Cargando…

Duloxetine for fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: The optimal dose of duloxetine in the management of fibromyalgia remains still controversial. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate efficacy and safety of duloxetine was conducted. The outcomes of interests were to assess changes in Fibromyalgia Impact Questio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Migliorini, Filippo, Maffulli, Nicola, Eschweiler, Jörg, Baroncini, Alice, Bell, Andreas, Colarossi, Giorgia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10351165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37461044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03995-z
_version_ 1785074288861118464
author Migliorini, Filippo
Maffulli, Nicola
Eschweiler, Jörg
Baroncini, Alice
Bell, Andreas
Colarossi, Giorgia
author_facet Migliorini, Filippo
Maffulli, Nicola
Eschweiler, Jörg
Baroncini, Alice
Bell, Andreas
Colarossi, Giorgia
author_sort Migliorini, Filippo
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The optimal dose of duloxetine in the management of fibromyalgia remains still controversial. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate efficacy and safety of duloxetine was conducted. The outcomes of interests were to assess changes in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and Clinical Global Impression (CGI). The rate of of adverse events and those leading to therapy discontinuation were also investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study followed the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. The literature search started in December 2022 accessing PubMed, Google scholar, Embase, and Scopus databases. All the RCTs investigating the efficacy and safety of daily administration of duloxetine for fibromyalgia were accessed. Studies reporting quantitative data under the outcomes of interest, and including a minimum of 10 patients who completed a minimum of 4 weeks follow-up, were included. Studies on combined pharmacological and non-pharmacological managements for fibromyalgia were not considered. RESULTS: Data from 3432 patients (11 RCTs) were included. The mean age of the patients was 46.4 ± 10.7 years old, and the mean BMI 25.3 ± 3.2 kg/m(2). 90% (3089 of 3432 patients) were women. The 60 mg/daily cohort reported the higher FIQ, followed by the 30, 30–60, 120 mg/daily, and placebo groups, while the 60–120 mg /daily group performed the worst results. Concerning the CGI severity scale, placebo resulted in the lowest improvement, and no differences were found in the other groups. Concerning the BPI interference and severity pain scores, the 30–60 mg/daily group reported the worst result, along with the placebo group. The rate of adverse events leading to study discontinuation were lower in the 60–120 group, followed by the 30–60 and 30 mag/daily groups. Duloxetine was superior in all the comparisons to placebo, irrespective of the doses, in all endpoints analysed. CONCLUSIONS: Duloxetine could help in improving symptoms of fibromyalgia. The dose of duloxetine should be customised according to individual patients. Irrespective of the doses, duloxetine was more effective than placebo in the management of fibromyalgia. The dose of duloxetine must be customised according to individual patients. Level of evidence I Meta-analysis of double-blind RCTs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10351165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103511652023-07-18 Duloxetine for fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis Migliorini, Filippo Maffulli, Nicola Eschweiler, Jörg Baroncini, Alice Bell, Andreas Colarossi, Giorgia J Orthop Surg Res Systematic Review INTRODUCTION: The optimal dose of duloxetine in the management of fibromyalgia remains still controversial. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate efficacy and safety of duloxetine was conducted. The outcomes of interests were to assess changes in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and Clinical Global Impression (CGI). The rate of of adverse events and those leading to therapy discontinuation were also investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study followed the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. The literature search started in December 2022 accessing PubMed, Google scholar, Embase, and Scopus databases. All the RCTs investigating the efficacy and safety of daily administration of duloxetine for fibromyalgia were accessed. Studies reporting quantitative data under the outcomes of interest, and including a minimum of 10 patients who completed a minimum of 4 weeks follow-up, were included. Studies on combined pharmacological and non-pharmacological managements for fibromyalgia were not considered. RESULTS: Data from 3432 patients (11 RCTs) were included. The mean age of the patients was 46.4 ± 10.7 years old, and the mean BMI 25.3 ± 3.2 kg/m(2). 90% (3089 of 3432 patients) were women. The 60 mg/daily cohort reported the higher FIQ, followed by the 30, 30–60, 120 mg/daily, and placebo groups, while the 60–120 mg /daily group performed the worst results. Concerning the CGI severity scale, placebo resulted in the lowest improvement, and no differences were found in the other groups. Concerning the BPI interference and severity pain scores, the 30–60 mg/daily group reported the worst result, along with the placebo group. The rate of adverse events leading to study discontinuation were lower in the 60–120 group, followed by the 30–60 and 30 mag/daily groups. Duloxetine was superior in all the comparisons to placebo, irrespective of the doses, in all endpoints analysed. CONCLUSIONS: Duloxetine could help in improving symptoms of fibromyalgia. The dose of duloxetine should be customised according to individual patients. Irrespective of the doses, duloxetine was more effective than placebo in the management of fibromyalgia. The dose of duloxetine must be customised according to individual patients. Level of evidence I Meta-analysis of double-blind RCTs. BioMed Central 2023-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10351165/ /pubmed/37461044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03995-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Migliorini, Filippo
Maffulli, Nicola
Eschweiler, Jörg
Baroncini, Alice
Bell, Andreas
Colarossi, Giorgia
Duloxetine for fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Duloxetine for fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Duloxetine for fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Duloxetine for fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Duloxetine for fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Duloxetine for fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort duloxetine for fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10351165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37461044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03995-z
work_keys_str_mv AT migliorinifilippo duloxetineforfibromyalgiasyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maffullinicola duloxetineforfibromyalgiasyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT eschweilerjorg duloxetineforfibromyalgiasyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baroncinialice duloxetineforfibromyalgiasyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bellandreas duloxetineforfibromyalgiasyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT colarossigiorgia duloxetineforfibromyalgiasyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis