Cargando…

Recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in Central and Eastern European countries

INTRODUCTION: Meaningful patient involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) is essential in ensuring that the interests of the affected patient population, their families, and the general public are accurately reflected in coverage and reimbursement decisions. Central and Eastern European (CE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jakab, Ivett, Dimitrova, Maria, Houÿez, François, Bereczky, Tamás, Fövényes, Miroslava, Maravic, Zorana, Belina, Ivica, Andriciuc, Christian, Tóth, Krisztina, Piniazhko, Oresta, Hren, Rok, Gutierrez-Ibarluzea, Iñaki, Czech, Marcin, Tesar, Tomas, Niewada, Maciej, Lorenzovici, László, Kamusheva, Maria, Manova, Manoela, Savova, Alexandra, Mitkova, Zornitsa, Tachkov, Konstantin, Németh, Bertalan, Petykó, Zsuzsanna Ida, Dawoud, Dalia, Delnoij, Diana, Knies, Saskia, Goettsch, Wim, Kaló, Zoltán
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37465169
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1176200
_version_ 1785074142377148416
author Jakab, Ivett
Dimitrova, Maria
Houÿez, François
Bereczky, Tamás
Fövényes, Miroslava
Maravic, Zorana
Belina, Ivica
Andriciuc, Christian
Tóth, Krisztina
Piniazhko, Oresta
Hren, Rok
Gutierrez-Ibarluzea, Iñaki
Czech, Marcin
Tesar, Tomas
Niewada, Maciej
Lorenzovici, László
Kamusheva, Maria
Manova, Manoela
Savova, Alexandra
Mitkova, Zornitsa
Tachkov, Konstantin
Németh, Bertalan
Petykó, Zsuzsanna Ida
Dawoud, Dalia
Delnoij, Diana
Knies, Saskia
Goettsch, Wim
Kaló, Zoltán
author_facet Jakab, Ivett
Dimitrova, Maria
Houÿez, François
Bereczky, Tamás
Fövényes, Miroslava
Maravic, Zorana
Belina, Ivica
Andriciuc, Christian
Tóth, Krisztina
Piniazhko, Oresta
Hren, Rok
Gutierrez-Ibarluzea, Iñaki
Czech, Marcin
Tesar, Tomas
Niewada, Maciej
Lorenzovici, László
Kamusheva, Maria
Manova, Manoela
Savova, Alexandra
Mitkova, Zornitsa
Tachkov, Konstantin
Németh, Bertalan
Petykó, Zsuzsanna Ida
Dawoud, Dalia
Delnoij, Diana
Knies, Saskia
Goettsch, Wim
Kaló, Zoltán
author_sort Jakab, Ivett
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Meaningful patient involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) is essential in ensuring that the interests of the affected patient population, their families, and the general public are accurately reflected in coverage and reimbursement decisions. Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries are generally at less advanced stages of implementing HTA, which is particularly true for patient involvement activities. As part of the Horizon2020 HTx project, this research aimed to form recommendations for critical barriers to patient involvement in HTA in CEE countries. METHODS: Built on previous research findings on potential barriers, a prioritisation survey was conducted online with CEE stakeholders. Recommendations for prioritised barriers were formed through a face-to-face workshop by CEE stakeholders and HTx experts. RESULTS: A total of 105 stakeholders from 13 CEE countries completed the prioritisation survey and identified 12 of the 22 potential barriers as highly important. The workshop had 36 participants representing 9 CEE countries, and 5 Western European countries coming together to discuss solutions in order to form recommendations based on best practices, real-life experience, and transferability aspects. Stakeholder groups involved in both phases included HTA organisation representatives, payers, patients, caregivers, patient organisation representatives, patient experts, health care providers, academic and non-academic researchers, health care consultants and health technology manufacturers/providers. As a result, 12 recommendations were formed specified to the CEE region’s context, but potentially useful for a broader geographic audience. CONCLUSION: In this paper, we present 12 recommendations for meaningful, systematic, and sustainable patient involvement in HTA in CEE countries. Our hope is that engaging more than a hundred CEE stakeholders in the study helped to spread awareness of the importance and potential of patient involvement and that the resulting recommendations provide tangible steps for the way forward. Future studies shall focus on country-specific case studies of the implemented recommendations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10350487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103504872023-07-18 Recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in Central and Eastern European countries Jakab, Ivett Dimitrova, Maria Houÿez, François Bereczky, Tamás Fövényes, Miroslava Maravic, Zorana Belina, Ivica Andriciuc, Christian Tóth, Krisztina Piniazhko, Oresta Hren, Rok Gutierrez-Ibarluzea, Iñaki Czech, Marcin Tesar, Tomas Niewada, Maciej Lorenzovici, László Kamusheva, Maria Manova, Manoela Savova, Alexandra Mitkova, Zornitsa Tachkov, Konstantin Németh, Bertalan Petykó, Zsuzsanna Ida Dawoud, Dalia Delnoij, Diana Knies, Saskia Goettsch, Wim Kaló, Zoltán Front Public Health Public Health INTRODUCTION: Meaningful patient involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) is essential in ensuring that the interests of the affected patient population, their families, and the general public are accurately reflected in coverage and reimbursement decisions. Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries are generally at less advanced stages of implementing HTA, which is particularly true for patient involvement activities. As part of the Horizon2020 HTx project, this research aimed to form recommendations for critical barriers to patient involvement in HTA in CEE countries. METHODS: Built on previous research findings on potential barriers, a prioritisation survey was conducted online with CEE stakeholders. Recommendations for prioritised barriers were formed through a face-to-face workshop by CEE stakeholders and HTx experts. RESULTS: A total of 105 stakeholders from 13 CEE countries completed the prioritisation survey and identified 12 of the 22 potential barriers as highly important. The workshop had 36 participants representing 9 CEE countries, and 5 Western European countries coming together to discuss solutions in order to form recommendations based on best practices, real-life experience, and transferability aspects. Stakeholder groups involved in both phases included HTA organisation representatives, payers, patients, caregivers, patient organisation representatives, patient experts, health care providers, academic and non-academic researchers, health care consultants and health technology manufacturers/providers. As a result, 12 recommendations were formed specified to the CEE region’s context, but potentially useful for a broader geographic audience. CONCLUSION: In this paper, we present 12 recommendations for meaningful, systematic, and sustainable patient involvement in HTA in CEE countries. Our hope is that engaging more than a hundred CEE stakeholders in the study helped to spread awareness of the importance and potential of patient involvement and that the resulting recommendations provide tangible steps for the way forward. Future studies shall focus on country-specific case studies of the implemented recommendations. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10350487/ /pubmed/37465169 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1176200 Text en Copyright © 2023 Jakab, Dimitrova, Houÿez, Bereczky, Fövényes, Maravic, Belina, Andriciuc, Tóth, Piniazhko, Hren, Gutierrez-Ibarluzea, Czech, Tesar, Niewada, Lorenzovici, Kamusheva, Manova, Savova, Mitkova, Tachkov, Németh, Petykó, Dawoud, Delnoij, Knies, Goettsch and Kaló. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Jakab, Ivett
Dimitrova, Maria
Houÿez, François
Bereczky, Tamás
Fövényes, Miroslava
Maravic, Zorana
Belina, Ivica
Andriciuc, Christian
Tóth, Krisztina
Piniazhko, Oresta
Hren, Rok
Gutierrez-Ibarluzea, Iñaki
Czech, Marcin
Tesar, Tomas
Niewada, Maciej
Lorenzovici, László
Kamusheva, Maria
Manova, Manoela
Savova, Alexandra
Mitkova, Zornitsa
Tachkov, Konstantin
Németh, Bertalan
Petykó, Zsuzsanna Ida
Dawoud, Dalia
Delnoij, Diana
Knies, Saskia
Goettsch, Wim
Kaló, Zoltán
Recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in Central and Eastern European countries
title Recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in Central and Eastern European countries
title_full Recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in Central and Eastern European countries
title_fullStr Recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in Central and Eastern European countries
title_full_unstemmed Recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in Central and Eastern European countries
title_short Recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in Central and Eastern European countries
title_sort recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in central and eastern european countries
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37465169
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1176200
work_keys_str_mv AT jakabivett recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT dimitrovamaria recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT houyezfrancois recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT bereczkytamas recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT fovenyesmiroslava recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT maraviczorana recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT belinaivica recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT andriciucchristian recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT tothkrisztina recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT piniazhkooresta recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT hrenrok recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT gutierrezibarluzeainaki recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT czechmarcin recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT tesartomas recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT niewadamaciej recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT lorenzovicilaszlo recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT kamushevamaria recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT manovamanoela recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT savovaalexandra recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT mitkovazornitsa recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT tachkovkonstantin recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT nemethbertalan recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT petykozsuzsannaida recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT dawouddalia recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT delnoijdiana recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT kniessaskia recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT goettschwim recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT kalozoltan recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries