Cargando…
State-of-art review of current malleable penile prosthesis devices in the commercial market
The malleable penile implant is often considered an inferior device to the three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implant. Nonetheless, the malleable prosthesis has its unique advantages such as lower cost, easier to perform and fewer mechanical complications than inflatable prostheses. Furthermor...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350748/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37465318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872231179008 |
_version_ | 1785074211628253184 |
---|---|
author | Chung, Eric Wang, Juan |
author_facet | Chung, Eric Wang, Juan |
author_sort | Chung, Eric |
collection | PubMed |
description | The malleable penile implant is often considered an inferior device to the three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implant. Nonetheless, the malleable prosthesis has its unique advantages such as lower cost, easier to perform and fewer mechanical complications than inflatable prostheses. Furthermore, its role can be extended to patients with issues relating to poor manual hand dexterity, those undergoing a salvage for infection prosthesis and as an emergency surgical measure in patients presenting with acute ischaemic priapism. Over the past few decades, there have been numerous design and technological advancements to improve overall clinical efficacy, mechanical durability, axial rigidity and device concealability of malleable penile prostheses. The following article provides a narrative review of the six major contemporary malleable penile prosthesis devices in the commercial market, namely, the Coloplast Genesis prosthesis, the Boston Scientific Tactra prosthesis, the Zephyr ZSI 100 and 100 (female-to-male) FTM devices, the Rigi10 prosthesis, the TUBE malleable prosthesis and the Shah prosthesis and evaluates the published outcomes. Appropriate patient selection and strict counselling regarding what to expect with malleable prostheses coupled with adherence to safe surgical principles are paramount to ensure excellent clinical success and patient satisfaction rates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10350748 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103507482023-07-18 State-of-art review of current malleable penile prosthesis devices in the commercial market Chung, Eric Wang, Juan Ther Adv Urol Review Article The malleable penile implant is often considered an inferior device to the three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implant. Nonetheless, the malleable prosthesis has its unique advantages such as lower cost, easier to perform and fewer mechanical complications than inflatable prostheses. Furthermore, its role can be extended to patients with issues relating to poor manual hand dexterity, those undergoing a salvage for infection prosthesis and as an emergency surgical measure in patients presenting with acute ischaemic priapism. Over the past few decades, there have been numerous design and technological advancements to improve overall clinical efficacy, mechanical durability, axial rigidity and device concealability of malleable penile prostheses. The following article provides a narrative review of the six major contemporary malleable penile prosthesis devices in the commercial market, namely, the Coloplast Genesis prosthesis, the Boston Scientific Tactra prosthesis, the Zephyr ZSI 100 and 100 (female-to-male) FTM devices, the Rigi10 prosthesis, the TUBE malleable prosthesis and the Shah prosthesis and evaluates the published outcomes. Appropriate patient selection and strict counselling regarding what to expect with malleable prostheses coupled with adherence to safe surgical principles are paramount to ensure excellent clinical success and patient satisfaction rates. SAGE Publications 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10350748/ /pubmed/37465318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872231179008 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Chung, Eric Wang, Juan State-of-art review of current malleable penile prosthesis devices in the commercial market |
title | State-of-art review of current malleable penile prosthesis devices in the commercial market |
title_full | State-of-art review of current malleable penile prosthesis devices in the commercial market |
title_fullStr | State-of-art review of current malleable penile prosthesis devices in the commercial market |
title_full_unstemmed | State-of-art review of current malleable penile prosthesis devices in the commercial market |
title_short | State-of-art review of current malleable penile prosthesis devices in the commercial market |
title_sort | state-of-art review of current malleable penile prosthesis devices in the commercial market |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350748/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37465318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872231179008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chungeric stateofartreviewofcurrentmalleablepenileprosthesisdevicesinthecommercialmarket AT wangjuan stateofartreviewofcurrentmalleablepenileprosthesisdevicesinthecommercialmarket |