Urethral rupture concomitant with penile fracture does not adversely affect functional outcomes

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to identify possible risk factors for urethral rupture and to evaluate the effect of urethral rupture repair on long-term functional outcomes and complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of consecutive penile fracture patients were retrospectively reviewed. Penile fracture patients with and without urethral rupture were compared according to demographics, clinical and intraoperative findings. Comparisons of postoperative functional results of the groups were performed using the 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Finally, among them, long-term penile complications including penile curvature, painful erection, palpable nodule, and paresthesia were assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients participated. Patients with urethral rupture (n = 8) were older (44.50 ± 10.69, 36.58 ± 10.33 years, p = 0.052). There was no significant difference in fracture etiology (p = 0.64). Urethral bleeding was present only in patients with urethral rupture (p < 0.001). Although no bilateral corpus cavernosum rupture was encountered in penile fracture patients without urethral rupture, this rate was significantly higher in those with urethral rupture at a rate of 62.5% (p < 0.001). The time from surgical repair to sexual activity was similar in both groups (p = 0.66). There was no significant difference in IPSS and IIEF-5 scores, the presence of erectile dysfunction and complication rates (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Older age is a possible risk factor for a concomitant urethral rupture with penile fracture and it seems to be associated with urethral bleeding and bilateral corpus cavernosum involvement. Additionally, urethral rupture repair neither adversely affected functional outcomes nor increased penile complication rates.