Cargando…

The Comparison between Cemented and Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND: Hemiarthroplasty is the standard treatment for patients with femoral neck fractures (FNFs). Controversy exists over the use of bone cement in hip fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty. OBJECTIVE: We performed an updated systematic review and meta‐analysis to compare cemented and unceme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Yue, Tang, Xiumei, Liao, Yan, Liu, Shihua, Li, Lingli, Li, Pengcheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37154088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13716
_version_ 1785074123609735168
author He, Yue
Tang, Xiumei
Liao, Yan
Liu, Shihua
Li, Lingli
Li, Pengcheng
author_facet He, Yue
Tang, Xiumei
Liao, Yan
Liu, Shihua
Li, Lingli
Li, Pengcheng
author_sort He, Yue
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hemiarthroplasty is the standard treatment for patients with femoral neck fractures (FNFs). Controversy exists over the use of bone cement in hip fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty. OBJECTIVE: We performed an updated systematic review and meta‐analysis to compare cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fractures. METHODS: A literature review was conducted using Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, Wang Fang, and Sino Med databases. Studies comparing cemented with uncemented hemiarthroplasty for FNFs in elderly patients up to June 2022 were included. Data were extracted, meta‐analyzed, and pooled as risk ratios (RRs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). RESULTS: Twenty‐four RCTs involving 3471 patients (1749 cement; 1722 uncemented) were analyzed. Patients with cemented intervention had better outcomes regarding hip function, pain, and complications. Significant differences were found in terms of HHS at 6 weeks (WMD 12.5; 95% CI 6.0–17.0; P < 0.001), 3 months (WMD 3.3; 95% CI 1.6–5.0; P < 0.001), 4 months (WMD 7.3; 95% CI 3.4–11.2; P < 0.001), and 6 months (WMD 4.6; 95% CI 3.3–5.8; P < 0.001) postoperatively. Patients with cemented hemiarthroplasty had lower rates of pain (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.39–0.9; P = 0.013), prosthetic fracture (RR 0.24; 95% CI 0.16–0.38; P < 0.001), subsidence/loosening (RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.11–0.78; P = 0.014), revisions (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.40–0.89; P = 0.012), and pressure ulcers (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.23–0.82; P = 0.01) at the expense of longer surgery time (WMD 7.87; 95% CI 5.71–10.02; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This meta‐analysis demonstrated that patients with cemented hemiarthroplasty had better results in hip function and pain relief and lower complication rates at the expense of prolonged surgery time. Cemented hemiarthroplasty is recommended based on our findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10350391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103503912023-07-18 The Comparison between Cemented and Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials He, Yue Tang, Xiumei Liao, Yan Liu, Shihua Li, Lingli Li, Pengcheng Orthop Surg Review Articles BACKGROUND: Hemiarthroplasty is the standard treatment for patients with femoral neck fractures (FNFs). Controversy exists over the use of bone cement in hip fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty. OBJECTIVE: We performed an updated systematic review and meta‐analysis to compare cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fractures. METHODS: A literature review was conducted using Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, Wang Fang, and Sino Med databases. Studies comparing cemented with uncemented hemiarthroplasty for FNFs in elderly patients up to June 2022 were included. Data were extracted, meta‐analyzed, and pooled as risk ratios (RRs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). RESULTS: Twenty‐four RCTs involving 3471 patients (1749 cement; 1722 uncemented) were analyzed. Patients with cemented intervention had better outcomes regarding hip function, pain, and complications. Significant differences were found in terms of HHS at 6 weeks (WMD 12.5; 95% CI 6.0–17.0; P < 0.001), 3 months (WMD 3.3; 95% CI 1.6–5.0; P < 0.001), 4 months (WMD 7.3; 95% CI 3.4–11.2; P < 0.001), and 6 months (WMD 4.6; 95% CI 3.3–5.8; P < 0.001) postoperatively. Patients with cemented hemiarthroplasty had lower rates of pain (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.39–0.9; P = 0.013), prosthetic fracture (RR 0.24; 95% CI 0.16–0.38; P < 0.001), subsidence/loosening (RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.11–0.78; P = 0.014), revisions (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.40–0.89; P = 0.012), and pressure ulcers (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.23–0.82; P = 0.01) at the expense of longer surgery time (WMD 7.87; 95% CI 5.71–10.02; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This meta‐analysis demonstrated that patients with cemented hemiarthroplasty had better results in hip function and pain relief and lower complication rates at the expense of prolonged surgery time. Cemented hemiarthroplasty is recommended based on our findings. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2023-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10350391/ /pubmed/37154088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13716 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Review Articles
He, Yue
Tang, Xiumei
Liao, Yan
Liu, Shihua
Li, Lingli
Li, Pengcheng
The Comparison between Cemented and Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title The Comparison between Cemented and Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full The Comparison between Cemented and Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr The Comparison between Cemented and Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed The Comparison between Cemented and Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short The Comparison between Cemented and Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort comparison between cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37154088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13716
work_keys_str_mv AT heyue thecomparisonbetweencementedanduncementedhemiarthroplastyinpatientswithfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT tangxiumei thecomparisonbetweencementedanduncementedhemiarthroplastyinpatientswithfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liaoyan thecomparisonbetweencementedanduncementedhemiarthroplastyinpatientswithfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liushihua thecomparisonbetweencementedanduncementedhemiarthroplastyinpatientswithfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lilingli thecomparisonbetweencementedanduncementedhemiarthroplastyinpatientswithfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lipengcheng thecomparisonbetweencementedanduncementedhemiarthroplastyinpatientswithfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT heyue comparisonbetweencementedanduncementedhemiarthroplastyinpatientswithfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT tangxiumei comparisonbetweencementedanduncementedhemiarthroplastyinpatientswithfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liaoyan comparisonbetweencementedanduncementedhemiarthroplastyinpatientswithfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liushihua comparisonbetweencementedanduncementedhemiarthroplastyinpatientswithfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lilingli comparisonbetweencementedanduncementedhemiarthroplastyinpatientswithfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lipengcheng comparisonbetweencementedanduncementedhemiarthroplastyinpatientswithfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials