrequent care transitioning back to primary care; 2) lack of mental health services; 3) lack of side effect education; 4) low perceived utility of survivorship care plans; 5) clinicians exclusively communicate using the EMR and finding it imperfect; and 6) clinicians and survivors reported conflicting perceptions regarding survivors’ access to telehealth options. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that telehealth has potential to augment the delivery of survivorship care planning; however, key technical and logistical concerns need to be addressed, particularly enhanced coordination across clinician scheduling and ensuring payment parity for various telehealth implementation strategies. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Cancer survivorship care planning is a recognized yet underutilized aspect of care delivery. There is an opportunity for the application of telehealth for supportive care in survivorship care planning, which should be a focus of further research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10350223 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Journal Experts |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103502232023-07-17 From active treatment to surveillance: How the barriers and facilitators of implementing survivorship care planning could be an opportunity for telehealth in oncology care for rural patients Alford-Teaster, Jenn Vaclavik, Danielle Danielle Imset, Inger Schiffelbein, Jenna Lyons, Kathleen Kapadia, Nirav Olson, Ardis McGrath, Elizabeth Schifferdecker, Karen Onega, Tracy Res Sq Article PURPOSE: Cancer survivorship care planning is a recognized yet underutilized aspect of care delivery and the opportunity for telehealth in cancer survivorship is examined. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study in Vermont and New Hampshire to characterize perceptions of rural cancer providers and survivors regarding survivorship transitions in care, consisting of: a) key informant interviews with primary care and oncology clinicians, b) a broader survey of clinicians, and c) surveys and focus group discussions with cancer survivors. In these interactions, we also explored the use of a shared telehealth survivorship care planning appointment between oncology clinicians, primary care clinicians, and survivors RESULTS: Results from surveys and interviews clustered around several themes, namely: 1) infrequent care transitioning back to primary care; 2) lack of mental health services; 3) lack of side effect education; 4) low perceived utility of survivorship care plans; 5) clinicians exclusively communicate using the EMR and finding it imperfect; and 6) clinicians and survivors reported conflicting perceptions regarding survivors’ access to telehealth options. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that telehealth has potential to augment the delivery of survivorship care planning; however, key technical and logistical concerns need to be addressed, particularly enhanced coordination across clinician scheduling and ensuring payment parity for various telehealth implementation strategies. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Cancer survivorship care planning is a recognized yet underutilized aspect of care delivery. There is an opportunity for the application of telehealth for supportive care in survivorship care planning, which should be a focus of further research. American Journal Experts 2023-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10350223/ /pubmed/37461684 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3117303/v1 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. |
spellingShingle | Article Alford-Teaster, Jenn Vaclavik, Danielle Danielle Imset, Inger Schiffelbein, Jenna Lyons, Kathleen Kapadia, Nirav Olson, Ardis McGrath, Elizabeth Schifferdecker, Karen Onega, Tracy From active treatment to surveillance: How the barriers and facilitators of implementing survivorship care planning could be an opportunity for telehealth in oncology care for rural patients |
title | From active treatment to surveillance: How the barriers and facilitators of implementing survivorship care planning could be an opportunity for telehealth in oncology care for rural patients |
title_full | From active treatment to surveillance: How the barriers and facilitators of implementing survivorship care planning could be an opportunity for telehealth in oncology care for rural patients |
title_fullStr | From active treatment to surveillance: How the barriers and facilitators of implementing survivorship care planning could be an opportunity for telehealth in oncology care for rural patients |
title_full_unstemmed | From active treatment to surveillance: How the barriers and facilitators of implementing survivorship care planning could be an opportunity for telehealth in oncology care for rural patients |
title_short | From active treatment to surveillance: How the barriers and facilitators of implementing survivorship care planning could be an opportunity for telehealth in oncology care for rural patients |
title_sort | from active treatment to surveillance: how the barriers and facilitators of implementing survivorship care planning could be an opportunity for telehealth in oncology care for rural patients |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37461684 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3117303/v1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alfordteasterjenn fromactivetreatmenttosurveillancehowthebarriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingsurvivorshipcareplanningcouldbeanopportunityfortelehealthinoncologycareforruralpatients AT vaclavikdanielledanielle fromactivetreatmenttosurveillancehowthebarriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingsurvivorshipcareplanningcouldbeanopportunityfortelehealthinoncologycareforruralpatients AT imsetinger fromactivetreatmenttosurveillancehowthebarriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingsurvivorshipcareplanningcouldbeanopportunityfortelehealthinoncologycareforruralpatients AT schiffelbeinjenna fromactivetreatmenttosurveillancehowthebarriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingsurvivorshipcareplanningcouldbeanopportunityfortelehealthinoncologycareforruralpatients AT lyonskathleen fromactivetreatmenttosurveillancehowthebarriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingsurvivorshipcareplanningcouldbeanopportunityfortelehealthinoncologycareforruralpatients AT kapadianirav fromactivetreatmenttosurveillancehowthebarriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingsurvivorshipcareplanningcouldbeanopportunityfortelehealthinoncologycareforruralpatients AT olsonardis fromactivetreatmenttosurveillancehowthebarriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingsurvivorshipcareplanningcouldbeanopportunityfortelehealthinoncologycareforruralpatients AT mcgrathelizabeth fromactivetreatmenttosurveillancehowthebarriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingsurvivorshipcareplanningcouldbeanopportunityfortelehealthinoncologycareforruralpatients AT schifferdeckerkaren fromactivetreatmenttosurveillancehowthebarriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingsurvivorshipcareplanningcouldbeanopportunityfortelehealthinoncologycareforruralpatients AT onegatracy fromactivetreatmenttosurveillancehowthebarriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingsurvivorshipcareplanningcouldbeanopportunityfortelehealthinoncologycareforruralpatients |