Cargando…

Comparison of Edge of Lamina Block with Thoracic Paravertebral Block and Retrolaminar Block for Analgesic Efficacy in Adult Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Study

BACKGROUND: A novel ultrasound-guided paravertebral block, the edge laminar block (ELB) was reported recently. However, it was unclear how effective ELB was in comparison with traditional blocking methods. We conducted a trial to compare the analgesic efficacy of ELB with the thoracic paravertebral...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Xiaoyun, Chen, Moxi, Liu, Penghao, Zhou, Shenyuan, Kong, Sai, Zhang, Junfeng, Cao, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10352140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37469958
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S409721
_version_ 1785074454693412864
author Gao, Xiaoyun
Chen, Moxi
Liu, Penghao
Zhou, Shenyuan
Kong, Sai
Zhang, Junfeng
Cao, Jun
author_facet Gao, Xiaoyun
Chen, Moxi
Liu, Penghao
Zhou, Shenyuan
Kong, Sai
Zhang, Junfeng
Cao, Jun
author_sort Gao, Xiaoyun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A novel ultrasound-guided paravertebral block, the edge laminar block (ELB) was reported recently. However, it was unclear how effective ELB was in comparison with traditional blocking methods. We conducted a trial to compare the analgesic efficacy of ELB with the thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) and the retrolaminar block (RLB) in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). METHODS: We identified 90 patients who were scheduled for VATS and randomly assigned them to three groups: ELB group (Group E), TPVB group (Group T), and RLB group (Group R). Each group underwent ELB, TPVB, and RLB, respectively, under ultrasound guidance before general anesthesia induction. All patients received post-operative routine analgesia protocol. Our primary outcome was the extent of dermatomal sensory loss on the midclavicular, midaxillary, and scapular lines, measured using a pinprick 15 minutes after the nerve block. Secondary outcomes included the intraoperative dose of sufentanil, the numerical rating scale (NRS) scores assessed in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 6, 12, and 24 hours post-operatively, and pethidine administrated as analgesic rescue dose. RESULTS: The percentages of nerve block range reaching the midclavicular line, midaxillary line, and scapular line in Group E were 96.7%, 93.3%, 93.3%, and 60% in Group T and 30%, 56.7%, and 96.7% in Group R, respectively. Group E had wider dermatomal sensory loss on the midclavicular line and midaxillary line compared to Group R (P < 0.001) and had a wider range compared to Group T on the scapular line (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the intraoperative use of sufentanil in the three groups. Post-operative NRS scores at each time point were significantly lower in Group E than those in the other two groups (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: ELB had a wider nerve block range and applied better post-operative analgesia in comparison with TPVB and RLB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10352140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103521402023-07-19 Comparison of Edge of Lamina Block with Thoracic Paravertebral Block and Retrolaminar Block for Analgesic Efficacy in Adult Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Study Gao, Xiaoyun Chen, Moxi Liu, Penghao Zhou, Shenyuan Kong, Sai Zhang, Junfeng Cao, Jun J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: A novel ultrasound-guided paravertebral block, the edge laminar block (ELB) was reported recently. However, it was unclear how effective ELB was in comparison with traditional blocking methods. We conducted a trial to compare the analgesic efficacy of ELB with the thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) and the retrolaminar block (RLB) in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). METHODS: We identified 90 patients who were scheduled for VATS and randomly assigned them to three groups: ELB group (Group E), TPVB group (Group T), and RLB group (Group R). Each group underwent ELB, TPVB, and RLB, respectively, under ultrasound guidance before general anesthesia induction. All patients received post-operative routine analgesia protocol. Our primary outcome was the extent of dermatomal sensory loss on the midclavicular, midaxillary, and scapular lines, measured using a pinprick 15 minutes after the nerve block. Secondary outcomes included the intraoperative dose of sufentanil, the numerical rating scale (NRS) scores assessed in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 6, 12, and 24 hours post-operatively, and pethidine administrated as analgesic rescue dose. RESULTS: The percentages of nerve block range reaching the midclavicular line, midaxillary line, and scapular line in Group E were 96.7%, 93.3%, 93.3%, and 60% in Group T and 30%, 56.7%, and 96.7% in Group R, respectively. Group E had wider dermatomal sensory loss on the midclavicular line and midaxillary line compared to Group R (P < 0.001) and had a wider range compared to Group T on the scapular line (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the intraoperative use of sufentanil in the three groups. Post-operative NRS scores at each time point were significantly lower in Group E than those in the other two groups (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: ELB had a wider nerve block range and applied better post-operative analgesia in comparison with TPVB and RLB. Dove 2023-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10352140/ /pubmed/37469958 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S409721 Text en © 2023 Gao et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Gao, Xiaoyun
Chen, Moxi
Liu, Penghao
Zhou, Shenyuan
Kong, Sai
Zhang, Junfeng
Cao, Jun
Comparison of Edge of Lamina Block with Thoracic Paravertebral Block and Retrolaminar Block for Analgesic Efficacy in Adult Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Study
title Comparison of Edge of Lamina Block with Thoracic Paravertebral Block and Retrolaminar Block for Analgesic Efficacy in Adult Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_full Comparison of Edge of Lamina Block with Thoracic Paravertebral Block and Retrolaminar Block for Analgesic Efficacy in Adult Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Edge of Lamina Block with Thoracic Paravertebral Block and Retrolaminar Block for Analgesic Efficacy in Adult Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Edge of Lamina Block with Thoracic Paravertebral Block and Retrolaminar Block for Analgesic Efficacy in Adult Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_short Comparison of Edge of Lamina Block with Thoracic Paravertebral Block and Retrolaminar Block for Analgesic Efficacy in Adult Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_sort comparison of edge of lamina block with thoracic paravertebral block and retrolaminar block for analgesic efficacy in adult patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery: a prospective randomized study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10352140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37469958
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S409721
work_keys_str_mv AT gaoxiaoyun comparisonofedgeoflaminablockwiththoracicparavertebralblockandretrolaminarblockforanalgesicefficacyinadultpatientsundergoingvideoassistedthoracicsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT chenmoxi comparisonofedgeoflaminablockwiththoracicparavertebralblockandretrolaminarblockforanalgesicefficacyinadultpatientsundergoingvideoassistedthoracicsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT liupenghao comparisonofedgeoflaminablockwiththoracicparavertebralblockandretrolaminarblockforanalgesicefficacyinadultpatientsundergoingvideoassistedthoracicsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT zhoushenyuan comparisonofedgeoflaminablockwiththoracicparavertebralblockandretrolaminarblockforanalgesicefficacyinadultpatientsundergoingvideoassistedthoracicsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT kongsai comparisonofedgeoflaminablockwiththoracicparavertebralblockandretrolaminarblockforanalgesicefficacyinadultpatientsundergoingvideoassistedthoracicsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT zhangjunfeng comparisonofedgeoflaminablockwiththoracicparavertebralblockandretrolaminarblockforanalgesicefficacyinadultpatientsundergoingvideoassistedthoracicsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT caojun comparisonofedgeoflaminablockwiththoracicparavertebralblockandretrolaminarblockforanalgesicefficacyinadultpatientsundergoingvideoassistedthoracicsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedstudy