Cargando…

Using an experiment among clinical experts to determine the cost and clinical impact of rapid whole exome sequencing in acute pediatric settings

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the cost and clinical impacts of rapid whole-exome sequencing (rWES) for managing pediatric patients with unknown etiologies of critical illnesses through an expert elicitation experiment. METHOD: Physicians in the intervention group (n = 10) could order rWES to complete three re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kapol, Nattiya, Kamolvisit, Wuttichart, Kongkiattikul, Lalida, Huang-Ku, Evan, Sribundit, Namfon, Lochid-Amnuay, Surasit, Samprasit, Nathapol, Dulsamphan, Thamonwan, Juntama, Parntip, Suwanpanich, Chotika, Boonsimma, Ponghathai, Shotelersuk, Vorasuk, Teerawattananon, Yot
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37465423
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1204853
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the cost and clinical impacts of rapid whole-exome sequencing (rWES) for managing pediatric patients with unknown etiologies of critical illnesses through an expert elicitation experiment. METHOD: Physicians in the intervention group (n = 10) could order rWES to complete three real-world case studies, while physicians in the control group (n = 8) could not. Costs and health outcomes between and within groups were compared. RESULTS: The cost incurred in the intervention group was consistently higher than the control by 60,000–70,000 THB. Fewer other investigation costs were incurred when rWES could provide a diagnosis. Less cost was incurred when an rWES that could lead to a change in management was ordered earlier. Diagnostic accuracy and the quality of non-pharmaceutical interventions were superior when rWES was available. CONCLUSION: In acute pediatric settings, rWES offered clinical benefits at the average cost of 60,000–70,000 THB. Whether this test is cost-effective warrants further investigations. Several challenges, including cost and ethical concerns for assessing high-cost technology for rare diseases in resource-limited settings, were potentially overcome by our study design using expert elicitation methods.