Cargando…
Blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasm: contemporary review and 2024 treatment algorithm
Leukemic transformation in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), also referred to as “blast-phase MPN”, is the most feared disease complication, with incidence estimates of 1–4% for essential thrombocythemia, 3–7% for polycythemia vera, and 9–13% for primary myelofibrosis. Diagnosis of MPN-BP requires...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10352315/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37460550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41408-023-00878-8 |
_version_ | 1785074486647717888 |
---|---|
author | Tefferi, Ayalew Alkhateeb, Hassan Gangat, Naseema |
author_facet | Tefferi, Ayalew Alkhateeb, Hassan Gangat, Naseema |
author_sort | Tefferi, Ayalew |
collection | PubMed |
description | Leukemic transformation in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), also referred to as “blast-phase MPN”, is the most feared disease complication, with incidence estimates of 1–4% for essential thrombocythemia, 3–7% for polycythemia vera, and 9–13% for primary myelofibrosis. Diagnosis of MPN-BP requires the presence of ≥20% circulating or bone marrow blasts; a lower level of excess blasts (10–19%) constitutes “accelerated phase” disease (MPN-AP). Neither “intensive” nor “less intensive” chemotherapy, by itself, secures long-term survival in MPN-BP. Large-scale retrospective series have consistently shown a dismal prognosis in MPN-BP, with 1- and 3-year survival estimates of <20% and <5%, respectively. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) offers the possibility of a >30% 3-year survival rate and should be pursued, ideally, while the patient is still in chronic phase disease. The value of pre-transplant bridging chemotherapy is uncertain in MPN-AP while it is advised in MPN-BP; in this regard, we currently favor combination chemotherapy with venetoclax (Ven) and hypomethylating agent (HMA); response is more likely in the absence of complex/monosomal karyotype and presence of TET2 mutation. Furthermore, in the presence of an IDH mutation, the use of IDH inhibitors, either alone or in combination with Ven-HMA, can be considered. Pre-transplant clearance of excess blasts is desired but not mandated; in this regard, additional salvage chemotherapy is more likely to compromise transplant eligibility rather than improve post-transplant survival. Controlled studies are needed to determine the optimal pre- and post-transplant measures that target transplant-associated morbidity and post-transplant relapse. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10352315 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103523152023-07-19 Blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasm: contemporary review and 2024 treatment algorithm Tefferi, Ayalew Alkhateeb, Hassan Gangat, Naseema Blood Cancer J Current Treatment Algorithm Leukemic transformation in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), also referred to as “blast-phase MPN”, is the most feared disease complication, with incidence estimates of 1–4% for essential thrombocythemia, 3–7% for polycythemia vera, and 9–13% for primary myelofibrosis. Diagnosis of MPN-BP requires the presence of ≥20% circulating or bone marrow blasts; a lower level of excess blasts (10–19%) constitutes “accelerated phase” disease (MPN-AP). Neither “intensive” nor “less intensive” chemotherapy, by itself, secures long-term survival in MPN-BP. Large-scale retrospective series have consistently shown a dismal prognosis in MPN-BP, with 1- and 3-year survival estimates of <20% and <5%, respectively. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) offers the possibility of a >30% 3-year survival rate and should be pursued, ideally, while the patient is still in chronic phase disease. The value of pre-transplant bridging chemotherapy is uncertain in MPN-AP while it is advised in MPN-BP; in this regard, we currently favor combination chemotherapy with venetoclax (Ven) and hypomethylating agent (HMA); response is more likely in the absence of complex/monosomal karyotype and presence of TET2 mutation. Furthermore, in the presence of an IDH mutation, the use of IDH inhibitors, either alone or in combination with Ven-HMA, can be considered. Pre-transplant clearance of excess blasts is desired but not mandated; in this regard, additional salvage chemotherapy is more likely to compromise transplant eligibility rather than improve post-transplant survival. Controlled studies are needed to determine the optimal pre- and post-transplant measures that target transplant-associated morbidity and post-transplant relapse. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10352315/ /pubmed/37460550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41408-023-00878-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Current Treatment Algorithm Tefferi, Ayalew Alkhateeb, Hassan Gangat, Naseema Blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasm: contemporary review and 2024 treatment algorithm |
title | Blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasm: contemporary review and 2024 treatment algorithm |
title_full | Blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasm: contemporary review and 2024 treatment algorithm |
title_fullStr | Blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasm: contemporary review and 2024 treatment algorithm |
title_full_unstemmed | Blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasm: contemporary review and 2024 treatment algorithm |
title_short | Blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasm: contemporary review and 2024 treatment algorithm |
title_sort | blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasm: contemporary review and 2024 treatment algorithm |
topic | Current Treatment Algorithm |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10352315/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37460550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41408-023-00878-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tefferiayalew blastphasemyeloproliferativeneoplasmcontemporaryreviewand2024treatmentalgorithm AT alkhateebhassan blastphasemyeloproliferativeneoplasmcontemporaryreviewand2024treatmentalgorithm AT gangatnaseema blastphasemyeloproliferativeneoplasmcontemporaryreviewand2024treatmentalgorithm |