Cargando…

Staphylococci planktonic and biofilm environments differentially affect osteoclast formation

INTRODUCTION: The pathophysiology of chronic implant-related bone infections is characterized by an increase in osteoclast numbers and enhanced bone resorption. Biofilms are a major reason for chronicity of such infections as the biofilm matrix protects bacteria against antibiotics and impairs the f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seebach, Elisabeth, Kraus, Franziska V., Elschner, Tabea, Kubatzky, Katharina F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10352167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37329360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00011-023-01745-9
_version_ 1785074459849261056
author Seebach, Elisabeth
Kraus, Franziska V.
Elschner, Tabea
Kubatzky, Katharina F.
author_facet Seebach, Elisabeth
Kraus, Franziska V.
Elschner, Tabea
Kubatzky, Katharina F.
author_sort Seebach, Elisabeth
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The pathophysiology of chronic implant-related bone infections is characterized by an increase in osteoclast numbers and enhanced bone resorption. Biofilms are a major reason for chronicity of such infections as the biofilm matrix protects bacteria against antibiotics and impairs the function of immune cells. Macrophages are osteoclast precursor cells and therefore linked to inflammation and bone destruction. OBJECTIVE AND METHOD: Investigations on the impact of biofilms on the ability of macrophages to form osteoclasts are yet missing and we, therefore, analyzed the effect of Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (SE) planktonic and biofilm environments on osteoclastogenesis using RAW 264.7 cells and conditioned media (CM). RESULTS: Priming with the osteoclastogenic cytokine RANKL before CM addition enabled the cells to differentiate into osteoclasts. This effect was highest in SE planktonic or SA biofilm CM. Simultaneous stimulation with CM and RANKL, however, suppressed osteoclast formation and resulted in formation of inflammation-associated multinucleated giant cells (MGCs) which was most pronounced in SE planktonic CM. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that the biofilm environment and its high lactate levels are not actively promoting osteoclastogenesis. Hence, the inflammatory immune response against planktonic bacterial factors through Toll-like receptors seems to be the central cause for the pathological osteoclast formation. Therefore, immune stimulation or approaches that aim at biofilm disruption need to consider that this might result in enhanced inflammation-mediated bone destruction. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00011-023-01745-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10352167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103521672023-07-19 Staphylococci planktonic and biofilm environments differentially affect osteoclast formation Seebach, Elisabeth Kraus, Franziska V. Elschner, Tabea Kubatzky, Katharina F. Inflamm Res Original Research Paper INTRODUCTION: The pathophysiology of chronic implant-related bone infections is characterized by an increase in osteoclast numbers and enhanced bone resorption. Biofilms are a major reason for chronicity of such infections as the biofilm matrix protects bacteria against antibiotics and impairs the function of immune cells. Macrophages are osteoclast precursor cells and therefore linked to inflammation and bone destruction. OBJECTIVE AND METHOD: Investigations on the impact of biofilms on the ability of macrophages to form osteoclasts are yet missing and we, therefore, analyzed the effect of Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (SE) planktonic and biofilm environments on osteoclastogenesis using RAW 264.7 cells and conditioned media (CM). RESULTS: Priming with the osteoclastogenic cytokine RANKL before CM addition enabled the cells to differentiate into osteoclasts. This effect was highest in SE planktonic or SA biofilm CM. Simultaneous stimulation with CM and RANKL, however, suppressed osteoclast formation and resulted in formation of inflammation-associated multinucleated giant cells (MGCs) which was most pronounced in SE planktonic CM. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that the biofilm environment and its high lactate levels are not actively promoting osteoclastogenesis. Hence, the inflammatory immune response against planktonic bacterial factors through Toll-like receptors seems to be the central cause for the pathological osteoclast formation. Therefore, immune stimulation or approaches that aim at biofilm disruption need to consider that this might result in enhanced inflammation-mediated bone destruction. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00011-023-01745-9. Springer International Publishing 2023-06-17 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10352167/ /pubmed/37329360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00011-023-01745-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Paper
Seebach, Elisabeth
Kraus, Franziska V.
Elschner, Tabea
Kubatzky, Katharina F.
Staphylococci planktonic and biofilm environments differentially affect osteoclast formation
title Staphylococci planktonic and biofilm environments differentially affect osteoclast formation
title_full Staphylococci planktonic and biofilm environments differentially affect osteoclast formation
title_fullStr Staphylococci planktonic and biofilm environments differentially affect osteoclast formation
title_full_unstemmed Staphylococci planktonic and biofilm environments differentially affect osteoclast formation
title_short Staphylococci planktonic and biofilm environments differentially affect osteoclast formation
title_sort staphylococci planktonic and biofilm environments differentially affect osteoclast formation
topic Original Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10352167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37329360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00011-023-01745-9
work_keys_str_mv AT seebachelisabeth staphylococciplanktonicandbiofilmenvironmentsdifferentiallyaffectosteoclastformation
AT krausfranziskav staphylococciplanktonicandbiofilmenvironmentsdifferentiallyaffectosteoclastformation
AT elschnertabea staphylococciplanktonicandbiofilmenvironmentsdifferentiallyaffectosteoclastformation
AT kubatzkykatharinaf staphylococciplanktonicandbiofilmenvironmentsdifferentiallyaffectosteoclastformation