Cargando…

Cohort analysis of child abuse and neglect cases treated during the initial 2 years of a programme to support hospital-based child protection work in Austria

OBJECTIVE: To describe characteristics of suspected child abuse and neglect (CAN) cases associated with the decision of paediatric departments (PDs) in Vienna, Austria, to involve services of a regional tertiary child protection service programme (Forensische Kinder- und JugendUntersuchungsStelle, F...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mora-Theuer, Eva Anna, Klomfar, Sophie, Ramazanova, Dariga, Grylli, Chryssa, Kletecka-Pulker, Maria, Völkl-Kernstock, Sabine, Otterman, Gabriel, Simon, Judit, Greber-Platzer, Susanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10351272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37451739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071536
_version_ 1785074309239144448
author Mora-Theuer, Eva Anna
Klomfar, Sophie
Ramazanova, Dariga
Grylli, Chryssa
Kletecka-Pulker, Maria
Völkl-Kernstock, Sabine
Otterman, Gabriel
Simon, Judit
Greber-Platzer, Susanne
author_facet Mora-Theuer, Eva Anna
Klomfar, Sophie
Ramazanova, Dariga
Grylli, Chryssa
Kletecka-Pulker, Maria
Völkl-Kernstock, Sabine
Otterman, Gabriel
Simon, Judit
Greber-Platzer, Susanne
author_sort Mora-Theuer, Eva Anna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To describe characteristics of suspected child abuse and neglect (CAN) cases associated with the decision of paediatric departments (PDs) in Vienna, Austria, to involve services of a regional tertiary child protection service programme (Forensische Kinder- und JugendUntersuchungsStelle, FOKUS). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis of a regional data collection of CAN cases over the first 2 years of FOKUS’s operational period (1 July 2015–30 June 2017). SETTING: All CAN cases reported to the PDs of six public hospitals in Vienna. Five of these public hospitals were secondary heath care centres and one was a tertiary healthcare centre. RESULTS: Overall, 231 cases (59.1%) were treated without and 160 (40.9%) with additional involvement of the FOKUS service programme. The odds of a case to be treated without FOKUS involvement were higher if neglect was suspected (OR 3.233, 95% CI 2.024 to 5.279). In contrast, when sexual abuse was suspected, the odds for involvement with FOKUS were significantly higher (OR 7.577, 95% CI 4.580 to 12.879). The odds of being managed with FOKUS services nearly doubled when multiple forms of abuse were suspected (OR 1.926, 95% CI 1.136 to 3.285). The odds for additional FOKUS involvement were significantly lower for patients treated as inpatients (OR 0.239, 95% CI 0.151 to 0.373). CAN patients managed with FOKUS involvement were significantly more often reported to law enforcement (LE) (OR 3.234, 95% CI 2.078 to 5.002). Concurrently, suspected sexual abuse cases and cases reported to LE were more frequently treated in the PD of the tertiary centre than in other PDs (χ(2) p<0.001). CONCLUSION: CAN case characteristics significantly influenced if PDs involved a tertiary child protection programme. Suspected sexual abuse, if more than one form of CAN was suspected and cases reported to LE required additional specialist expertise. For suspected neglect involvement of tertiary services seemed less important.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10351272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103512722023-07-18 Cohort analysis of child abuse and neglect cases treated during the initial 2 years of a programme to support hospital-based child protection work in Austria Mora-Theuer, Eva Anna Klomfar, Sophie Ramazanova, Dariga Grylli, Chryssa Kletecka-Pulker, Maria Völkl-Kernstock, Sabine Otterman, Gabriel Simon, Judit Greber-Platzer, Susanne BMJ Open Paediatrics OBJECTIVE: To describe characteristics of suspected child abuse and neglect (CAN) cases associated with the decision of paediatric departments (PDs) in Vienna, Austria, to involve services of a regional tertiary child protection service programme (Forensische Kinder- und JugendUntersuchungsStelle, FOKUS). