Cargando…
Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching
Research in attention and action control produced substantial evidence suggesting the presence of feature binding. This study explores the binding of task-irrelevant context features in cued task switching. We predicted that repeating a context feature in trial n retrieves the trial n − 1 episode. C...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36112986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218221128546 |
_version_ | 1785074189058703360 |
---|---|
author | Benini, Elena Koch, Iring Mayr, Susanne Frings, Christian Philipp, Andrea M. |
author_facet | Benini, Elena Koch, Iring Mayr, Susanne Frings, Christian Philipp, Andrea M. |
author_sort | Benini, Elena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Research in attention and action control produced substantial evidence suggesting the presence of feature binding. This study explores the binding of task-irrelevant context features in cued task switching. We predicted that repeating a context feature in trial n retrieves the trial n − 1 episode. Consequently, performance should improve when the retrieved features match the features of the current trial. Two experiments (N = 124; N = 96) employing different tasks and materials showed that repeating the task-irrelevant context improved performance when the task and the response repeated. Furthermore, repeating the task-irrelevant context increased task repetition benefits only when the context feature appeared synchronously with cue onset, but not when the context feature appeared with a 300-ms delay (Experiment 1). Similarly, repeating the task-irrelevant context improved performance when the task and the response repeated only when the context feature was part of the cue, and not when it was part of the target (Experiment 2). Taken together, binding and retrieval processes seem to play a crucial role in task switching, alongside response inhibition processes. In turn, our study provided a better understanding of binding and retrieval of task-irrelevant features in general, and specifically on how they modulate response repetition benefits in task repetitions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10350694 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103506942023-07-18 Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching Benini, Elena Koch, Iring Mayr, Susanne Frings, Christian Philipp, Andrea M. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) Original Articles Research in attention and action control produced substantial evidence suggesting the presence of feature binding. This study explores the binding of task-irrelevant context features in cued task switching. We predicted that repeating a context feature in trial n retrieves the trial n − 1 episode. Consequently, performance should improve when the retrieved features match the features of the current trial. Two experiments (N = 124; N = 96) employing different tasks and materials showed that repeating the task-irrelevant context improved performance when the task and the response repeated. Furthermore, repeating the task-irrelevant context increased task repetition benefits only when the context feature appeared synchronously with cue onset, but not when the context feature appeared with a 300-ms delay (Experiment 1). Similarly, repeating the task-irrelevant context improved performance when the task and the response repeated only when the context feature was part of the cue, and not when it was part of the target (Experiment 2). Taken together, binding and retrieval processes seem to play a crucial role in task switching, alongside response inhibition processes. In turn, our study provided a better understanding of binding and retrieval of task-irrelevant features in general, and specifically on how they modulate response repetition benefits in task repetitions. SAGE Publications 2022-10-27 2023-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10350694/ /pubmed/36112986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218221128546 Text en © Experimental Psychology Society 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Benini, Elena Koch, Iring Mayr, Susanne Frings, Christian Philipp, Andrea M. Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching |
title | Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching |
title_full | Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching |
title_fullStr | Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching |
title_full_unstemmed | Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching |
title_short | Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching |
title_sort | binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36112986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218221128546 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beninielena bindingoftaskirrelevantcontextualfeaturesintaskswitching AT kochiring bindingoftaskirrelevantcontextualfeaturesintaskswitching AT mayrsusanne bindingoftaskirrelevantcontextualfeaturesintaskswitching AT fringschristian bindingoftaskirrelevantcontextualfeaturesintaskswitching AT philippandream bindingoftaskirrelevantcontextualfeaturesintaskswitching |