Cargando…

Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching

Research in attention and action control produced substantial evidence suggesting the presence of feature binding. This study explores the binding of task-irrelevant context features in cued task switching. We predicted that repeating a context feature in trial n retrieves the trial n − 1 episode. C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benini, Elena, Koch, Iring, Mayr, Susanne, Frings, Christian, Philipp, Andrea M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36112986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218221128546
_version_ 1785074189058703360
author Benini, Elena
Koch, Iring
Mayr, Susanne
Frings, Christian
Philipp, Andrea M.
author_facet Benini, Elena
Koch, Iring
Mayr, Susanne
Frings, Christian
Philipp, Andrea M.
author_sort Benini, Elena
collection PubMed
description Research in attention and action control produced substantial evidence suggesting the presence of feature binding. This study explores the binding of task-irrelevant context features in cued task switching. We predicted that repeating a context feature in trial n retrieves the trial n − 1 episode. Consequently, performance should improve when the retrieved features match the features of the current trial. Two experiments (N = 124; N = 96) employing different tasks and materials showed that repeating the task-irrelevant context improved performance when the task and the response repeated. Furthermore, repeating the task-irrelevant context increased task repetition benefits only when the context feature appeared synchronously with cue onset, but not when the context feature appeared with a 300-ms delay (Experiment 1). Similarly, repeating the task-irrelevant context improved performance when the task and the response repeated only when the context feature was part of the cue, and not when it was part of the target (Experiment 2). Taken together, binding and retrieval processes seem to play a crucial role in task switching, alongside response inhibition processes. In turn, our study provided a better understanding of binding and retrieval of task-irrelevant features in general, and specifically on how they modulate response repetition benefits in task repetitions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10350694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103506942023-07-18 Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching Benini, Elena Koch, Iring Mayr, Susanne Frings, Christian Philipp, Andrea M. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) Original Articles Research in attention and action control produced substantial evidence suggesting the presence of feature binding. This study explores the binding of task-irrelevant context features in cued task switching. We predicted that repeating a context feature in trial n retrieves the trial n − 1 episode. Consequently, performance should improve when the retrieved features match the features of the current trial. Two experiments (N = 124; N = 96) employing different tasks and materials showed that repeating the task-irrelevant context improved performance when the task and the response repeated. Furthermore, repeating the task-irrelevant context increased task repetition benefits only when the context feature appeared synchronously with cue onset, but not when the context feature appeared with a 300-ms delay (Experiment 1). Similarly, repeating the task-irrelevant context improved performance when the task and the response repeated only when the context feature was part of the cue, and not when it was part of the target (Experiment 2). Taken together, binding and retrieval processes seem to play a crucial role in task switching, alongside response inhibition processes. In turn, our study provided a better understanding of binding and retrieval of task-irrelevant features in general, and specifically on how they modulate response repetition benefits in task repetitions. SAGE Publications 2022-10-27 2023-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10350694/ /pubmed/36112986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218221128546 Text en © Experimental Psychology Society 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Benini, Elena
Koch, Iring
Mayr, Susanne
Frings, Christian
Philipp, Andrea M.
Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching
title Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching
title_full Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching
title_fullStr Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching
title_full_unstemmed Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching
title_short Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching
title_sort binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36112986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218221128546
work_keys_str_mv AT beninielena bindingoftaskirrelevantcontextualfeaturesintaskswitching
AT kochiring bindingoftaskirrelevantcontextualfeaturesintaskswitching
AT mayrsusanne bindingoftaskirrelevantcontextualfeaturesintaskswitching
AT fringschristian bindingoftaskirrelevantcontextualfeaturesintaskswitching
AT philippandream bindingoftaskirrelevantcontextualfeaturesintaskswitching