Cargando…

Optimal Combination of Pitch, Modulation Factor and Dosimetric Considerations in Treatment Planning for Total Body Irradiation Using Helical Tomotherapy

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to makethe standard total body irradiation (TBI) protocol for Helical tomotherapy© (HT) and to analyze the optimal pitch and modulation factor (MF) with respect to dose homogeneity index (HI), target dose coverage, target overdose, beam on time (BOT) and mean lung...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaliyaperumal, Venkatesan, Kataria, Tejinder, Tamilselvan, Singaravelu, Gupta, Deepak, Abraham, Susan K, Narang, Kushal, Banerjee, Susovan, Dayanithi, Kamaraj, Rajesh, Selvaraj, Bisht, Shyam S, Shishak, Sorun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10352750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37116146
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.4.1239
_version_ 1785074576673210368
author Kaliyaperumal, Venkatesan
Kataria, Tejinder
Tamilselvan, Singaravelu
Gupta, Deepak
Abraham, Susan K
Narang, Kushal
Banerjee, Susovan
Dayanithi, Kamaraj
Rajesh, Selvaraj
Bisht, Shyam S
Shishak, Sorun
author_facet Kaliyaperumal, Venkatesan
Kataria, Tejinder
Tamilselvan, Singaravelu
Gupta, Deepak
Abraham, Susan K
Narang, Kushal
Banerjee, Susovan
Dayanithi, Kamaraj
Rajesh, Selvaraj
Bisht, Shyam S
Shishak, Sorun
author_sort Kaliyaperumal, Venkatesan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to makethe standard total body irradiation (TBI) protocol for Helical tomotherapy© (HT) and to analyze the optimal pitch and modulation factor (MF) with respect to dose homogeneity index (HI), target dose coverage, target overdose, beam on time (BOT) and mean lung dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients who underwent high-dose TBI were taken for this study. For each patient, 35 dose plans were created by different combination of pitch and MF. The optimal pitch and MF were deduced using scatter plot and regression methodology based on target coverage, HI, target volume receiving 103%(V(103%)), 105%(V(105%)) and 107% (V(107%)) of the prescription dose and BOT. Using these optimal pitch and MF, the final dose plan was made and the planning aim and achieved dose was compared using two tailed student’s t-test. Radiochromic films and ionization chambers were used to measure the delivered dose using anthropomorphic phantom on various points for the head and pelvis regions to verify the skin flash margin and its effect on skin dose. RESULTS: The optimal pitch and MF value were 0.287 and 2.4 respectively. Based on optimal pitch and MF, the mean BOT was 1692 seconds with optimal inhomogeneity (7.4%). For target, D95 and D98 were 97.09% (range:94.7-99.6%, p=0.002) and 93.9% (range:91.5-94.4%,p=0.007) respectively, and mean D2 was within 107% with SD of ±1.22% (p=0.04). The mean of PTV receiving V(103), V105 and V107 was 24.48% (range=7.7-36.6%, p=0.03), 5.76% (range=1.4-12.1%, SD=±3.3%), 1.93% (range=0.1-4.6%, p=0.008) respectively. Our measurements show that the flash margin did not increase the skin dose. CONCLUSION: In our study, the optimal combination of pitch value of 0.287 and MF value of 2.4 provided acceptable plans for all patients planned for TBI in HT. The flash margin can provide adequate coverage during patient position uncertainty without increasing the skin dose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10352750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103527502023-07-19 Optimal Combination of Pitch, Modulation Factor and Dosimetric Considerations in Treatment Planning for Total Body Irradiation Using Helical Tomotherapy Kaliyaperumal, Venkatesan Kataria, Tejinder Tamilselvan, Singaravelu Gupta, Deepak Abraham, Susan K Narang, Kushal Banerjee, Susovan Dayanithi, Kamaraj Rajesh, Selvaraj Bisht, Shyam S Shishak, Sorun Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Research Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to makethe standard total body irradiation (TBI) protocol for Helical tomotherapy© (HT) and to analyze the optimal pitch and modulation factor (MF) with respect to dose homogeneity index (HI), target dose coverage, target overdose, beam on time (BOT) and mean lung dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients who underwent high-dose TBI were taken for this study. For each patient, 35 dose plans were created by different combination of pitch and MF. The optimal pitch and MF were deduced using scatter plot and regression methodology based on target coverage, HI, target volume receiving 103%(V(103%)), 105%(V(105%)) and 107% (V(107%)) of the prescription dose and BOT. Using these optimal