Cargando…
Acceptability for the influenza virus vector COVID-19 vaccine for intranasal spray: A cross-sectional survey in Beijing, China
The intranasal spray COVID-19 vaccine was made available for the first time in China, it is necessary to understand receivers’ satisfaction and experience toward the vaccine to help optimize vaccination service. A self-administered multicenter cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted in Be...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10351447/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37450312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2023.2235963 |
_version_ | 1785074337922940928 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Yuan Li, Juan Cao, Yanlin Li, Wei Shi, Rujing Jia, Bin Wang, Haihong Yan, Le Suo, Luodan Yang, Weizhong Wu, Jiang Feng, Luzhao |
author_facet | Ma, Yuan Li, Juan Cao, Yanlin Li, Wei Shi, Rujing Jia, Bin Wang, Haihong Yan, Le Suo, Luodan Yang, Weizhong Wu, Jiang Feng, Luzhao |
author_sort | Ma, Yuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The intranasal spray COVID-19 vaccine was made available for the first time in China, it is necessary to understand receivers’ satisfaction and experience toward the vaccine to help optimize vaccination service. A self-administered multicenter cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted in Beijing, China, in December 2022. The vaccination experience was evaluated through three dimensions: immediate tolerance, smooth progress, and time-saving. Vaccine acceptability was measured by receivers’ preference for the intranasal spray over intramuscular injection after vaccination and their recommendation willingness. Stepwise multinomial and binary logistic regression models were applied to investigate factors associated with vaccine acceptability. Among 10,452 participants included in the analysis, 92.6% felt no discomfort during the inoculation, 99.8% thought the vaccination process went well, and 89.4% deemed it a time-saving option. For vaccine acceptability, 5566 (53.3%) participants were willing to recommend the vaccine to others, 534 (5.1%) refused, and 4352 (41.6%) had not decided yet; 6142 (58.8%) participants preferred the intranasal spray, 873 (8.4%) preferred the intramuscular injection, and 3437 (32.9%) had no preferences. The most concerned aspects of the intranasal spray vaccine were vaccine effectiveness and safety. Receivers who perceived higher vaccine effectiveness or safety were more likely to recommend it to others (OR, 95%CI: 4.41, 3.24–6.00; 6.11, 4.52–8.27) or prefer it over intramuscular injection after vaccination (OR, 95%CI: 5.94, 4.62–7.65; 8.50, 6.70–10.78). Receivers showed good acceptability and experience toward the intranasal spray COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccine effectiveness and safety were the most concerned aspects, and corresponding publicity and education efforts may help improve vaccine acceptability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10351447 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103514472023-07-18 Acceptability for the influenza virus vector COVID-19 vaccine for intranasal spray: A cross-sectional survey in Beijing, China Ma, Yuan Li, Juan Cao, Yanlin Li, Wei Shi, Rujing Jia, Bin Wang, Haihong Yan, Le Suo, Luodan Yang, Weizhong Wu, Jiang Feng, Luzhao Hum Vaccin Immunother Novel Vaccines The intranasal spray COVID-19 vaccine was made available for the first time in China, it is necessary to understand receivers’ satisfaction and experience toward the vaccine to help optimize vaccination service. A self-administered multicenter cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted in Beijing, China, in December 2022. The vaccination experience was evaluated through three dimensions: immediate tolerance, smooth progress, and time-saving. Vaccine acceptability was measured by receivers’ preference for the intranasal spray over intramuscular injection after vaccination and their recommendation willingness. Stepwise multinomial and binary logistic regression models were applied to investigate factors associated with vaccine acceptability. Among 10,452 participants included in the analysis, 92.6% felt no discomfort during the inoculation, 99.8% thought the vaccination process went well, and 89.4% deemed it a time-saving option. For vaccine acceptability, 5566 (53.3%) participants were willing to recommend the vaccine to others, 534 (5.1%) refused, and 4352 (41.6%) had not decided yet; 6142 (58.8%) participants preferred the intranasal spray, 873 (8.4%) preferred the intramuscular injection, and 3437 (32.9%) had no preferences. The most concerned aspects of the intranasal spray vaccine were vaccine effectiveness and safety. Receivers who perceived higher vaccine effectiveness or safety were more likely to recommend it to others (OR, 95%CI: 4.41, 3.24–6.00; 6.11, 4.52–8.27) or prefer it over intramuscular injection after vaccination (OR, 95%CI: 5.94, 4.62–7.65; 8.50, 6.70–10.78). Receivers showed good acceptability and experience toward the intranasal spray COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccine effectiveness and safety were the most concerned aspects, and corresponding publicity and education efforts may help improve vaccine acceptability. Taylor & Francis 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10351447/ /pubmed/37450312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2023.2235963 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent. |
spellingShingle | Novel Vaccines Ma, Yuan Li, Juan Cao, Yanlin Li, Wei Shi, Rujing Jia, Bin Wang, Haihong Yan, Le Suo, Luodan Yang, Weizhong Wu, Jiang Feng, Luzhao Acceptability for the influenza virus vector COVID-19 vaccine for intranasal spray: A cross-sectional survey in Beijing, China |
title | Acceptability for the influenza virus vector COVID-19 vaccine for intranasal spray: A cross-sectional survey in Beijing, China |
title_full | Acceptability for the influenza virus vector COVID-19 vaccine for intranasal spray: A cross-sectional survey in Beijing, China |
title_fullStr | Acceptability for the influenza virus vector COVID-19 vaccine for intranasal spray: A cross-sectional survey in Beijing, China |
title_full_unstemmed | Acceptability for the influenza virus vector COVID-19 vaccine for intranasal spray: A cross-sectional survey in Beijing, China |
title_short | Acceptability for the influenza virus vector COVID-19 vaccine for intranasal spray: A cross-sectional survey in Beijing, China |
title_sort | acceptability for the influenza virus vector covid-19 vaccine for intranasal spray: a cross-sectional survey in beijing, china |
topic | Novel Vaccines |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10351447/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37450312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2023.2235963 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mayuan acceptabilityfortheinfluenzavirusvectorcovid19vaccineforintranasalsprayacrosssectionalsurveyinbeijingchina AT lijuan acceptabilityfortheinfluenzavirusvectorcovid19vaccineforintranasalsprayacrosssectionalsurveyinbeijingchina AT caoyanlin acceptabilityfortheinfluenzavirusvectorcovid19vaccineforintranasalsprayacrosssectionalsurveyinbeijingchina AT liwei acceptabilityfortheinfluenzavirusvectorcovid19vaccineforintranasalsprayacrosssectionalsurveyinbeijingchina AT shirujing acceptabilityfortheinfluenzavirusvectorcovid19vaccineforintranasalsprayacrosssectionalsurveyinbeijingchina AT jiabin acceptabilityfortheinfluenzavirusvectorcovid19vaccineforintranasalsprayacrosssectionalsurveyinbeijingchina AT wanghaihong acceptabilityfortheinfluenzavirusvectorcovid19vaccineforintranasalsprayacrosssectionalsurveyinbeijingchina AT yanle acceptabilityfortheinfluenzavirusvectorcovid19vaccineforintranasalsprayacrosssectionalsurveyinbeijingchina AT suoluodan acceptabilityfortheinfluenzavirusvectorcovid19vaccineforintranasalsprayacrosssectionalsurveyinbeijingchina AT yangweizhong acceptabilityfortheinfluenzavirusvectorcovid19vaccineforintranasalsprayacrosssectionalsurveyinbeijingchina AT wujiang acceptabilityfortheinfluenzavirusvectorcovid19vaccineforintranasalsprayacrosssectionalsurveyinbeijingchina AT fengluzhao acceptabilityfortheinfluenzavirusvectorcovid19vaccineforintranasalsprayacrosssectionalsurveyinbeijingchina |