Cargando…

Assessing Enamel Wear of Monolithic Ceramics With Micro-CT and Intra-oral Scanner

OBJECTIVE: This in vitro study aimed to investigate enamel wear against 3 monolithic ceramics using 2 methods of measurement. METHODS: Three groups of standard flat monolithic ceramic specimens including zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass (Vita Suprinity, VITA Zahnfabrik), yttria-stabilised...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murbay, Sukhdeep, Yeung, Shadow Kim Wai, Yip, Chui Ying, Pow, Edmond Ho Nang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36428104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2022.10.007
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: This in vitro study aimed to investigate enamel wear against 3 monolithic ceramics using 2 methods of measurement. METHODS: Three groups of standard flat monolithic ceramic specimens including zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass (Vita Suprinity, VITA Zahnfabrik), yttria-stabilised tetragonal zirconia (Lava Esthetic Zirconia), and lithium disilicate glass (IPS e.max Press, Ivoclar Vivadent) were prepared, with human enamel used as the control group. Each specimen was subjected to the 2-body wear test at 49 N for 250,000 cycles. Enamel antagonists were evaluated with micro-computed tomography (CT) and intra-oral scanner, allowing 3-dimensional images of vertical wear and volumetric loss of enamel antagonists to be calculated. One-way analysis of variance followed by Student–Newman–Keuls post hoc tests were used to examine the differences in vertical wear/volumetric loss amongst the groups. Paired t tests and intra-class correlations were used to compare vertical wear/volumetric loss between the micro-CT and intra-oral scanner groups. RESULTS: No significant difference in vertical wear was found amongst all groups. More volumetric loss was found in all test groups than in the control group (P < .001), but no significant difference was found amongst the test groups. There was a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.535, P = .033) between the vertical wear and volumetric loss. No significant difference between the 2 methods of measurement was found. CONCLUSIONS: Monolithic ceramics induce more enamel wear than natural teeth. Both micro-CT and intra-oral scanners can be used for measuring tooth wear with similar performance.