pitch and MF, the final dose plan was made and the planning aim and achieved dose was compared using two tailed student’s t-test. Radiochromic films and ionization chambers were used to measure the delivered dose using anthropomorphic phantom on various points for the head and pelvis regions to verify the skin flash margin and its effect on skin dose. RESULTS: The optimal pitch and MF value were 0.287 and 2.4 respectively. Based on optimal pitch and MF, the mean BOT was 1692 seconds with optimal inhomogeneity (7.4%). For target, D95 and D98 were 97.09% (range:94.7-99.6%, p=0.002) and 93.9% (range:91.5-94.4%,p=0.007) respectively, and mean D2 was within 107% with SD of ±1.22% (p=0.04). The mean of PTV receiving V(103), V105 and V107 was 24.48% (range=7.7-36.6%, p=0.03), 5.76% (range=1.4-12.1%, SD=±3.3%), 1.93% (range=0.1-4.6%, p=0.008) respectively. Our measurements show that the flash margin did not increase the skin dose. CONCLUSION: In our study, the optimal combination of pitch value of 0.287 and MF value of 2.4 provided acceptable plans for all patients planned for TBI in HT. The flash margin can provide adequate coverage during patient position uncertainty without increasing the skin dose. West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10352750/ /pubmed/37116146 http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.4.1239 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research Article
Kaliyaperumal, Venkatesan
Kataria, Tejinder
Tamilselvan, Singaravelu
Gupta, Deepak
Abraham, Susan K
Narang, Kushal
Banerjee, Susovan
Dayanithi, Kamaraj
Rajesh, Selvaraj
Bisht, Shyam S
Shishak, Sorun
Optimal Combination of Pitch, Modulation Factor and Dosimetric Considerations in Treatment Planning for Total Body Irradiation Using Helical Tomotherapy
title Optimal Combination of Pitch, Modulation Factor and Dosimetric Considerations in Treatment Planning for Total Body Irradiation Using Helical Tomotherapy
title_full Optimal Combination of Pitch, Modulation Factor and Dosimetric Considerations in Treatment Planning for Total Body Irradiation Using Helical Tomotherapy
title_fullStr Optimal Combination of Pitch, Modulation Factor and Dosimetric Considerations in Treatment Planning for Total Body Irradiation Using Helical Tomotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Optimal Combination of Pitch, Modulation Factor and Dosimetric Considerations in Treatment Planning for Total Body Irradiation Using Helical Tomotherapy
title_short Optimal Combination of Pitch, Modulation Factor and Dosimetric Considerations in Treatment Planning for Total Body Irradiation Using Helical Tomotherapy
title_sort optimal combination of pitch, modulation factor and dosimetric considerations in treatment planning for total body irradiation using helical tomotherapy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10352750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37116146
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.4.1239
work_keys_str_mv AT kaliyaperumalvenkatesan optimalcombinationofpitchmodulationfactoranddosimetricconsiderationsintreatmentplanningfortotalbodyirradiationusinghelicaltomotherapy
AT katariatejinder optimalcombinationofpitchmodulationfactoranddosimetricconsiderationsintreatmentplanningfortotalbodyirradiationusinghelicaltomotherapy
AT tamilselvansingaravelu optimalcombinationofpitchmodulationfactoranddosimetricconsiderationsintreatmentplanningfortotalbodyirradiationusinghelicaltomotherapy
AT guptadeepak optimalcombinationofpitchmodulationfactoranddosimetricconsiderationsintreatmentplanningfortotalbodyirradiationusinghelicaltomotherapy
AT abrahamsusank optimalcombinationofpitchmodulationfactoranddosimetricconsiderationsintreatmentplanningfortotalbodyirradiationusinghelicaltomotherapy
AT narangkushal optimalcombinationofpitchmodulationfactoranddosimetricconsiderationsintreatmentplanningfortotalbodyirradiationusinghelicaltomotherapy
AT banerjeesusovan optimalcombinationofpitchmodulationfactoranddosimetricconsiderationsintreatmentplanningfortotalbodyirradiationusinghelicaltomotherapy
AT dayanithikamaraj optimalcombinationofpitchmodulationfactoranddosimetricconsiderationsintreatmentplanningfortotalbodyirradiationusinghelicaltomotherapy
AT rajeshselvaraj optimalcombinationofpitchmodulationfactoranddosimetricconsiderationsintreatmentplanningfortotalbodyirradiationusinghelicaltomotherapy
AT bishtshyams optimalcombinationofpitchmodulationfactoranddosimetricconsiderationsintreatmentplanningfortotalbodyirradiationusinghelicaltomotherapy
AT shishaksorun optimalcombinationofpitchmodulationfactoranddosimetricconsiderationsintreatmentplanningfortotalbodyirradiationusinghelicaltomotherapy