Cargando…

Effect of neurosurgical high observation beds (HOBs) on service provision: a single-centre experience and cost analysis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of level 1, high observation beds (HOBs) compared with high dependency unit (HDU) and neurosurgical intensive care unit (NICU) admission on service provision, such as cancelled operations, and healthcare costs. METHODS: A retrospective, observational, single-centre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crispi, Vassili, Bolton, William, Town, Rebecca, Anderson, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10351255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37451723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073461
_version_ 1785074304783745024
author Crispi, Vassili
Bolton, William
Town, Rebecca
Anderson, Ian
author_facet Crispi, Vassili
Bolton, William
Town, Rebecca
Anderson, Ian
author_sort Crispi, Vassili
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of level 1, high observation beds (HOBs) compared with high dependency unit (HDU) and neurosurgical intensive care unit (NICU) admission on service provision, such as cancelled operations, and healthcare costs. METHODS: A retrospective, observational, single-centre cross-sectional study at a single, large UK neurosurgical centre. All adult patients admitted to neurosurgical HOBs between December 2021 and July 2022 were included. The list of cancelled procedures was collected from 2019 to 2022. To evaluate the impact of admission of eligible patients to HOBs, the total bed days, cost per bed day, number of admissions and cost per admission were obtained for all clinical areas the financial years 2019/2020 and 2021/2022. RESULTS: 307 patients were included in the study: 59.7% of HOBs admissions were elective and 37.7% were acute; admissions were for cranial procedures or conservative treatment (64.8%), spinal (32.6%) or other (2.6%). Following admission, 73.3% of patients were stepped down to the ward prior to discharge home. Only seven patients required escalation to level-2 or level-3 care. Overall, 97% of all HOBs patients were discharged home at the end of hospital stay. Occupancy rate was 90.4%. The cost of bed day increased from ward, level 0 (£384), then level 1 (£376), to level 2 (£787–1211) and to level 3 (£1628). From 2019 to 2021, 558 operations had been cancelled, and 140 (37.8%) of 370 were estimated to have been potentially avoided by HOBs admissions due to conflict of scheduling, ward bed capacity and critical care bed capacity. In addition, a minimum total expenditure due to cancelled operations was estimated at £22 923.50 yearly on average. CONCLUSION: This study recognises HOBs growing role in the management of acutely unwell patients in ward-based environments. While recognising the associated challenges, this study highlighted the potential in reducing healthcare costs. Further studies should evaluate the impact and limitations of HOBs on patients’ recovery and outcomes, compared to HDU and NICU.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10351255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103512552023-07-18 Effect of neurosurgical high observation beds (HOBs) on service provision: a single-centre experience and cost analysis Crispi, Vassili Bolton, William Town, Rebecca Anderson, Ian BMJ Open Surgery OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of level 1, high observation beds (HOBs) compared with high dependency unit (HDU) and neurosurgical intensive care unit (NICU) admission on service provision, such as cancelled operations, and healthcare costs. METHODS: A retrospective, observational, single-centre cross-sectional study at a single, large UK neurosurgical centre. All adult patients admitted to neurosurgical HOBs between December 2021 and July 2022 were included. The list of cancelled procedures was collected from 2019 to 2022. To evaluate the impact of admission of eligible patients to HOBs, the total bed days, cost per bed day, number of admissions and cost per admission were obtained for all clinical areas the financial years 2019/2020 and 2021/2022. RESULTS: 307 patients were included in the study: 59.7% of HOBs admissions were elective and 37.7% were acute; admissions were for cranial procedures or conservative treatment (64.8%), spinal (32.6%) or other (2.6%). Following admission, 73.3% of patients were stepped down to the ward prior to discharge home. Only seven patients required escalation to level-2 or level-3 care. Overall, 97% of all HOBs patients were discharged home at the end of hospital stay. Occupancy rate was 90.4%. The cost of bed day increased from ward, level 0 (£384), then level 1 (£376), to level 2 (£787–1211) and to level 3 (£1628). From 2019 to 2021, 558 operations had been cancelled, and 140 (37.8%) of 370 were estimated to have been potentially avoided by HOBs admissions due to conflict of scheduling, ward bed capacity and critical care bed capacity. In addition, a minimum total expenditure due to cancelled operations was estimated at £22 923.50 yearly on average. CONCLUSION: This study recognises HOBs growing role in the management of acutely unwell patients in ward-based environments. While recognising the associated challenges, this study highlighted the potential in reducing healthcare costs. Further studies should evaluate the impact and limitations of HOBs on patients’ recovery and outcomes, compared to HDU and NICU. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10351255/ /pubmed/37451723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073461 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Surgery
Crispi, Vassili
Bolton, William
Town, Rebecca
Anderson, Ian
Effect of neurosurgical high observation beds (HOBs) on service provision: a single-centre experience and cost analysis
title Effect of neurosurgical high observation beds (HOBs) on service provision: a single-centre experience and cost analysis
title_full Effect of neurosurgical high observation beds (HOBs) on service provision: a single-centre experience and cost analysis
title_fullStr Effect of neurosurgical high observation beds (HOBs) on service provision: a single-centre experience and cost analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of neurosurgical high observation beds (HOBs) on service provision: a single-centre experience and cost analysis
title_short Effect of neurosurgical high observation beds (HOBs) on service provision: a single-centre experience and cost analysis
title_sort effect of neurosurgical high observation beds (hobs) on service provision: a single-centre experience and cost analysis
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10351255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37451723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073461
work_keys_str_mv AT crispivassili effectofneurosurgicalhighobservationbedshobsonserviceprovisionasinglecentreexperienceandcostanalysis
AT boltonwilliam effectofneurosurgicalhighobservationbedshobsonserviceprovisionasinglecentreexperienceandcostanalysis
AT townrebecca effectofneurosurgicalhighobservationbedshobsonserviceprovisionasinglecentreexperienceandcostanalysis
AT andersonian effectofneurosurgicalhighobservationbedshobsonserviceprovisionasinglecentreexperienceandcostanalysis