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis of a regional data collection of CAN cases over the first 2 years of FOKUS’s operational period (1 July 2015–30 June 2017). SETTING: All CAN cases reported to the PDs of six public hospitals in Vienna. Five of these public hospitals were secondary heath care centres and one was a tertiary healthcare centre. RESULTS: Overall, 231 cases (59.1%) were treated without and 160 (40.9%) with additional involvement of the FOKUS service programme. The odds of a case to be treated without FOKUS involvement were higher if neglect was suspected (OR 3.233, 95% CI 2.024 to 5.279). In contrast, when sexual abuse was suspected, the odds for involvement with FOKUS were significantly higher (OR 7.577, 95% CI 4.580 to 12.879). The odds of being managed with FOKUS services nearly doubled when multiple forms of abuse were suspected (OR 1.926, 95% CI 1.136 to 3.285). The odds for additional FOKUS involvement were significantly lower for patients treated as inpatients (OR 0.239, 95% CI 0.151 to 0.373). CAN patients managed with FOKUS involvement were significantly more often reported to law enforcement (LE) (OR 3.234, 95% CI 2.078 to 5.002). Concurrently, suspected sexual abuse cases and cases reported to LE were more frequently treated in the PD of the tertiary centre than in other PDs (χ(2) p<0.001). CONCLUSION: CAN case characteristics significantly influenced if PDs involved a tertiary child protection programme. Suspected sexual abuse, if more than one form of CAN was suspected and cases reported to LE required additional specialist expertise. For suspected neglect involvement of tertiary services seemed less important. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10351272/ /pubmed/37451739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071536 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Paediatrics
Mora-Theuer, Eva Anna
Klomfar, Sophie
Ramazanova, Dariga
Grylli, Chryssa
Kletecka-Pulker, Maria
Völkl-Kernstock, Sabine
Otterman, Gabriel
Simon, Judit
Greber-Platzer, Susanne
Cohort analysis of child abuse and neglect cases treated during the initial 2 years of a programme to support hospital-based child protection work in Austria
title Cohort analysis of child abuse and neglect cases treated during the initial 2 years of a programme to support hospital-based child protection work in Austria
title_full Cohort analysis of child abuse and neglect cases treated during the initial 2 years of a programme to support hospital-based child protection work in Austria
title_fullStr Cohort analysis of child abuse and neglect cases treated during the initial 2 years of a programme to support hospital-based child protection work in Austria
title_full_unstemmed Cohort analysis of child abuse and neglect cases treated during the initial 2 years of a programme to support hospital-based child protection work in Austria
title_short Cohort analysis of child abuse and neglect cases treated during the initial 2 years of a programme to support hospital-based child protection work in Austria
title_sort cohort analysis of child abuse and neglect cases treated during the initial 2 years of a programme to support hospital-based child protection work in austria
topic Paediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10351272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37451739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071536
work_keys_str_mv AT moratheuerevaanna cohortanalysisofchildabuseandneglectcasestreatedduringtheinitial2yearsofaprogrammetosupporthospitalbasedchildprotectionworkinaustria
AT klomfarsophie cohortanalysisofchildabuseandneglectcasestreatedduringtheinitial2yearsofaprogrammetosupporthospitalbasedchildprotectionworkinaustria
AT ramazanovadariga cohortanalysisofchildabuseandneglectcasestreatedduringtheinitial2yearsofaprogrammetosupporthospitalbasedchildprotectionworkinaustria
AT gryllichryssa cohortanalysisofchildabuseandneglectcasestreatedduringtheinitial2yearsofaprogrammetosupporthospitalbasedchildprotectionworkinaustria
AT kleteckapulkermaria cohortanalysisofchildabuseandneglectcasestreatedduringtheinitial2yearsofaprogrammetosupporthospitalbasedchildprotectionworkinaustria
AT volklkernstocksabine cohortanalysisofchildabuseandneglectcasestreatedduringtheinitial2yearsofaprogrammetosupporthospitalbasedchildprotectionworkinaustria
AT ottermangabriel cohortanalysisofchildabuseandneglectcasestreatedduringtheinitial2yearsofaprogrammetosupporthospitalbasedchildprotectionworkinaustria
AT simonjudit cohortanalysisofchildabuseandneglectcasestreatedduringtheinitial2yearsofaprogrammetosupporthospitalbasedchildprotectionworkinaustria
AT greberplatzersusanne cohortanalysisofchildabuseandneglectcasestreatedduringtheinitial2yearsofaprogrammetosupporthospitalbasedchildprotectionworkinaustria