Cargando…

Prescription patterns of granulocyte colony–stimulating factors in patients with breast cancer: A real-world study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Myelosuppressive chemotherapy is effective for breast cancer but carries a potential risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). Clinical practice guidelines have recommended prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to reduce the incidence of FN in patients rec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsu, Shu-Wei, Chiang, Shao-Chin, Hsu, Jason C., Ko, Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10351717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37459309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288642
_version_ 1785074390923214848
author Hsu, Shu-Wei
Chiang, Shao-Chin
Hsu, Jason C.
Ko, Yu
author_facet Hsu, Shu-Wei
Chiang, Shao-Chin
Hsu, Jason C.
Ko, Yu
author_sort Hsu, Shu-Wei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Myelosuppressive chemotherapy is effective for breast cancer but carries a potential risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). Clinical practice guidelines have recommended prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to reduce the incidence of FN in patients receiving chemotherapy. We aimed to examine the use of G-CSFs for primary prophylaxis for FN and to see whether it follows the guidelines. In addition, we examined the changes in the use of long-acting and short-acting G-CSFs in patients with breast cancer over the past ten years. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational real-world study. The data were obtained from the clinical research database of three hospitals affiliated with Taipei Medical University. Patients with breast cancer who initiated their first chemotherapy regimen between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020, were identified by the ICD codes and their use of filgrastim or pegfilgrastim was identified by the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes. Whether and how G-CSF was prescribed during the study patients’ first chemotherapy regimen was examined, and the annual change in the total number of short- and long-acting G-CSFs prescribed to the study patients from 2011 to 2020 was analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 2,444 patients who were prescribed at least one of the examined 15 breast cancer chemotherapy drugs, 1,414 did not use any G-CSFs during their first chemotherapy regimen while 145 used G-CSFs for primary prophylaxis and 185 for treatment. Among the patients receiving high FN risk regimens, only 8.6% used G-CSF for primary prophylaxis. The average (± SD) number of days for short-acting G-CSF use was 2.3 (± 1.5) days with a median of 2 days. In addition, it was found that there was a significant reduction in long-acting G-CSF use (p = 0.03) whereas the changes in short-acting G-CSF use over time were not significant (p = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: Our study results show that G-CSFs are used for primary prophylaxis in a small percentage of patients with breast cancer and the duration of short-acting G-CSF use is relatively short. Considering the significant clinical and economic impact of FN, it is hoped that the prescription patterns of G-CSFs observed can provide an important reference for future clinical practice and reimbursement policy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10351717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103517172023-07-18 Prescription patterns of granulocyte colony–stimulating factors in patients with breast cancer: A real-world study Hsu, Shu-Wei Chiang, Shao-Chin Hsu, Jason C. Ko, Yu PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Myelosuppressive chemotherapy is effective for breast cancer but carries a potential risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). Clinical practice guidelines have recommended prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to reduce the incidence of FN in patients receiving chemotherapy. We aimed to examine the use of G-CSFs for primary prophylaxis for FN and to see whether it follows the guidelines. In addition, we examined the changes in the use of long-acting and short-acting G-CSFs in patients with breast cancer over the past ten years. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational real-world study. The data were obtained from the clinical research database of three hospitals affiliated with Taipei Medical University. Patients with breast cancer who initiated their first chemotherapy regimen between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020, were identified by the ICD codes and their use of filgrastim or pegfilgrastim was identified by the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes. Whether and how G-CSF was prescribed during the study patients’ first chemotherapy regimen was examined, and the annual change in the total number of short- and long-acting G-CSFs prescribed to the study patients from 2011 to 2020 was analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 2,444 patients who were prescribed at least one of the examined 15 breast cancer chemotherapy drugs, 1,414 did not use any G-CSFs during their first chemotherapy regimen while 145 used G-CSFs for primary prophylaxis and 185 for treatment. Among the patients receiving high FN risk regimens, only 8.6% used G-CSF for primary prophylaxis. The average (± SD) number of days for short-acting G-CSF use was 2.3 (± 1.5) days with a median of 2 days. In addition, it was found that there was a significant reduction in long-acting G-CSF use (p = 0.03) whereas the changes in short-acting G-CSF use over time were not significant (p = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: Our study results show that G-CSFs are used for primary prophylaxis in a small percentage of patients with breast cancer and the duration of short-acting G-CSF use is relatively short. Considering the significant clinical and economic impact of FN, it is hoped that the prescription patterns of G-CSFs observed can provide an important reference for future clinical practice and reimbursement policy. Public Library of Science 2023-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10351717/ /pubmed/37459309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288642 Text en © 2023 Hsu et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hsu, Shu-Wei
Chiang, Shao-Chin
Hsu, Jason C.
Ko, Yu
Prescription patterns of granulocyte colony–stimulating factors in patients with breast cancer: A real-world study
title Prescription patterns of granulocyte colony–stimulating factors in patients with breast cancer: A real-world study
title_full Prescription patterns of granulocyte colony–stimulating factors in patients with breast cancer: A real-world study
title_fullStr Prescription patterns of granulocyte colony–stimulating factors in patients with breast cancer: A real-world study
title_full_unstemmed Prescription patterns of granulocyte colony–stimulating factors in patients with breast cancer: A real-world study
title_short Prescription patterns of granulocyte colony–stimulating factors in patients with breast cancer: A real-world study
title_sort prescription patterns of granulocyte colony–stimulating factors in patients with breast cancer: a real-world study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10351717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37459309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288642
work_keys_str_mv AT hsushuwei prescriptionpatternsofgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsinpatientswithbreastcancerarealworldstudy
AT chiangshaochin prescriptionpatternsofgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsinpatientswithbreastcancerarealworldstudy
AT hsujasonc prescriptionpatternsofgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsinpatientswithbreastcancerarealworldstudy
AT koyu prescriptionpatternsofgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsinpatientswithbreastcancerarealworldstudy