Cargando…

The Feasibility and Safety of Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Definitive Chemoradiation in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Single-Arm Phase II Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed at investigating the feasibility and safety of induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiation (dCRT) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-arm clinical trial, patients with cervical cancer (stages IB...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmadloo, Niloofar, Heidarpourfard, Marzieh, Najib, Fatemeh Sadat, Shiravani, Zahra, Omidvari, Shapour, Mosalaei, Ahmad, Mohammadianpanah, Mohammad, Ansari, Mansour, Nasrolahi, Hamid, Khanjani, Nezhat, Kadkhodaei, Behnam, Hamedi, Seyed Hassan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10352727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37116155
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.4.1321
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The present study aimed at investigating the feasibility and safety of induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiation (dCRT) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-arm clinical trial, patients with cervical cancer (stages IB3-IVA) received a median four cycles of induction chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin, every three weeks) followed by dCRT (which consisted of the whole pelvis at the dose of 45-50 Gy along with weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m(2)) followed by intracavitary brachytherapy at the total dose of 80-90 Gy). Primary end point was local control at three months, which was assessed by gynecologic examination and pelvic MRI. The secondary outcome of the study was treatment-related toxicity. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients with the mean age of 51.6 ± 9.5 years were included. The most frequent (51.4%) disease stage was IIB. Complete and partial clinical responses were observed in 60.8% and 14.9% of patients, respectively. The frequency of progressive disease and stable disease were 14.9% and 9.5%, respectively. Grade II and III neutropenia (during neoadjuvant chemotherapy were 13.5% and 2.7%, respectively; these figures during chemoradiation were 29.7% and 13.5%, respectively. A treatment interruption was observed for 60.8% (45 cases) of patients during chemoradiation and 31.1% during induction chemotherapy. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation is feasible in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer; however, the toxicity should be managed properly to avoid delayed e treatment. More than three quarters of the patients achieved complete or partial clinical response within a three-month follow-up.