Cargando…
The Comparison between Cemented and Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
BACKGROUND: Hemiarthroplasty is the standard treatment for patients with femoral neck fractures (FNFs). Controversy exists over the use of bone cement in hip fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty. OBJECTIVE: We performed an updated systematic review and meta‐analysis to compare cemented and unceme...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37154088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13716 |
_version_ | 1785074123609735168 |
---|---|
author | He, Yue Tang, Xiumei Liao, Yan Liu, Shihua Li, Lingli Li, Pengcheng |
author_facet | He, Yue Tang, Xiumei Liao, Yan Liu, Shihua Li, Lingli Li, Pengcheng |
author_sort | He, Yue |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hemiarthroplasty is the standard treatment for patients with femoral neck fractures (FNFs). Controversy exists over the use of bone cement in hip fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty. OBJECTIVE: We performed an updated systematic review and meta‐analysis to compare cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fractures. METHODS: A literature review was conducted using Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, Wang Fang, and Sino Med databases. Studies comparing cemented with uncemented hemiarthroplasty for FNFs in elderly patients up to June 2022 were included. Data were extracted, meta‐analyzed, and pooled as risk ratios (RRs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). RESULTS: Twenty‐four RCTs involving 3471 patients (1749 cement; 1722 uncemented) were analyzed. Patients with cemented intervention had better outcomes regarding hip function, pain, and complications. Significant differences were found in terms of HHS at 6 weeks (WMD 12.5; 95% CI 6.0–17.0; P < 0.001), 3 months (WMD 3.3; 95% CI 1.6–5.0; P < 0.001), 4 months (WMD 7.3; 95% CI 3.4–11.2; P < 0.001), and 6 months (WMD 4.6; 95% CI 3.3–5.8; P < 0.001) postoperatively. Patients with cemented hemiarthroplasty had lower rates of pain (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.39–0.9; P = 0.013), prosthetic fracture (RR 0.24; 95% CI 0.16–0.38; P < 0.001), subsidence/loosening (RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.11–0.78; P = 0.014), revisions (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.40–0.89; P = 0.012), and pressure ulcers (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.23–0.82; P = 0.01) at the expense of longer surgery time (WMD 7.87; 95% CI 5.71–10.02; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This meta‐analysis demonstrated that patients with cemented hemiarthroplasty had better results in hip function and pain relief and lower complication rates at the expense of prolonged surgery time. Cemented hemiarthroplasty is recommended based on our findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10350391 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103503912023-07-18 The Comparison between Cemented and Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials He, Yue Tang, Xiumei Liao, Yan Liu, Shihua Li, Lingli Li, Pengcheng Orthop Surg Review Articles BACKGROUND: Hemiarthroplasty is the standard treatment for patients with femoral neck fractures (FNFs). Controversy exists over the use of bone cement in hip fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty. OBJECTIVE: We performed an updated systematic review and meta‐analysis to compare cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fractures. METHODS: A literature review was conducted using Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, Wang Fang, and Sino Med databases. Studies comparing cemented with uncemented hemiarthroplasty for FNFs in elderly patients up to June 2022 were included. Data were extracted, meta‐analyzed, and pooled as risk ratios (RRs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). RESULTS: Twenty‐four RCTs involving 3471 patients (1749 cement; 1722 uncemented) were analyzed. Patients with cemented intervention had better outcomes regarding hip function, pain, and complications. Significant differences were found in terms of HHS at 6 weeks (WMD 12.5; 95% CI 6.0–17.0; P < 0.001), 3 months (WMD 3.3; 95% CI 1.6–5.0; P < 0.001), 4 months (WMD 7.3; 95% CI 3.4–11.2; P < 0.001), and 6 months (WMD 4.6; 95% CI 3.3–5.8; P < 0.001) postoperatively. Patients with cemented hemiarthroplasty had lower rates of pain (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.39–0.9; P = 0.013), prosthetic fracture (RR 0.24; 95% CI 0.16–0.38; P < 0.001), subsidence/loosening (RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.11–0.78; P = 0.014), revisions (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.40–0.89; P = 0.012), and pressure ulcers (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.23–0.82; P = 0.01) at the expense of longer surgery time (WMD 7.87; 95% CI 5.71–10.02; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This meta‐analysis demonstrated that patients with cemented hemiarthroplasty had better results in hip function and pain relief and lower complication rates at the expense of prolonged surgery time. Cemented hemiarthroplasty is recommended based on our findings. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2023-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10350391/ /pubmed/37154088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13716 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles He, Yue Tang, Xiumei Liao, Yan Liu, Shihua Li, Lingli Li, Pengcheng The Comparison between Cemented and Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title | The Comparison between Cemented and Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | The Comparison between Cemented and Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | The Comparison between Cemented and Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | The Comparison between Cemented and Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | The Comparison between Cemented and Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | comparison between cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37154088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13716 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heyue thecomparisonbetweencementedanduncementedhemiarthroplastyinpatientswithfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT tangxiumei thecomparisonbetweencementedanduncementedhemiarthroplastyinpatientswithfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT liaoyan thecomparisonbetweencementedanduncementedhemiarthroplastyinpatientswithfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT liushihua thecomparisonbetweencementedanduncementedhemiarthroplastyinpatientswithfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT lilingli thecomparisonbetweencementedanduncementedhemiarthroplastyinpatientswithfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT lipengcheng thecomparisonbetweencementedanduncementedhemiarthroplastyinpatientswithfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT heyue comparisonbetweencementedanduncementedhemiarthroplastyinpatientswithfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT tangxiumei comparisonbetweencementedanduncementedhemiarthroplastyinpatientswithfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT liaoyan comparisonbetweencementedanduncementedhemiarthroplastyinpatientswithfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT liushihua comparisonbetweencementedanduncementedhemiarthroplastyinpatientswithfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT lilingli comparisonbetweencementedanduncementedhemiarthroplastyinpatientswithfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT lipengcheng comparisonbetweencementedanduncementedhemiarthroplastyinpatientswithfemoralneckfracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |