Cargando…

Acceptability for the influenza virus vector COVID-19 vaccine for intranasal spray: A cross-sectional survey in Beijing, China

The intranasal spray COVID-19 vaccine was made available for the first time in China, it is necessary to understand receivers’ satisfaction and experience toward the vaccine to help optimize vaccination service. A self-administered multicenter cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted in Be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Yuan, Li, Juan, Cao, Yanlin, Li, Wei, Shi, Rujing, Jia, Bin, Wang, Haihong, Yan, Le, Suo, Luodan, Yang, Weizhong, Wu, Jiang, Feng, Luzhao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10351447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37450312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2023.2235963
_version_ 1785074337922940928
author Ma, Yuan
Li, Juan
Cao, Yanlin
Li, Wei
Shi, Rujing
Jia, Bin
Wang, Haihong
Yan, Le
Suo, Luodan
Yang, Weizhong
Wu, Jiang
Feng, Luzhao
author_facet Ma, Yuan
Li, Juan
Cao, Yanlin
Li, Wei
Shi, Rujing
Jia, Bin
Wang, Haihong
Yan, Le
Suo, Luodan
Yang, Weizhong
Wu, Jiang
Feng, Luzhao
author_sort Ma, Yuan
collection PubMed
description The intranasal spray COVID-19 vaccine was made available for the first time in China, it is necessary to understand receivers’ satisfaction and experience toward the vaccine to help optimize vaccination service. A self-administered multicenter cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted in Beijing, China, in December 2022. The vaccination experience was evaluated through three dimensions: immediate tolerance, smooth progress, and time-saving. Vaccine acceptability was measured by receivers’ preference for the intranasal spray over intramuscular injection after vaccination and their recommendation willingness. Stepwise multinomial and binary logistic regression models were applied to investigate factors associated with vaccine acceptability. Among 10,452 participants included in the analysis, 92.6% felt no discomfort during the inoculation, 99.8% thought the vaccination process went well, and 89.4% deemed it a time-saving option. For vaccine acceptability, 5566 (53.3%) participants were willing to recommend the vaccine to others, 534 (5.1%) refused, and 4352 (41.6%) had not decided yet; 6142 (58.8%) participants preferred the intranasal spray, 873 (8.4%) preferred the intramuscular injection, and 3437 (32.9%) had no preferences. The most concerned aspects of the intranasal spray vaccine were vaccine effectiveness and safety. Receivers who perceived higher vaccine effectiveness or safety were more likely to recommend it to others (OR, 95%CI: 4.41, 3.24–6.00; 6.11, 4.52–8.27) or prefer it over intramuscular injection after vaccination (OR, 95%CI: 5.94, 4.62–7.65; 8.50, 6.70–10.78). Receivers showed good acceptability and experience toward the intranasal spray COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccine effectiveness and safety were the most concerned aspects, and corresponding publicity and education efforts may help improve vaccine acceptability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10351447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103514472023-07-18 Acceptability for the influenza virus vector COVID-19 vaccine for intranasal spray: A cross-sectional survey in Beijing, China Ma, Yuan Li, Juan Cao, Yanlin Li, Wei Shi, Rujing Jia, Bin Wang, Haihong Yan, Le Suo, Luodan Yang, Weizhong Wu, Jiang Feng, Luzhao Hum Vaccin Immunother Novel Vaccines The intranasal spray COVID-19 vaccine was made available for the first time in China, it is necessary to understand receivers’ satisfaction and experience toward the vaccine to help optimize vaccination service. A self-administered multicenter cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted in Beijing, China, in December 2022. The vaccination experience was evaluated through three dimensions: immediate tolerance, smooth progress, and time-saving. Vaccine acceptability was measured by receivers’ preference for the intranasal spray over intramuscular injection after vaccination and their recommendation willingness. Stepwise multinomial and binary logistic regression models were applied to investigate factors associated with vaccine acceptability. Among 10,452 participants included in the analysis, 92.6% felt no discomfort during the inoculation, 99.8% thought the vaccination process went well, and 89.4% deemed it a time-saving option. For vaccine acceptability, 5566 (53.3%) participants were willing to recommend the vaccine to others, 534 (5.1%) refused, and 4352 (41.6%) had not decided yet; 6142 (58.8%) participants preferred the intranasal spray, 873 (8.4%) preferred the intramuscular injection, and 3437 (32.9%) had no preferences. The most concerned aspects of the intranasal spray vaccine were vaccine effectiveness and safety. Receivers who perceived higher vaccine effectiveness or safety were more likely to recommend it to others (OR, 95%CI: 4.41, 3.24–6.00; 6.11, 4.52–8.27) or prefer it over intramuscular injection after vaccination (OR, 95%CI: 5.94, 4.62–7.65; 8.50, 6.70–10.78). Receivers showed good acceptability and experience toward the intranasal spray COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccine effectiveness and safety were the most concerned aspects, and corresponding publicity and education efforts may help improve vaccine acceptability. Taylor & Francis 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10351447/ /pubmed/37450312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2023.2235963 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
spellingShingle Novel Vaccines
Ma, Yuan
Li, Juan
Cao, Yanlin
Li, Wei
Shi, Rujing
Jia, Bin
Wang, Haihong
Yan, Le
Suo, Luodan
Yang, Weizhong
Wu, Jiang
Feng, Luzhao
Acceptability for the influenza virus vector COVID-19 vaccine for intranasal spray: A cross-sectional survey in Beijing, China
title Acceptability for the influenza virus vector COVID-19 vaccine for intranasal spray: A cross-sectional survey in Beijing, China
title_full Acceptability for the influenza virus vector COVID-19 vaccine for intranasal spray: A cross-sectional survey in Beijing, China
title_fullStr Acceptability for the influenza virus vector COVID-19 vaccine for intranasal spray: A cross-sectional survey in Beijing, China
title_full_unstemmed Acceptability for the influenza virus vector COVID-19 vaccine for intranasal spray: A cross-sectional survey in Beijing, China
title_short Acceptability for the influenza virus vector COVID-19 vaccine for intranasal spray: A cross-sectional survey in Beijing, China
title_sort acceptability for the influenza virus vector covid-19 vaccine for intranasal spray: a cross-sectional survey in beijing, china
topic Novel Vaccines
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10351447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37450312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2023.2235963
work_keys_str_mv AT mayuan acceptabilityfortheinfluenzavirusvectorcovid19vaccineforintranasalsprayacrosssectionalsurveyinbeijingchina
AT lijuan acceptabilityfortheinfluenzavirusvectorcovid19vaccineforintranasalsprayacrosssectionalsurveyinbeijingchina
AT caoyanlin acceptabilityfortheinfluenzavirusvectorcovid19vaccineforintranasalsprayacrosssectionalsurveyinbeijingchina
AT liwei acceptabilityfortheinfluenzavirusvectorcovid19vaccineforintranasalsprayacrosssectionalsurveyinbeijingchina
AT shirujing acceptabilityfortheinfluenzavirusvectorcovid19vaccineforintranasalsprayacrosssectionalsurveyinbeijingchina
AT jiabin acceptabilityfortheinfluenzavirusvectorcovid19vaccineforintranasalsprayacrosssectionalsurveyinbeijingchina
AT wanghaihong acceptabilityfortheinfluenzavirusvectorcovid19vaccineforintranasalsprayacrosssectionalsurveyinbeijingchina
AT yanle acceptabilityfortheinfluenzavirusvectorcovid19vaccineforintranasalsprayacrosssectionalsurveyinbeijingchina
AT suoluodan acceptabilityfortheinfluenzavirusvectorcovid19vaccineforintranasalsprayacrosssectionalsurveyinbeijingchina
AT yangweizhong acceptabilityfortheinfluenzavirusvectorcovid19vaccineforintranasalsprayacrosssectionalsurveyinbeijingchina
AT wujiang acceptabilityfortheinfluenzavirusvectorcovid19vaccineforintranasalsprayacrosssectionalsurveyinbeijingchina
AT fengluzhao acceptabilityfortheinfluenzavirusvectorcovid19vaccineforintranasalsprayacrosssectionalsurveyinbeijingchina