Cargando…

North Carolina Pharmacists’ Support for Hormonal Contraception Prescription Status Change

Pharmacist-prescribed hormonal contraception (HC) may offer additional avenues of access for patients; however, it is unknown whether pharmacists would support over-the-counter access to contraception over pharmacist-prescribed models. Objective: The objective of this study was to understand how Nor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parry, Rachel A., Seamon, Gwen, Scott, Mollie Ashe, Tak, Casey R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35325584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08971900221074966
_version_ 1785074188819628032
author Parry, Rachel A.
Seamon, Gwen
Scott, Mollie Ashe
Tak, Casey R.
author_facet Parry, Rachel A.
Seamon, Gwen
Scott, Mollie Ashe
Tak, Casey R.
author_sort Parry, Rachel A.
collection PubMed
description Pharmacist-prescribed hormonal contraception (HC) may offer additional avenues of access for patients; however, it is unknown whether pharmacists would support over-the-counter access to contraception over pharmacist-prescribed models. Objective: The objective of this study was to understand how North Carolina (NC) pharmacists believed HC should be classified and how pharmacist and pharmacy characteristics were associated with those beliefs. Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional, anonymous, online survey completed by 587 licensed NC pharmacists. The primary outcome of interest was how pharmacists believed HC should be classified: prescription-only, pharmacist-prescribed, behind-the-counter, or over-the-counter. Multinomial bivariate and multivariable regression analyses were conducted to describe the association between pharmacist and pharmacy characteristics with the outcomes of interest through odds ratios and adjusted odds ratios, respectively. Chi-square tests were used to examine the association of geographic location with distribution of attitudes toward HC classification. Results: Fifty-one percent of NC pharmacists supported classification of HC as pharmacist-prescribed, while 23% supported non-prescription (behind- or over-the-counter) classification. Controlling for pharmacist demographics and pharmacy characteristics, completing residency training was significantly associated with supporting pharmacist-prescribed vs prescription-only classification (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.55, P = .02). Pharmacists had higher odds of supporting pharmacist-prescribed vs prescription-only HC if they agreed that they were well trained to do so (aOR = 3.14, P < .01). Distribution of attitudes about classification of HC did not significantly differ by geographic location (P = .14). Conclusions: Most NC pharmacists support deviating from the current prescription-only classification of HC, with more support for pharmacist-prescribed classification. Continuing education programs should focus on training pharmacists to feel more confident prescribing HC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10350693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103506932023-07-18 North Carolina Pharmacists’ Support for Hormonal Contraception Prescription Status Change Parry, Rachel A. Seamon, Gwen Scott, Mollie Ashe Tak, Casey R. J Pharm Pract Research Articles Pharmacist-prescribed hormonal contraception (HC) may offer additional avenues of access for patients; however, it is unknown whether pharmacists would support over-the-counter access to contraception over pharmacist-prescribed models. Objective: The objective of this study was to understand how North Carolina (NC) pharmacists believed HC should be classified and how pharmacist and pharmacy characteristics were associated with those beliefs. Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional, anonymous, online survey completed by 587 licensed NC pharmacists. The primary outcome of interest was how pharmacists believed HC should be classified: prescription-only, pharmacist-prescribed, behind-the-counter, or over-the-counter. Multinomial bivariate and multivariable regression analyses were conducted to describe the association between pharmacist and pharmacy characteristics with the outcomes of interest through odds ratios and adjusted odds ratios, respectively. Chi-square tests were used to examine the association of geographic location with distribution of attitudes toward HC classification. Results: Fifty-one percent of NC pharmacists supported classification of HC as pharmacist-prescribed, while 23% supported non-prescription (behind- or over-the-counter) classification. Controlling for pharmacist demographics and pharmacy characteristics, completing residency training was significantly associated with supporting pharmacist-prescribed vs prescription-only classification (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.55, P = .02). Pharmacists had higher odds of supporting pharmacist-prescribed vs prescription-only HC if they agreed that they were well trained to do so (aOR = 3.14, P < .01). Distribution of attitudes about classification of HC did not significantly differ by geographic location (P = .14). Conclusions: Most NC pharmacists support deviating from the current prescription-only classification of HC, with more support for pharmacist-prescribed classification. Continuing education programs should focus on training pharmacists to feel more confident prescribing HC. SAGE Publications 2022-03-24 2023-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10350693/ /pubmed/35325584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08971900221074966 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Articles
Parry, Rachel A.
Seamon, Gwen
Scott, Mollie Ashe
Tak, Casey R.
North Carolina Pharmacists’ Support for Hormonal Contraception Prescription Status Change
title North Carolina Pharmacists’ Support for Hormonal Contraception Prescription Status Change
title_full North Carolina Pharmacists’ Support for Hormonal Contraception Prescription Status Change
title_fullStr North Carolina Pharmacists’ Support for Hormonal Contraception Prescription Status Change
title_full_unstemmed North Carolina Pharmacists’ Support for Hormonal Contraception Prescription Status Change
title_short North Carolina Pharmacists’ Support for Hormonal Contraception Prescription Status Change
title_sort north carolina pharmacists’ support for hormonal contraception prescription status change
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35325584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08971900221074966
work_keys_str_mv AT parryrachela northcarolinapharmacistssupportforhormonalcontraceptionprescriptionstatuschange
AT seamongwen northcarolinapharmacistssupportforhormonalcontraceptionprescriptionstatuschange
AT scottmollieashe northcarolinapharmacistssupportforhormonalcontraceptionprescriptionstatuschange
AT takcaseyr northcarolinapharmacistssupportforhormonalcontraceptionprescriptionstatuschange