Cargando…
Skin bacterial community differences among three species of co-occurring Ranid frogs
Skin microbial communities are an essential part of host health and can play a role in mitigating disease. Host and environmental factors can shape and alter these microbial communities and, therefore, we need to understand to what extent these factors influence microbial communities and how this ca...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10351513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37465150 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15556 |
_version_ | 1785074346956423168 |
---|---|
author | Gajewski, Zachary Johnson, Leah R. Medina, Daniel Crainer, William W. Nagy, Christopher M. Belden, Lisa K. |
author_facet | Gajewski, Zachary Johnson, Leah R. Medina, Daniel Crainer, William W. Nagy, Christopher M. Belden, Lisa K. |
author_sort | Gajewski, Zachary |
collection | PubMed |
description | Skin microbial communities are an essential part of host health and can play a role in mitigating disease. Host and environmental factors can shape and alter these microbial communities and, therefore, we need to understand to what extent these factors influence microbial communities and how this can impact disease dynamics. Microbial communities have been studied in amphibian systems due to skin microbial communities providing some resistance to the amphibian chytrid fungus, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. However, we are only starting to understand how host and environmental factors shape these communities for amphibians. In this study, we examined whether amphibian skin bacterial communities differ among host species, host infection status, host developmental stage, and host habitat. We collected skin swabs from tadpoles and adults of three Ranid frog species (Lithobates spp.) at the Mianus River Gorge Preserve in Bedford, New York, USA, and used 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing to determine bacterial community composition. Our analysis suggests amphibian skin bacterial communities change across host developmental stages, as has been documented previously. Additionally, we found that skin bacterial communities differed among Ranid species, with skin communities on the host species captured in streams or bogs differing from the communities of the species captured on land. Thus, habitat use of different species may drive differences in host-associated microbial communities for closely-related host species. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10351513 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103515132023-07-18 Skin bacterial community differences among three species of co-occurring Ranid frogs Gajewski, Zachary Johnson, Leah R. Medina, Daniel Crainer, William W. Nagy, Christopher M. Belden, Lisa K. PeerJ Biodiversity Skin microbial communities are an essential part of host health and can play a role in mitigating disease. Host and environmental factors can shape and alter these microbial communities and, therefore, we need to understand to what extent these factors influence microbial communities and how this can impact disease dynamics. Microbial communities have been studied in amphibian systems due to skin microbial communities providing some resistance to the amphibian chytrid fungus, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. However, we are only starting to understand how host and environmental factors shape these communities for amphibians. In this study, we examined whether amphibian skin bacterial communities differ among host species, host infection status, host developmental stage, and host habitat. We collected skin swabs from tadpoles and adults of three Ranid frog species (Lithobates spp.) at the Mianus River Gorge Preserve in Bedford, New York, USA, and used 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing to determine bacterial community composition. Our analysis suggests amphibian skin bacterial communities change across host developmental stages, as has been documented previously. Additionally, we found that skin bacterial communities differed among Ranid species, with skin communities on the host species captured in streams or bogs differing from the communities of the species captured on land. Thus, habitat use of different species may drive differences in host-associated microbial communities for closely-related host species. PeerJ Inc. 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10351513/ /pubmed/37465150 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15556 Text en © 2023 Gajewski et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Biodiversity Gajewski, Zachary Johnson, Leah R. Medina, Daniel Crainer, William W. Nagy, Christopher M. Belden, Lisa K. Skin bacterial community differences among three species of co-occurring Ranid frogs |
title | Skin bacterial community differences among three species of co-occurring Ranid frogs |
title_full | Skin bacterial community differences among three species of co-occurring Ranid frogs |
title_fullStr | Skin bacterial community differences among three species of co-occurring Ranid frogs |
title_full_unstemmed | Skin bacterial community differences among three species of co-occurring Ranid frogs |
title_short | Skin bacterial community differences among three species of co-occurring Ranid frogs |
title_sort | skin bacterial community differences among three species of co-occurring ranid frogs |
topic | Biodiversity |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10351513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37465150 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15556 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gajewskizachary skinbacterialcommunitydifferencesamongthreespeciesofcooccurringranidfrogs AT johnsonleahr skinbacterialcommunitydifferencesamongthreespeciesofcooccurringranidfrogs AT medinadaniel skinbacterialcommunitydifferencesamongthreespeciesofcooccurringranidfrogs AT crainerwilliamw skinbacterialcommunitydifferencesamongthreespeciesofcooccurringranidfrogs AT nagychristopherm skinbacterialcommunitydifferencesamongthreespeciesofcooccurringranidfrogs AT beldenlisak skinbacterialcommunitydifferencesamongthreespeciesofcooccurringranidfrogs |