Cargando…
Wedge resection versus segment IVb and V resection of the liver for T2 gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVES: Although guidelines recommend extended cholecystectomy for T2 gallbladder cancer (GBC), the optimal hepatectomy strategy remains controversial. The study aims to compare the prognosis of T2 GBC patients who underwent wedge resection (WR) versus segment IVb and V resection (SR) of the liv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10352769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37469411 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1186378 |
_version_ | 1785074581349859328 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Zhehan Yu, Jiayu Cao, Jiasheng Lin, Chenping Hu, Jiahao Zhang, Bin Shen, Jiliang Feng, Xu Topatana, Win Chen, Mingyu Fang, Haixing |
author_facet | Chen, Zhehan Yu, Jiayu Cao, Jiasheng Lin, Chenping Hu, Jiahao Zhang, Bin Shen, Jiliang Feng, Xu Topatana, Win Chen, Mingyu Fang, Haixing |
author_sort | Chen, Zhehan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Although guidelines recommend extended cholecystectomy for T2 gallbladder cancer (GBC), the optimal hepatectomy strategy remains controversial. The study aims to compare the prognosis of T2 GBC patients who underwent wedge resection (WR) versus segment IVb and V resection (SR) of the liver. METHODS: A specific search of online databases was performed from May 2001 to February 2023. The postoperative efficacy outcomes were synthesized and meta-analyses were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 9 studies involving 2,086 (SR = 627, WR = 1,459) patients were included in the study. The primary outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). For DFS, the 1-year DFS was statistically higher in patients undergoing SR than WR [risk ratio (RR) = 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.02-1.13, P = 0.007]. The 3-year DFS (P = 0.95), 5-year DFS (P = 0.77), and hazard ratio (HR) of DFS (P = 0.72) were similar between the two groups. However, the 3-year OS was significantly lower in patients who underwent SR than WR [RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.82-0.99, P = 0.03]. Moreover, SR had a higher hazard HR of OS [HR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.01-1.75, P = 0.04]. No significant difference was found in 1-year (P = 0.32) and 5-year (P = 0.9) OS. For secondary outcomes, patients who received SR tended to develop postoperative complications (POC) [RR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.00-3.60, P = 0.05]. In addition, no significant differences in intrahepatic recurrence (P = 0.12) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, SR can improve the prognosis of T2 GBC patients in DFS. In contrast to WR, the high HR and complications associated with SR cannot be neglected. Therefore, surgeons should evaluate the condition of the patients and take their surgical skills into account when selecting SR. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier, CRD42022362974. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10352769 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103527692023-07-19 Wedge resection versus segment IVb and V resection of the liver for T2 gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Chen, Zhehan Yu, Jiayu Cao, Jiasheng Lin, Chenping Hu, Jiahao Zhang, Bin Shen, Jiliang Feng, Xu Topatana, Win Chen, Mingyu Fang, Haixing Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVES: Although guidelines recommend extended cholecystectomy for T2 gallbladder cancer (GBC), the optimal hepatectomy strategy remains controversial. The study aims to compare the prognosis of T2 GBC patients who underwent wedge resection (WR) versus segment IVb and V resection (SR) of the liver. METHODS: A specific search of online databases was performed from May 2001 to February 2023. The postoperative efficacy outcomes were synthesized and meta-analyses were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 9 studies involving 2,086 (SR = 627, WR = 1,459) patients were included in the study. The primary outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). For DFS, the 1-year DFS was statistically higher in patients undergoing SR than WR [risk ratio (RR) = 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.02-1.13, P = 0.007]. The 3-year DFS (P = 0.95), 5-year DFS (P = 0.77), and hazard ratio (HR) of DFS (P = 0.72) were similar between the two groups. However, the 3-year OS was significantly lower in patients who underwent SR than WR [RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.82-0.99, P = 0.03]. Moreover, SR had a higher hazard HR of OS [HR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.01-1.75, P = 0.04]. No significant difference was found in 1-year (P = 0.32) and 5-year (P = 0.9) OS. For secondary outcomes, patients who received SR tended to develop postoperative complications (POC) [RR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.00-3.60, P = 0.05]. In addition, no significant differences in intrahepatic recurrence (P = 0.12) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, SR can improve the prognosis of T2 GBC patients in DFS. In contrast to WR, the high HR and complications associated with SR cannot be neglected. Therefore, surgeons should evaluate the condition of the patients and take their surgical skills into account when selecting SR. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier, CRD42022362974. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10352769/ /pubmed/37469411 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1186378 Text en Copyright © 2023 Chen, Yu, Cao, Lin, Hu, Zhang, Shen, Feng, Topatana, Chen and Fang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Chen, Zhehan Yu, Jiayu Cao, Jiasheng Lin, Chenping Hu, Jiahao Zhang, Bin Shen, Jiliang Feng, Xu Topatana, Win Chen, Mingyu Fang, Haixing Wedge resection versus segment IVb and V resection of the liver for T2 gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Wedge resection versus segment IVb and V resection of the liver for T2 gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Wedge resection versus segment IVb and V resection of the liver for T2 gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Wedge resection versus segment IVb and V resection of the liver for T2 gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Wedge resection versus segment IVb and V resection of the liver for T2 gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Wedge resection versus segment IVb and V resection of the liver for T2 gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | wedge resection versus segment ivb and v resection of the liver for t2 gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10352769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37469411 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1186378 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenzhehan wedgeresectionversussegmentivbandvresectionoftheliverfort2gallbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yujiayu wedgeresectionversussegmentivbandvresectionoftheliverfort2gallbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT caojiasheng wedgeresectionversussegmentivbandvresectionoftheliverfort2gallbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT linchenping wedgeresectionversussegmentivbandvresectionoftheliverfort2gallbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hujiahao wedgeresectionversussegmentivbandvresectionoftheliverfort2gallbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangbin wedgeresectionversussegmentivbandvresectionoftheliverfort2gallbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shenjiliang wedgeresectionversussegmentivbandvresectionoftheliverfort2gallbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fengxu wedgeresectionversussegmentivbandvresectionoftheliverfort2gallbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT topatanawin wedgeresectionversussegmentivbandvresectionoftheliverfort2gallbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenmingyu wedgeresectionversussegmentivbandvresectionoftheliverfort2gallbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fanghaixing wedgeresectionversussegmentivbandvresectionoftheliverfort2gallbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |