Cargando…

Inter-Rater Reliability of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Assessment on Wide-Field OCT-Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography

PURPOSE: To assess inter-rater reliability in the detection of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) changes using wide-field optical coherence tomography angiography (WF-OCTA) versus fluorescein angiography (FA). METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional study included patients with severe no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shah, Payal N., Mishra, Divyansh K., Falahat, Peyman, Fischer, Lars, Guzman, Gabriela, Terheyden, Jan H., Holz, Frank G., Krohne, Tim U., Finger, Robert P., Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10351024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37432848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.12.7.13
_version_ 1785074253012402176
author Shah, Payal N.
Mishra, Divyansh K.
Falahat, Peyman
Fischer, Lars
Guzman, Gabriela
Terheyden, Jan H.
Holz, Frank G.
Krohne, Tim U.
Finger, Robert P.
Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M.
author_facet Shah, Payal N.
Mishra, Divyansh K.
Falahat, Peyman
Fischer, Lars
Guzman, Gabriela
Terheyden, Jan H.
Holz, Frank G.
Krohne, Tim U.
Finger, Robert P.
Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M.
author_sort Shah, Payal N.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess inter-rater reliability in the detection of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) changes using wide-field optical coherence tomography angiography (WF-OCTA) versus fluorescein angiography (FA). METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional study included patients with severe nonproliferative and PDR. Images were acquired with 12 × 12 mm WF-OCTA and FA with a 55° lens. Images were cropped to represent the exact same field of view. Qualitative (detection of neovascularization at the disc [NVD] and elsewhere [NVE], enlarged foveal avascular zone [FAZ], vitreous hemorrhage [VH]) and quantitative analyses (FAZ area, horizontal, vertical, and maximum FAZ diameter) were performed by 2 masked graders using ImageJ. Inter-rater reliability was calculated using unweighted Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) for qualitative analyses and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for quantitative analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-three eyes of 17 patients were included. Inter-rater reliability was higher for FA than for WF-OCTA in qualitative analyses: κ values were 0.65 and 0.78 for detection of extended FAZ, 0.83 and 1.0 for NVD, 0.78 and 1.0 for NVE, and 0.19 and 1 for VH for WF-OCTA and FA, respectively. In contrast, inter-rater reliability was higher for WF-OCTA than for FA in the quantitative analyses: ICC values were 0.94 and 0.76 for FAZ size, 0.92 and 0.79 for horizontal FAZ diameter, 0.82 and 0.72 for vertical FAZ diameter, and 0.88 and 0.82 for maximum FAZ diameter on WF-OCTA and FA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Inter-rater reliability of FA is superior to WF-OCTA for qualitative analyses whereas inter-rater reliability of WF-OCTA is superior to FA for quantitative analyses. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The study highlights the specific merits of both imaging modalities in terms of reliability. FA should be preferred for qualitative parameters, whereas WF-OCTA should be preferred for quantitative parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10351024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103510242023-07-18 Inter-Rater Reliability of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Assessment on Wide-Field OCT-Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography Shah, Payal N. Mishra, Divyansh K. Falahat, Peyman Fischer, Lars Guzman, Gabriela Terheyden, Jan H. Holz, Frank G. Krohne, Tim U. Finger, Robert P. Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M. Transl Vis Sci Technol Retina PURPOSE: To assess inter-rater reliability in the detection of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) changes using wide-field optical coherence tomography angiography (WF-OCTA) versus fluorescein angiography (FA). METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional study included patients with severe nonproliferative and PDR. Images were acquired with 12 × 12 mm WF-OCTA and FA with a 55° lens. Images were cropped to represent the exact same field of view. Qualitative (detection of neovascularization at the disc [NVD] and elsewhere [NVE], enlarged foveal avascular zone [FAZ], vitreous hemorrhage [VH]) and quantitative analyses (FAZ area, horizontal, vertical, and maximum FAZ diameter) were performed by 2 masked graders using ImageJ. Inter-rater reliability was calculated using unweighted Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) for qualitative analyses and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for quantitative analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-three eyes of 17 patients were included. Inter-rater reliability was higher for FA than for WF-OCTA in qualitative analyses: κ values were 0.65 and 0.78 for detection of extended FAZ, 0.83 and 1.0 for NVD, 0.78 and 1.0 for NVE, and 0.19 and 1 for VH for WF-OCTA and FA, respectively. In contrast, inter-rater reliability was higher for WF-OCTA than for FA in the quantitative analyses: ICC values were 0.94 and 0.76 for FAZ size, 0.92 and 0.79 for horizontal FAZ diameter, 0.82 and 0.72 for vertical FAZ diameter, and 0.88 and 0.82 for maximum FAZ diameter on WF-OCTA and FA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Inter-rater reliability of FA is superior to WF-OCTA for qualitative analyses whereas inter-rater reliability of WF-OCTA is superior to FA for quantitative analyses. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The study highlights the specific merits of both imaging modalities in terms of reliability. FA should be preferred for qualitative parameters, whereas WF-OCTA should be preferred for quantitative parameters. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10351024/ /pubmed/37432848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.12.7.13 Text en Copyright 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Retina
Shah, Payal N.
Mishra, Divyansh K.
Falahat, Peyman
Fischer, Lars
Guzman, Gabriela
Terheyden, Jan H.
Holz, Frank G.
Krohne, Tim U.
Finger, Robert P.
Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M.
Inter-Rater Reliability of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Assessment on Wide-Field OCT-Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography
title Inter-Rater Reliability of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Assessment on Wide-Field OCT-Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography
title_full Inter-Rater Reliability of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Assessment on Wide-Field OCT-Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography
title_fullStr Inter-Rater Reliability of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Assessment on Wide-Field OCT-Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography
title_full_unstemmed Inter-Rater Reliability of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Assessment on Wide-Field OCT-Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography
title_short Inter-Rater Reliability of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Assessment on Wide-Field OCT-Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography
title_sort inter-rater reliability of proliferative diabetic retinopathy assessment on wide-field oct-angiography and fluorescein angiography
topic Retina
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10351024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37432848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.12.7.13
work_keys_str_mv AT shahpayaln interraterreliabilityofproliferativediabeticretinopathyassessmentonwidefieldoctangiographyandfluoresceinangiography
AT mishradivyanshk interraterreliabilityofproliferativediabeticretinopathyassessmentonwidefieldoctangiographyandfluoresceinangiography
AT falahatpeyman interraterreliabilityofproliferativediabeticretinopathyassessmentonwidefieldoctangiographyandfluoresceinangiography
AT fischerlars interraterreliabilityofproliferativediabeticretinopathyassessmentonwidefieldoctangiographyandfluoresceinangiography
AT guzmangabriela interraterreliabilityofproliferativediabeticretinopathyassessmentonwidefieldoctangiographyandfluoresceinangiography
AT terheydenjanh interraterreliabilityofproliferativediabeticretinopathyassessmentonwidefieldoctangiographyandfluoresceinangiography
AT holzfrankg interraterreliabilityofproliferativediabeticretinopathyassessmentonwidefieldoctangiographyandfluoresceinangiography
AT krohnetimu interraterreliabilityofproliferativediabeticretinopathyassessmentonwidefieldoctangiographyandfluoresceinangiography
AT fingerrobertp interraterreliabilityofproliferativediabeticretinopathyassessmentonwidefieldoctangiographyandfluoresceinangiography
AT wintergerstmaximilianwm interraterreliabilityofproliferativediabeticretinopathyassessmentonwidefieldoctangiographyandfluoresceinangiography